| Literature DB >> 25907914 |
Stefan T Engelter1, Christopher Traenka2, Alexander Von Hessling3, Philippe A Lyrer2.
Abstract
Cervical artery dissection (CAD) is a major cause of stroke in the young. A mural hematoma is detected in most CAD patients. The intramural blood accumulation should not be considered a reason to withhold intravenous thrombolysis in patients with CAD-related stroke. Because intravenous-thrombolyzed CAD patients might not recover as well as other stroke patients, acute endovascular treatment is an alternative. Regarding the choice of antithrombotic agents, this article discusses the findings of 4 meta-analyses across observational data, the current status of 3 randomized controlled trials, and arguments and counterarguments favoring anticoagulants over antiplatelets. Furthermore, the role of stenting and surgery is addressed.Entities:
Keywords: Anticoagulants; Antipatelets; Cervical artery dissection; Endovascular treatment; IV thrombolysis; Stroke; Surgery
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25907914 DOI: 10.1016/j.ncl.2014.12.002
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Neurol Clin ISSN: 0733-8619 Impact factor: 3.806