Literature DB >> 25907780

The impact of viral dynamics on the clinical severity of infants with respiratory syncytial virus bronchiolitis.

Lili Zhou1,2,3, Qiuyan Xiao1,2, Yao Zhao1,2, Ailong Huang4, Luo Ren1,2, Enmei Liu5.   

Abstract

The impact of dynamic respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) load on the clinical severity of hospitalized infants with bronchiolitis has not been clarified. Nasopharyngeal aspirates were obtained from 60 infants who were diagnosed with bronchiolitis within 96 hr of wheezing onset upon admission and on days 3, 5, and 7 in the hospital, and 17 respiratory viruses were detected. The RSV load was quantified by real-time qPCR for RSV subtypes A and B at different time points. Scoring criteria were used to evaluate the degree of severity. A total of 40 infants were determined to be RSV-positive, nine were identified as RSV subtype A (RSVA), and 31 were RSV subtype B (RSVB). The peak RSV load was observed upon admission, and the RSV load decreased significantly over time; in addition, this decrease began to have significant differences on day 5. There was a positive correlation between the RSV load and the clinical score (r(2)  = 0.121 and P < 0.001). According to the clinical scores, the infants in the severe group tended to have higher RSV loads than those in the moderate and mild groups. Multivariate logistic regression models revealed that the viral load on day 3 was independently associated with the degree of severity. This study elucidated that a higher mean RSV load was associated with a more severe disease and a longer duration of hospitalization and symptoms. This study also clarified RSV replication in infants and provides a theoretical basis for specifying an anti-RSV therapy strategy.
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  RSV load; bronchiolitis; clinical severity; infants; time points

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25907780      PMCID: PMC7166664          DOI: 10.1002/jmv.24111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Virol        ISSN: 0146-6615            Impact factor:   2.327


respiratory syncytial virus respiratory syncytial virus subgroup A respiratory syncytial virus subgroup B influenza virus A influenza virus B influenza virus C human coronaviruses CoV‐229E human coronaviruses CoV‐OC43 human metapneumovirus parainfluenza virus 1‐4 human rhinovirus subtypes A human rhinovirus subtypes B human rhinovirus subtypes C human Bocavirus adenovirus

INTRODUCTION

Bronchiolitis is a common acute respiratory tract infection, which is a distressing, potentially life‐threatening respiratory condition that affects young babies [Rosalind, 2006]. It is generally characterized by acute inflammation, edema, and necrosis of epithelial cells lining small airways, leading to rhinorrhea, cough, wheezing, hyperexpansion of the lungs, hypoxia, and respiratory distress [Panitch, 2003; Pavia, 2011]. RSV is the most common etiological agent of bronchiolitis. It was estimated that 66,000–199,000 children younger than 5 years died from RSV‐associated acute respiratory tract infection in 2005, with 99% of these deaths occurring in developing countries [Nair et al., 2010]. In the UK, the RSV‐attributed death rate in infants has been estimated to be 8.4 per 100,000 [Fleming et al., 2005]. The incidence and mortality can vary substantially from year to year. At present, there is no special medicine for the treatment of bronchiolitis. It has been reported that approximately 1% of infants with bronchiolitis need to go to the hospital for treatment and that 10% of them require treatment in an intensive care unit (ICU) [Nagakumar and Doull, 2012]. It has been reported that the RSV loads after symptom onset are correlated with disease severity in hospitalized infants [Buckingham et al., 2000; Scagnolari et al., 2012]. Higher RSV loads predict disease severity in infants who were previously healthy correlating with longer durations of hospitalization [DeVincenzo et al., 2005; El Saleeby et al., 2011]. Recent studies also report that disease severity is positively correlated with the viral load during primary RSV infection [Houben et al., 2010]. Some reports have investigated the relationship between RSV viral dynamics and disease severity. In their study, the viral loads on day 3 were associated more significantly with a requirement for intensive care and respiratory failure than the viral loads at earlier time points. Faster RSV clearance was independently associated with shorter hospitalization [El Saleeby et al., 2011]. Clinical improvement was associated with a reduction of viral quantity after three days of hospitalization [Jansen et al., 2010]. However, the relationship between changes in the RSV load dynamics and the disease severity of RSVinfected infants has not been studied in detail. Understanding the relationship between the clinical severity of bronchiolitis and the dynamic RSV load will aid the risk factor assessment of clinical severity and help the development of timely intervention therapy. It will thus provide a conceptual background for understanding the disease pathogenesis of RSV and other respiratory virus infections. This study selected the study subjects with strict inclusion criteria, collected nasopharyngeal aspirates specimens from patients at different time points and used clinical scores to evaluate the bronchiolitis severity objectively to confirm correlations between the severity and changes in the RSV load dynamics during the course of bronchiolitis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Patients

Inclusion criteria: previously healthy children aged ≤24 months diagnosed with bronchiolitis within 96 hr of wheezing onset and hospitalized at the Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University were enrolled in this prospective study during two successive winter seasons (2012–2014). The diagnosis of bronchiolitis is according to the Zhu Futang textbook of Pediatrics [Zhang, 2002]. Bronchiolitis was diagnosed from the presence of a history of upper respiratory tract infection followed by acute onset of respiratory distress with cough, tachypnea, retraction, wheezing, and diffuse crackles on auscultation. Patients were excluded if they had received antiviral (ribavirin) and immunomodulatory agents (prednisone or hydrocortisone) in the preceding two weeks. Children with wheezing, breathlessness, and obstruction of the airways, in whom similar episodes had previously been diagnosed and treated by a physician, were diagnosed as recurrent wheezing and were excluded. Qualified pediatricians identified bronchiolitis and its clinical severity and collected clinical information confidentially. The demographic data and clinical history were collected from guardians via interviews. This study was approved by the Ethics and Research Council of Chongqing Children's Hospital, and signed consent was obtained from each child's parents or foster parents.

Disease Severity Scoring Criteria

Scoring criteria was used to evaluate the severity of bronchiolitis [Wang et al., 1992; Luo et al., 2010]. Based on the total score, the disease severity was divided into the following ranks: mild, 0–4.9; moderate, 5–8.9; and severe, 9–12 (details in Table I).
Table I

Clinical Scores Used to Estimate the Degree of Clinical Disease Severity

0 point1 point2 point3 point
Respiratory rate (breaths/min)≤3031–4546–60>60
Wheezingnoneterminal expiratory or heard only with a stethoscopeentire expiration or audible on expiration without a stethoscopeinspiration and expiration without a stethoscope
Retractionsnoneintercostal onlytracheosternalsevere with nasal flaring irritable, lethargic, poor feeding
General conditionnormal__

The disease severity was evaluated using the clinical score index described by Wang et al. [Wang et al., 1992].

Clinical Scores Used to Estimate the Degree of Clinical Disease Severity The disease severity was evaluated using the clinical score index described by Wang et al. [Wang et al., 1992].

Specimens and Virus Detection

Nasopharyngeal aspirates were collected by a standardized technique from patients upon admission and on days 3, 5, and 7 in the hospital. For samples, the nasopharyngeal aspirates were collected by well‐trained nurses during the same time of day. A disposable controllable suction tube with the negative pressure method was used to collect the nasopharyngeal aspirates through the following operation: a syringe was connected to the plastic disposable sputum suction tube; the sputum tube was placed carefully and gently into the nasopharynx of patients; the saline injection was gently pushed; the disposable controllable suction tube, which is connected to the negative pressure device, can then be used to suck as much as possible of the nasopharynx secretion; and each specimen was diluted with 2 ml of physiological saline. The specimens were maintained at 4°C for a maximum of 4 hr and then stored at −80°C until further processing. The viral DNA and RNA were extracted from 200 µl aliquots of the nasopharyngeal aspirates samples using the QIAamp MinElute Virus Spin kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). RNA was applied as the template for cDNA synthesis using the SuperScript III First‐Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA). The DNA and RNA extractions and cDNA products were used for the subsequent testing of 17 respiratory viruses. The 17 respiratory viruses were detected as follows [Coiras et al., 2003; Coiras et al., 2004; Lu et al., 2006; Granados et al., 2012]: nested PCR assays were used to detect human RSVA, RSVB, IVA, IVB, IVC, CoV‐229E, CoV‐OC43, hMPV, PIV 1–4, and AdV. Real‐time qPCR was used to detect hRV and hBoV.

Real‐Time qPCR for RSV Subtypes A and B

For the RSV‐positive samples tested by nested PCR assays, the RSV load was determined by real‐time qPCR. The primers and probe for RSVA and RSVB N gene amplification are listed in Table II [Hu et al., 2003; Van‐Woensel et al., 2003]. The sequence of the N gene for the RSV A2 strain (GenBank accession number M11486) and that for the RSV B strain (GenBank accession number D00736) were used for the design of the primers and probes. The plasmid‐amplified target fragment was cloned into the pMD19‐T vector (TaKaRa Biotechnology, Dalian, China) and verified by sequencing. The plasmid DNA concentrations were detected with an ND‐1000 spectrophotometer (Nanodrop). Real‐time qPCR was carried out in a total reaction volume of 20 µl consisting of 10 µl of TaqMan Universal Master Mix (Applied Biosystems), 0.6 µl (10 mM) of each primer, 0.6 µl (10 mM) of the probe, 2 µl of template and 6.2 µl of double‐distilled water. The real‐time qPCR thermal cycling reaction and quantitative measurement were performed in a 96‐well format in a StepOne Real‐Time PCR instrument (Applied Biosystems) using the following conditions: one cycle at 50°C for 2 min, one cycle at 95°C for 10 min, 40 cycles at 95°C for 15 sec, and one cycle at 60°C for 1 min. Strict laboratory procedures were followed to prevent PCR contamination, including separate spaces for sample handling, the Master Mix ingredients, and the plasmid templates. All of the runs included negative controls and plasmid in each PCR assay. Representative results from the real‐time qPCR quantification were found for the serial dilutions of RSVA and RSVB plasmids (101–107 copies/reaction) with the baseline‐corrected fluorescence plotted against the cycle number. The standard curves were positioned within each plate, and each run was performed in duplicate. For standard curves of five independent runs, the mean correlation coefficient of RSVA was 0.996 with a standard deviation of 0.004, and the mean value of the slope was −3.53 with a standard deviation of 0.04. The mean correlation coefficient of RSVB was 0.998 with a standard deviation of 0.02, and the mean value of the slope was −3.56 with a standard deviation of 0.17. The standard curves are shown in Figure 1. The RSV load values are expressed as log10 copy number of RSV‐RNA/ml in nasopharyngeal aspirates.
Table II

Primers and Probes for RSVA and RSVB N Gene Amplification

Primer and ProbeSequence (5'‐3')
RSVA‐FAGATCAACTTCTGTCATCCAGCAA
RSVA‐RTTCTGCACATCATAATTAGGAGTATCAAT
RSVA‐PCACCATCCAACGGAGCACAGGAGAT
RSVB‐FGATGGCTCTTAGCAAAGTCAAGTTAA
RSVB‐RTGTCAATATTATCTCCTGTACTACGTTGAA
RSVB‐PTGATACATTAAATAAGGATCAGCTGCTGTCATCCA
Figure 1

Representative results from the real‐time qPCR quantification of serial dilutions of RSVA and RSVB plasmids (101–107copies/reaction). The baseline‐corrected fluorescence was plotted against the cycle number. A: Standard curve and amplification plot of RSVA. B: Standard curve and amplification plot of RSVB.

Primers and Probes for RSVA and RSVB N Gene Amplification Representative results from the real‐time qPCR quantification of serial dilutions of RSVA and RSVB plasmids (101–107copies/reaction). The baseline‐corrected fluorescence was plotted against the cycle number. A: Standard curve and amplification plot of RSVA. B: Standard curve and amplification plot of RSVB.

Statistical Analyses

The data were analyzed using the SPSS 17.0 software package. GraphPad Prism5 (GraphPad Software Inc.) was used to generate figures and graphs. The categorical variables were compared using the Chi‐square test, and continuous variables were compared using Student's t‐test. A two‐sided P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. A correlation analysis of the RSV load and clinical severity data was conducted. Logistic regression was used to determine whether the viral load is independently associated with the degree of severity.

RESULTS

Demographic Clinical and Virological Characteristics

A total of 60 infants met the inclusion criteria. RSV was detected in 40 of these infants (31 were RSVB and 9 were RSVA), six of the infants were found to have other respiratory viruses, and no viruses was detected in 14 children. Single RSV infection was detected in 32 (80%) infants, whereas co‐detections with other respiratory viruses were detected in eight (20%) infants. The demographic, clinical, and virological characteristics of infants with RSV are shown in Table III. The median age of the infants was four (range, 1–11) months. Among the infants, 28 were boys, and 12 were girls. Eighteen (45%) infants had severe bronchiolitis (clinical score ≥9), 18 (45%) had moderate bronchiolitis (clinical score between 5 and 8.9), and four (10%) infants had mild bronchiolitis (clinical score <5).
Table III

Demographic, Clinical and Virological Characteristics of 40 Infants Hospitalized With RSV‐Associated Bronchiolitis

ItemValue
Birth weight (kg)3.15 (1.6–4.6)
Male gender28 (70%)
Age (months)4 (1–11)
Breastfeeding a 16 (40%)
Premature birth b (<37 weeks)6 (15%)
Hemoglobin (g/l)112 (67–149)
White blood cell (109/L)9.89 (4.44–16.73)
Neutrophil granulocyte %38.5 (11–74)
Lymphocyte %55.5 (21–83)
Platelets (109/L)395.5 (109–772)
Length of hospital stay (days)7.5 (5–15)
Clinical severity c
Severe (clinical score ≥9)18 (45%)
Moderate (5 ≤clinical score <9)18 (45%)
Mild (clinical score <5)4 (10%)
Infants with RSVA detection9 (22.5%)
Infants with RSVB detection31 (77.5%)
Infants with RSV single infection32 (80%)
Infants with RSV co‐infection8 (20%)
RSVB and hRVA3 (7.5%)
RSVB and hRVC2 (5%)
RSVA and IVA1 (2.5%)
RSVB and PIV11 (2.5%)
RSVB and PIV31 (2.5%)

The data are expressed as the medians (range) or frequencies (percentage) unless otherwise specified.

Infants received only breastfeeding since birth.

The gestational age of the six non‐term babies were the following: 28 weeks (two babies), 31 weeks (one baby), 32 weeks (one baby), 33 weeks (one baby) and 36 weeks (one baby).

The disease severity of the patients was evaluated upon admission using the clinical score index.

Demographic, Clinical and Virological Characteristics of 40 Infants Hospitalized With RSV‐Associated Bronchiolitis The data are expressed as the medians (range) or frequencies (percentage) unless otherwise specified. Infants received only breastfeeding since birth. The gestational age of the six non‐term babies were the following: 28 weeks (two babies), 31 weeks (one baby), 32 weeks (one baby), 33 weeks (one baby) and 36 weeks (one baby). The disease severity of the patients was evaluated upon admission using the clinical score index.

Relationship Between Clinical Score and Dynamic RSV Load

The RSV load among the 40 infants comprised between 103 and 9.7 × 106 transcripts of RSV per µl of the nasopharyngeal aspirates. The peak RSV load was observed on day 1. The RSV load decreased significantly with increasing time. The mean RSV load on day 1 (4.4 log10 copies/ml) was significantly different from that on day 5 (3.4 log10 copies/ml) and day 7 (3.02 log10 copies/ml), as shown in Figure 2A. The viral loads of RSVA and RSVB in sequential nasopharyngeal aspirates collected at different time points during the disease course are presented in Figures 2B and C, respectively. The clinical score increased with increasing RSV load, indicating a positive correlation (r2 = 0.121 and P < 0.001), as shown in Figure 3A. The mean RSV loads and the mean clinical scores on day 1 were the highest. Over time, the mean viral load decreased, the symptoms improved, and the clinical score decreased (Figure 3B).
Figure 2

A: RSV load in sequential nasopharyngeal aspirates collected at different time points during the disease course. Fourteen nasopharyngeal aspirates specimens could not be collected from 14 patients on day 7 because these patients recovered and were discharged. One specimen was polluted by being dropped to the ground and was deleted. B: RSVA load at different time points. C: RSVB load at different time points. The comparisons at each time point were performed by one‐way ANOVA and Newman‐Keuls analysis. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

Figure 3

A: Relationship between the clinical score and RSV load, as determined by correlation analysis. These points are all of the points from all of the patients at all of the collection time points with the exception of the 15 specimens mentioned in Figure 2. B: Timing of mean RSV load and clinical score. The mean data from all of the infected infants from each collection time point are shown. C: Timing of mean RSV load and clinical score broken down between RSVA and RSVB.

A: RSV load in sequential nasopharyngeal aspirates collected at different time points during the disease course. Fourteen nasopharyngeal aspirates specimens could not be collected from 14 patients on day 7 because these patients recovered and were discharged. One specimen was polluted by being dropped to the ground and was deleted. B: RSVA load at different time points. C: RSVB load at different time points. The comparisons at each time point were performed by one‐way ANOVA and Newman‐Keuls analysis. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. A: Relationship between the clinical score and RSV load, as determined by correlation analysis. These points are all of the points from all of the patients at all of the collection time points with the exception of the 15 specimens mentioned in Figure 2. B: Timing of mean RSV load and clinical score. The mean data from all of the infected infants from each collection time point are shown. C: Timing of mean RSV load and clinical score broken down between RSVA and RSVB. The comparison of demographic factors, clinical characteristics, and RSV load at each time point between the groups with different clinical severity (mild, moderate, and severe group) are listed in Table IV. The age of infants in the severe group was much lower that that of moderate and mild groups with P = 0.005 and P = 0.05 respectively. The infants in the severe group tended to have longer durations of hospitalization and symptoms than those in the moderate group with P = 0.013 and P = 0.016, respectively. The infants in the severe group tended to have higher RSV loads than the moderate and mild groups. On the admission day, the mean RSV load in the severe group was higher than that of the mild group (P = 0.034). On day 3 in the hospital, there were significant differences in the mean RSV load between the mild group and the moderate group with P = 0.001 and between the mild group and the severe group with P = 0.014. Significant differences were observed in the clinical scores among the mild, moderate, and severe groups on days 1, 3, and 5.
Table IV

Comparison of the Demographic Factors, Clinical Characteristics and RSV Load at Each Time Point by Clinical Severity

ItemMild a (n = 4)Moderate b (n = 18)Severe c (n = 18) P
Birth weight (kg)3.1 ± 0.452.99 ± 0.653.2 ± 0.7NS
Male gender4 (100%)13 (72.2%)11 (61.1%)NS
Age (months)4.75 ± 1.235.2 ± 2.72.89 ± 1.91p (ac) = 0.05 p (bc)=0.005
Breastfeeding1 (25%)9 (50.0%)6 (33.3%)NS
Premature birth0 (0%)2 (11.1%)4 (22.2%)NS
Hemoglobin (g/l)105 ± 15.9113.4 ± 16.1109 ± 16.9NS
White blood cell (109/L)13.31 ± 3.49.9 ± 3.3710.0 ± 3.84NS
Neutrophil granulocyte %30.75 ± 14.440.0 ± 14.840.5 ± 19.6NS
Lymphocytes %65.25 ± 14.556.4 ± 16.253.7 ± 19.6NS
Platelets (109/L)551.25 ± 75.6406.9 ± 146427.6 ± 178.7NS
Length of hospital stay (days)7.75 ± 1.237.1 ± 1.148.83 ± 2.5p (bc) = 0.013
Duration of symptoms (days)11.5 ± 1.310.2 ± 1.211.89 ± 2.5p (bc) = 0.016
Day 1 RSV load (log10copies/ml, n = 40)3.62 ± 1.234.1 ± 1.34.87 ± 1.1p (ac) = 0.034
Day 3 RSV load (log10copies/ml, n = 40)2.13 ± 0.494.16 ± 1.34.08 ± 1.2p (ab) = 0.01 p (ac) = 0.014
Day 5 RSV load (log10copies/ml, n = 39)3.02 ± 0.693.49 ± 1.483.4 ± 1.1NS
Day 7 RSV load (log10copies/ml, n = 26)2.02 ± 0.793.13 ± 1.433.2 ± 1.1NS
Day 1 clinical score4.5 ± 1.05.5 ± 1.59.56 ± 1.9p (ac) = 0.002 p (bc)<0.001
Day 3 clinical score3.75 ± 0.963.94 ± 1.47.1 ± 2.4p (ac)=0.007 p (bc) < 0.001
Day 5 clinical score3.0 ± 1.162.5 ± 1.45.0 ± 2.4p (bc) < 0.001
Day 7 clinical score1.33 ± 0.581.9 ± 0.942.6 ± 1.4NS
Δlog10copies/mld1‐d3 3.57 ± 1.314.72 ± 1.205.22 ± 1.75p (ac) = 0.005
Δlog10copies/mld1‐d5 4.54 ± 2.824.66 ± 1.035.09 ± 1.02NS
Δlog10copies/mld1‐d7 3.59 ± 1.254.48 ± 1.015.1 ± 1.6p (ac) = 0.01

The categorical variables were compared using the Chi‐square test, and the continuous variables were compared using Student's t‐test or nonparametric Mann‐Whitney U‐test. P‐values <0.05 were considered to be significant. Fisher's exact test was used when the frequency was less than 5.

mild group.

moderate group.

severe group.

Comparison of the Demographic Factors, Clinical Characteristics and RSV Load at Each Time Point by Clinical Severity The categorical variables were compared using the Chi‐square test, and the continuous variables were compared using Student's t‐test or nonparametric Mann‐Whitney U‐test. P‐values <0.05 were considered to be significant. Fisher's exact test was used when the frequency was less than 5. mild group. moderate group. severe group. Univariate analyses were initially applied to potential risk factors for RSV disease severity (Table IV). Younger age and higher RSV loads on days 1 and 3 were significantly associated with worse disease. The rate of RSV clearance as a predictor of disease severity was also analyzed by multiple logistic regression comparing Δlog10 copy/mld1‐d3, Δlog10 copy/mld1‐d5, and Δlog10 copy/mld1‐d7 from the nasopharyngeal aspirates of the subjects. The variables included in the multiple logistic regression model were those associated with the outcome measures at P < 0.05 that independently predicted disease severity. According to multivariate analysis, the RSV load on day 3 (odds ratio, 8.993; 95% confidence interval, 1.015–79.687; P = 0.048) was a significant risk factors of the disease severity. Age (odds ratio, 0.463; 95% confidence interval, 0.189–1.135; P = 0.092) and the RSV load on day 1 (odds ratio, 1.611; 95% confidence interval, 0.620–4.186; P = 0.328) were not significant risk factors of the disease severity.

Comparison of RSV Subtypes

There were nine infants who were found to have RSVA and 31 infants who were found to be positive for RSVB. Both the RSVA and RSVB loads decreased significantly with increasing time point and the peak viral load were observed on day 1. The mean viral loads of RSVA were not significantly different from that of RSVB on days 1, 3, 5, and 7, as shown in Figure 4A. There were no significant differences in the demographic factors, clinical characteristics and clinical severity between infants with RSVA and those with RSVB. The rate of RSVB clearance was faster than that of RSVA clearance (data not shown).
Figure 4

A: RSV subtype A and B viral loads in nasopharyngeal aspirates collected at different time points during the disease course. B: Viral load of RSV (A plus B) detected alone and RSV (A plus B) co‐detected with other viruses in nasopharyngeal aspirates collected at different time points during the disease course.

A: RSV subtype A and B viral loads in nasopharyngeal aspirates collected at different time points during the disease course. B: Viral load of RSV (A plus B) detected alone and RSV (A plus B) co‐detected with other viruses in nasopharyngeal aspirates collected at different time points during the disease course.

Comparison of RSV Co‐Detection of Other Viruses and RSV Single Detection

There were eight infants for whom RSV was co‐detected with other viruses and 32 infants with only RSV. The mean viral loads of RSV co‐detected with other viruses were not significantly different from those of RSV only on days 1, 3, 5, and 7, as shown in Figure 4B. There were no significant differences in the demographic factors, clinical characteristics and clinical severity between these two groups. The rate of RSV clearance in the infants with RSV co‐detected with other viruses was not different from the clearance rate of RSV in the infants with only RSV (data not shown).

DISCUSSION

The peak RSV load was observed on day 1 of admission and decreased significantly with increasing time point. There was a positive correlation between the RSV load and the clinical score. Multivariate logistic regression models revealed that the viral load on day 3 was independent of the degree of severity. This study elucidated that a higher mean RSV load is associated with a more severe disease and longer durations of hospitalization and symptoms. The risk factors of severe bronchiolitis are likely to be determined by the host and viral factors. Other research has reported that age contributed to disease severity to a larger extent [Brand et al., 2012]. However, the age was not the independent risk factor of the degree of severity in this study. The age of patients with severe disease was significantly lower than that with moderate and mild disease in Table IV. The median age of the infants in severe group was 2 months whereas that was 4.5 months in moderate group and 5 months in mild group. It is known to us that babies lost maternal antibody protection at 4–6 months, and their own immune system is not mature enough to protect them against virus. Some reports have determined age‐specific incidence estimates for hospitalization with severe RSV disease and compared neutralizing antibody response patterns. Disease incidence peaked at between 2 and 3.9 months of life. Following RSV natural infection, relative to the mean acute phase antibody titre, the mean convalescent titre was lower in the 0–1.9 month age class, no different in the 2–3.9 month age class and greater in all age classes greater than 4 months [Sande et al., 2014]. To address early RSV load differences, this study included infants diagnosed with bronchiolitis within 96 hr of wheezing onset. This study observed four time points dynamically at the acute phase of the disease and found that the peak RSV load was on day 1 in the infants upon admission. Some reports indicate that the RSV load peaks approximately 3.5 days after symptom onset and subsequently declines [DeVincenzo et al., 2010]. It is reported that the A2 RSV strain had the highest peak viral load on day 4 p.i. RSV 2–20 infection in BALB/c mice [Stokes et al., 2011]. In this study, a positive correlation was observed between the RSV load and the clinical score. The infants in the severe group tended to have a higher mean RSV load than the moderate and mild groups. These observations were consistent with other report [El Saleeby et al., 2011]. It has been described the relationship between the viral dynamics and the RSV disease severity on each study day (days 1, 2, and 3). Faster RSV clearance was independently associated with shorter hospitalization. However, this study observed that the RSV load on day 3 was independently associated with the degree of severity, and this finding was not determined for the rest of the study time points. Their study did not test the association between viral load and disease severity after day 3. This different result may be associated with the date of disease onset. In this study, previously healthy children aged ≤24 months were enrolled if they had been diagnosed with bronchiolitis within 96 hr of wheezing onset. In their study, patients were enrolled if RSV was detected from their respiratory secretions within the past 48 hr. The mean RSV loads and the mean clinical scores on day 1 were the highest. As time went on, the mean viral load decreased, the symptoms improved, and the clinical score decreased. This observation is consistent with those reported by previous studies [Buckingham et al., 2000; DeVincenzo et al., 2005; Perkins et al., 2005; DeVincenzo et al., 2010]. The viral loads may vary by RSV subtypes and affect the clinical severity. The predominant RSV subtype shifts from year to year [Zhang et al., 2010; Ren et al., 2014], and the immunity against the previous circulating subtype could have altered the disease severity caused by specific subtypes. Infection with RSVA has been shown in several studies to produce more severe disease than RSVB [Papadopoulos et al., 2004; Tran et al., 2013]. In this study, there were nine infants with RSVA, and no significant differences were observed in the viral load and clinical severity between the infants with RSVA and those with RSVB. Few studies have demonstrated no significant differences in clinical severity between RSV subtypes [Devincenzo, 2004; Fodha et al., 2007; Jafri et al., 2013]. However, some studies have indicated that RSVA results in more severe disease than RSVB [Mansbach et al., 2012; Tran et al., 2013]. In this study, the co‐detection of RSV with other viruses did not add disease severity compared with the single detection of RSV. This observation is consistent with previous studies [Brand et al., 2012]. However, some studies have reported that RSV co‐detected with some viruses, such as human metapneumovirus, human rhinovirus, and human Bocavirus, can induce much more severe disease [Papadopoulos et al., 2002; Semple et al., 2005; Midulla et al., 2009]. The rate of RSV clearance in infants with RSV co‐detected with other viruses was not different from that found in infants with only RSV. This finding adds to our knowledge in this field. In addition, this study has certain limitations: it was limited by a small sample size and by the analysis of only two RSV epidemic seasons. Studies with larger samples and covering a larger time period are needed to support our findings. The dynamic RSV load was associated with the clinical severity of bronchiolitis in hospitalized infants. A higher mean RSV load lead to a higher mean clinical score and more disease severe with longer durations of hospitalization and symptoms. These findings may give rise to infants' being infected with a high RSV load and particularly severe disease.
  36 in total

1.  Mortality in children from influenza and respiratory syncytial virus.

Authors:  Douglas M Fleming; Rachel S Pannell; Kenneth W Cross
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  Quantitation of respiratory viruses in relation to clinical course in children with acute respiratory tract infections.

Authors:  Rogier R Jansen; Janke Schinkel; Irene Dek; Sylvie M Koekkoek; Caroline E Visser; Menno D de Jong; Richard Molenkamp; Dasja Pajkrt
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.129

3.  Genetic variability of respiratory syncytial viruses (RSV) prevalent in Southwestern China from 2006 to 2009: emergence of subgroup B and A RSV as dominant strains.

Authors:  Zhi-Yong Zhang; Li-Na Du; Xin Chen; Yao Zhao; En-Mei Liu; Xi-Qiang Yang; Xiao-Dong Zhao
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2010-02-10       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Nasal quantity of respiratory syncytical virus correlates with disease severity in hospitalized infants.

Authors:  S C Buckingham; A J Bush; J P Devincenzo
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 2.129

Review 5.  Global burden of acute lower respiratory infections due to respiratory syncytial virus in young children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Harish Nair; D James Nokes; Bradford D Gessner; Mukesh Dherani; Shabir A Madhi; Rosalyn J Singleton; Katherine L O'Brien; Anna Roca; Peter F Wright; Nigel Bruce; Aruna Chandran; Evropi Theodoratou; Agustinus Sutanto; Endang R Sedyaningsih; Mwanajuma Ngama; Patrick K Munywoki; Cissy Kartasasmita; Eric A F Simões; Igor Rudan; Martin W Weber; Harry Campbell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-05-01       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Distribution of respiratory syncytial virus subtypes A and B among infants presenting to the emergency department with lower respiratory tract infection or apnea.

Authors:  Hasan S Jafri; Xionghua Wu; Doris Makari; Kelly J Henrickson
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 2.129

7.  Natural infection of infants with respiratory syncytial virus subgroups A and B: a study of frequency, disease severity, and viral load.

Authors:  John P Devincenzo
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2004-10-06       Impact factor: 3.756

8.  Simultaneous detection, subgrouping, and quantitation of respiratory syncytial virus A and B by real-time PCR.

Authors:  Aizhong Hu; Melissa Colella; John S Tam; Ruth Rappaport; Sheau-Mei Cheng
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Evaluation of viral load in infants hospitalized with bronchiolitis caused by respiratory syncytial virus.

Authors:  Carolina Scagnolari; Fabio Midulla; Carla Selvaggi; Katia Monteleone; Enea Bonci; Paola Papoff; Giulia Cangiano; Paola Di Marco; Corrado Moretti; Alessandra Pierangeli; Guido Antonelli
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  The association between age and the development of respiratory syncytial virus neutralising antibody responses following natural infection in infants.

Authors:  Charles J Sande; Patricia A Cane; D J Nokes
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2014-07-06       Impact factor: 3.641

View more
  11 in total

1.  Elevated Levels of Type 2 Respiratory Innate Lymphoid Cells in Human Infants with Severe Respiratory Syncytial Virus Bronchiolitis.

Authors:  Luan D Vu; David Siefker; Tamekia L Jones; Dahui You; Ryleigh Taylor; John DeVincenzo; Stephania A Cormier
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 21.405

2.  Antibody response to respiratory syncytial virus infection in children <18 months old.

Authors:  Susanna Esposito; Elisa Scarselli; Mara Lelii; Alessia Scala; Alessandra Vitelli; Stefania Capone; Marco Fornili; Elia Biganzoli; Annalisa Orenti; Alfredo Nicosia; Riccardo Cortese; Nicola Principi
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2016-02-22       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Respiratory syncytial virus: viral load, viral decay, and disease progression in children with bronchiolitis.

Authors:  Raí André Silva Watanabe; Jessica Santiago Cruz; Luciano Kleber de Souza Luna; Vitória Rodrigues Guimarães Alves; Danielle Dias Conte; Larissa Lyra; Filipe Nishiyama; Bruno Sanchez Camargo; Nancy Bellei
Journal:  Braz J Microbiol       Date:  2022-04-01       Impact factor: 2.214

4.  Lack of association between viral load and severity of acute bronchiolitis in infants.

Authors:  Ana Paula Duarte de Souza; Lidiane Alves de Azeredo Leitão; Fernanda Luisi; Rodrigo Godinho Souza; Sandra Eugênia Coutinho; Jaqueline Ramos da Silva; Rita Mattiello; Paulo Márcio Condessa Pitrez; Renato Tetelbom Stein; Leonardo Araújo Pinto
Journal:  J Bras Pneumol       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.624

5.  Aptamers for respiratory syncytial virus detection.

Authors:  Krisztina Percze; Zoltán Szakács; Éva Scholz; Judit András; Zsuzsanna Szeitner; Corné H van den Kieboom; Gerben Ferwerda; Marien I de Jonge; Róbert E Gyurcsányi; Tamás Mészáros
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A Virological and Phylogenetic Analysis of the Emergence of New Clades of Respiratory Syncytial Virus.

Authors:  Farah Elawar; Cameron D Griffiths; Daniel Zhu; Leanne M Bilawchuk; Lionel D Jensen; Lydia Forss; Julian Tang; Bart Hazes; Steven J Drews; David J Marchant
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Genomic Loads and Genotypes of Respiratory Syncytial Virus: Viral Factors during Lower Respiratory Tract Infection in Chilean Hospitalized Infants.

Authors:  Yazmín Espinosa; Camila San Martín; Alejandro A Torres; Mauricio J Farfán; Juan P Torres; Vasanthi Avadhanula; Pedro A Piedra; Lorena I Tapia
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 5.923

8.  Viral Load Dynamics and Clinical Disease Severity in Infants With Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection.

Authors:  Cristina Garcia-Mauriño; Melissa Moore-Clingenpeel; Jessica Thomas; Sara Mertz; Daniel M Cohen; Octavio Ramilo; Asuncion Mejias
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  2019-04-08       Impact factor: 5.226

9.  RSV Vaccine Based on Rhabdoviral Vector Protects after Single Immunization.

Authors:  Sarah Wilmschen; Sabrina Schneider; Felix Peters; Lea Bayer; Leila Issmail; Zoltán Bánki; Thomas Grunwald; Dorothee von Laer; Janine Kimpel
Journal:  Vaccines (Basel)       Date:  2019-07-03

10.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the prevalence of common respiratory viruses in children < 2 years with bronchiolitis in the pre-COVID-19 pandemic era.

Authors:  Sebastien Kenmoe; Cyprien Kengne-Nde; Jean Thierry Ebogo-Belobo; Donatien Serge Mbaga; Abdou Fatawou Modiyinji; Richard Njouom
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.