Literature DB >> 25908431

Spectrum of enteropathogens detected by the FilmArray GI Panel in a multicentre study of community-acquired gastroenteritis.

A Spina1, K G Kerr2, M Cormican3, F Barbut4, A Eigentler5, L Zerva6, P Tassios6, G A Popescu7, A Rafila7, E Eerola8, J Batista9, M Maass10, R Aschbacher11, K E P Olsen12, F Allerberger13.   

Abstract

The European, multicentre, quarterly point-prevalence study of community-acquired diarrhoea (EUCODI) analysed stool samples received at ten participating clinical microbiology laboratories (Austria, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal, Romania, and the UK) in 2014. On four specified days, each local laboratory submitted samples from ≤20 consecutive patients to the Austrian Study Centre for further testing with the FilmArray GI Panel (BioFire Diagnostics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA). Of the 709 samples from as many patients received, 325 (45.8%) tested negative, 268 (37.8%) yielded only one organism, and 116 (16.4%) yielded multiple organisms. Positivity rates ranged from 41% (30 of 73 samples) in France to 74% (59 of 80 samples) in Romania. With the exception of Entamoeba histolytica and Vibrio cholerae, all of the 22 targeted pathogens were detected at least once. Enteropathogenic Escherichia coli, Campylobacter species, toxigenic Clostridium difficile, enteroaggregative E. coli, norovirus and enterotoxigenic E. coli were the six most commonly detected pathogens. When tested according to local protocols, seven of 128 positive samples (5.5%) yielded multiple organisms. Overall, the FilmArray GI Panel detected at least one organism in 54.2% (384/709) of the samples, as compared with 18.1% (128/709) when testing was performed with conventional techniques locally. This underlines the considerable potential of multiplex PCR to improve routine stool diagnostics in community-acquired diarrhoea. Classic culture methods directed at the isolation of specific pathogens are increasingly becoming second-line tools, being deployed when rapid molecular tests give positive results. This optimizes the yield from stool examinations and dramatically improves the timeliness of diagnosis.
Copyright © 2015 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Community-acquired; gastroenteritis; gastrointestinal pathogens; multiplex PCR detection; stool

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25908431     DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2015.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Microbiol Infect        ISSN: 1198-743X            Impact factor:   8.067


  53 in total

Review 1.  Multiplex Molecular Panels for Diagnosis of Gastrointestinal Infection: Performance, Result Interpretation, and Cost-Effectiveness.

Authors:  Matthew J Binnicker
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Enteropathogen detection in children with diarrhoea, or vomiting, or both, comparing rectal flocked swabs with stool specimens: an outpatient cohort study.

Authors:  Stephen B Freedman; Jianling Xie; Alberto Nettel-Aguirre; Bonita Lee; Linda Chui; Xiao-Li Pang; Ran Zhuo; Brendon Parsons; James A Dickinson; Otto G Vanderkooi; Samina Ali; Lara Osterreicher; Karen Lowerison; Phillip I Tarr
Journal:  Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2017-07-14

3.  Use and Interpretation of Enteropathogen Multiplex Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests in Patients With Suspected Infectious Diarrhea.

Authors:  Harika Yalamanchili; Dima Dandachi; Pablo C Okhuysen
Journal:  Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y)       Date:  2018-11

4.  Comparative Evaluation of Enteric Bacterial Culture and a Molecular Multiplex Syndromic Panel in Children with Acute Gastroenteritis.

Authors:  Thomas Kellner; Brendon Parsons; Linda Chui; Byron M Berenger; Jianling Xie; C A Burnham; Phillip I Tarr; Bonita E Lee; Alberto Nettel-Aguirre; Jonas Szelewicki; Otto G Vanderkooi; Xiao-Li Pang; Nathan Zelyas; Stephen B Freedman
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Rapid Molecular Detection of Gastrointestinal Pathogens and Its Role in Antimicrobial Stewardship.

Authors:  Şiran Keske; Burak Zabun; Kahraman Aksoy; Füsun Can; Erhan Palaoğlu; Önder Ergönül
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2018-04-25       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Syndromic Panel-Based Testing in Clinical Microbiology.

Authors:  Poornima Ramanan; Alexandra L Bryson; Matthew J Binnicker; Bobbi S Pritt; Robin Patel
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Multisite Evaluation of the BD Max Extended Enteric Bacterial Panel for Detection of Yersinia enterocolitica, Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli, Vibrio, and Plesiomonas shigelloides from Stool Specimens.

Authors:  Patricia J Simner; Margret Oethinger; Kathleen A Stellrecht; Dylan R Pillai; Ram Yogev; Helene Leblond; Joel Mortensen
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Multicenter evaluation of the new QIAstat Gastrointestinal Panel for the rapid syndromic testing of acute gastroenteritis.

Authors:  Irene Hannet; Anne Line Engsbro; Josep Pareja; Uffe Vest Schneider; Jan Gorm Lisby; Blanka Pružinec-Popović; Achim Hoerauf; Marijo Parčina
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2019-07-27       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 9.  Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Wiep Klaas Smits; Dena Lyras; D Borden Lacy; Mark H Wilcox; Ed J Kuijper
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 52.329

10.  Diagnostic tools for tackling febrile illness and enhancing patient management.

Authors:  Konstantinos Mitsakakis; Valérie D'Acremont; Sebastian Hin; Felix von Stetten; Roland Zengerle
Journal:  Microelectron Eng       Date:  2018-10-05       Impact factor: 2.523

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.