Literature DB >> 25907759

Clarifying the role of theory of mind areas during visual perspective taking: Issues of spontaneity and domain-specificity.

Matthias Schurz1, Martin Kronbichler2, Sebastian Weissengruber3, Andrew Surtees4, Dana Samson5, Josef Perner6.   

Abstract

Visual perspective taking is a fundamental feature of the human social brain. Previous research has mainly focused on explicit visual perspective taking and contrasted brain activation for other- versus self-perspective judgements. This produced a conceptual gap to theory of mind studies, where researchers mainly compared activation for taking another's mental perspective to non-mental control conditions. We compared brain activation for visual perspective taking to activation for non-mental control conditions where the avatar was replaced by directional (arrow, lamp) or non-directional (brick-wall) objects. We found domain-specific activation linked to the avatar's visual perspective in right TPJ, ventral mPFC and ventral precuneus. Interestingly, we found that these areas are spontaneously processing information linked to the other's perspective during self-perspective judgements. Based on a review of the visual perspective taking literature, we discuss how these findings can explain some of the inconsistent/negative results found in previous studies comparing other- versus self-perspective judgements.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Automatic; Mentalizing; Precuneus; Spontaneous; TPJ; Theory of mind; Visual perspective taking; mPFC

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25907759     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  19 in total

Review 1.  The social neuroscience of mentalizing: challenges and recommendations.

Authors:  Dorit Kliemann; Ralph Adolphs
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychol       Date:  2018-02-27

2.  Do implicit and explicit belief processing share neural substrates?

Authors:  Claire K Naughtin; Kristina Horne; Dana Schneider; Dustin Venini; Ashley York; Paul E Dux
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-23       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Visual perspective-taking in complex natural scenes.

Authors:  Paola Del Sette; Markus Bindemann; Heather J Ferguson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2021-10-25       Impact factor: 2.138

4.  From gaze cueing to perspective taking: Revisiting the claim that we automatically compute where or what other people are looking at.

Authors:  Henryk Bukowski; Jari K Hietanen; Dana Samson
Journal:  Vis cogn       Date:  2016-01-24

5.  Brain stimulation reveals crucial role of overcoming self-centeredness in self-control.

Authors:  Alexander Soutschek; Christian C Ruff; Tina Strombach; Tobias Kalenscher; Philippe N Tobler
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 14.136

6.  An objective neural signature of rapid perspective taking.

Authors:  Alexy A Beck; Bruno Rossion; Dana Samson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Causal evidence for task-specific involvement of the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex in human social cognition.

Authors:  Andrew K Martin; Ilvana Dzafic; Swathi Ramdave; Marcus Meinzer
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.436

8.  Neural Correlates of a Perspective-taking Task Using in a Realistic Three-dimmensional Environment Based Task: A Pilot Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Authors:  Sri Mahavir Agarwal; Venkataram Shivakumar; Sunil V Kalmady; Vijay Danivas; Anekal C Amaresha; Anushree Bose; Janardhanan C Narayanaswamy; Michel-Ange Amorim; Ganesan Venkatasubramanian
Journal:  Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.582

9.  Submentalizing or mentalizing in a Level 1 perspective-taking task: A cloak and goggles test.

Authors:  Jane R Conway; Danna Lee; Mobin Ojaghi; Caroline Catmur; Geoffrey Bird
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 10.  An evaluation of neurocognitive models of theory of mind.

Authors:  Matthias Schurz; Josef Perner
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.