Literature DB >> 25908772

Are patients with cardiac implants protected against electromagnetic interference in daily life and occupational environment?

Andreas Napp1, Dominik Stunder2, Melanie Maytin3, Thomas Kraus2, Nikolaus Marx4, Sarah Driessen2.   

Abstract

Utilization of cardiac implants such as pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators is now commonplace among heart disease patients. The ever-increasing technological complexity of these devices is matched by the near omnipresent exposure to electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (EMFs), both in everyday life and the occupational environment. Given that electromagnetic interferences (EMIs) are associated with potential risk in device patients, physicians are increasingly confronted with managing device patients with intermittent EMI and chronic occupational exposure. The current review aims to provide a contemporary overview of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices, their function and susceptibility of non-medical EMFs and provide recommendations for physicians caring for cardiac device patients presenting with EMI. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2015. For permissions please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cardiac pacemaker; Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices; Electromagnetic fields; Electromagnetic interference; Implantable cardioverter defibrillators

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25908772     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  10 in total

Review 1.  [Electromagnetic interference : Pacemakers, cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator].

Authors:  Bernd Nowak; Oliver Przibille; Andreas Napp
Journal:  Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol       Date:  2022-07-04

2.  Determining EMC Test Levels for Implantable Devices in Bipolar Lead Configuration.

Authors:  Seth J Seidman; Howard I Bassen
Journal:  Biomed Instrum Technol       Date:  2021-07-01

3.  Electromagnetic Interference in a Private Swimming Pool: Case report.

Authors:  Sandia Iskandar; Madhav Lavu; Moustapha Atoui; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J       Date:  2016-02-12

Review 4.  Biological effects of exposure to static electric fields in humans and vertebrates: a systematic review.

Authors:  Anne-Kathrin Petri; Kristina Schmiedchen; Dominik Stunder; Dagmar Dechent; Thomas Kraus; William H Bailey; Sarah Driessen
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2017-04-17       Impact factor: 5.984

5.  Occupational Exposure to Electromagnetic Fields and Health Surveillance According to the European Directive 2013/35/EU.

Authors:  Alberto Modenese; Fabriziomaria Gobba
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-02-10       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Safety of mechanical lung vibrator and high-frequency chest wall oscillation in patients with cardiac implantable electronic device.

Authors:  Hye Bin Gwag; Hyun Sung Joh; June Soo Kim; Kyoung-Min Park; Young Keun On; Seung-Jung Park
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2021-02-16       Impact factor: 2.882

7.  In Vivo Study of Electromagnetic Interference With Cardiac Contractility Modulation Devices at Power Frequency.

Authors:  Matthias Daniel Zink; Dominik Stunder; Tobias Theiler; Thomas Kraus; Nikolaus Marx; Andreas Napp
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-08-18       Impact factor: 5.501

8.  Inappropriate shock delivery as a result of electromagnetic interference originating from the faulty electrical installation.

Authors:  Milos D Babic; Milosav Tomovic; Maja Milosevic; Branko Djurdjevic; Vasko Zugic; Aleksandra Nikolic
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2022-04-25       Impact factor: 1.485

9.  Influence and safety of electronic apex locators in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: a systematic review.

Authors:  Mothanna K AlRahabi; Hani M Ghabbani
Journal:  Libyan J Med       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.657

10.  Electromagnetic interference in cardiac electronic implants caused by novel electrical appliances emitting electromagnetic fields in the intermediate frequency range: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sarah Driessen; Andreas Napp; Kristina Schmiedchen; Thomas Kraus; Dominik Stunder
Journal:  Europace       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 5.214

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.