Stella Blasel1, Andrea Zagorcic1, Alina Jurcoane1, Oliver Bähr2, Marlies Wagner1, Patrick N Harter3, Elke Hattingen1. 1. Institute of Neuroradiology, Goethe-University Hospital Frankfurt, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt, Germany. 2. Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Neurooncology, Goethe-University Hospital Frankfurt, Schleusenweg 2-16, 60528, Frankfurt, Germany. 3. Edinger Institute, Institute of Neurology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Heinrich Hoffmann Strasse 7, 60528, Frankfurt, Germany.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Treatment-related changes (TRC) often imitate tumor progression in glioblastomas. Increased regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV) can differentiate tumor progression from TRC after the standardized first-line radiochemotherapy, but information about diagnostic accuracy of rCBV for patients without any clinical selection criteria is limited. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate if rCBV can differentiate between TRC and tumor progression irrespective of preceding therapies and number of tumor progressions. METHODS: We analyzed mean and maximum rCBV from the enhancing areas normalized to the contralateral white matter in 44 pretreated glioblastomas with MR-morphological tumor progression. The diagnosis (real progression vs. TRC) was determined by histopathology or by clinical/MRI-follow-up. We performed nonparametric tests, receiver operating characteristics (ROC), and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Significant differences between tumor progression (N = 37) and TRC (N = 7) were found for rCBVmean (2.44 ± 1.05 vs. 1.69 ± .56, P < .03) and rCBVmax (3.40 ± 1.25 vs. 2.21 ± .62, P < .0007). A rCBVmax of 2.6 had 78% sensitivity and 86% specificity to detect tumor progression. Neither rCBVmean nor rCBVmax was predictive for the patient overall survival (OS). There were no statistically different rCBVmean and rCBVmax between the first and further tumor progressions. CONCLUSIONS: The rCBVmax differentiates tumor progression from TRC in unselected recurrent glioblastomas, but it is not predictive for the OS.
PURPOSE: Treatment-related changes (TRC) often imitate tumor progression in glioblastomas. Increased regional cerebral blood volume (rCBV) can differentiate tumor progression from TRC after the standardized first-line radiochemotherapy, but information about diagnostic accuracy of rCBV for patients without any clinical selection criteria is limited. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate if rCBV can differentiate between TRC and tumor progression irrespective of preceding therapies and number of tumor progressions. METHODS: We analyzed mean and maximum rCBV from the enhancing areas normalized to the contralateral white matter in 44 pretreated glioblastomas with MR-morphological tumor progression. The diagnosis (real progression vs. TRC) was determined by histopathology or by clinical/MRI-follow-up. We performed nonparametric tests, receiver operating characteristics (ROC), and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Significant differences between tumor progression (N = 37) and TRC (N = 7) were found for rCBVmean (2.44 ± 1.05 vs. 1.69 ± .56, P < .03) and rCBVmax (3.40 ± 1.25 vs. 2.21 ± .62, P < .0007). A rCBVmax of 2.6 had 78% sensitivity and 86% specificity to detect tumor progression. Neither rCBVmean nor rCBVmax was predictive for the patient overall survival (OS). There were no statistically different rCBVmean and rCBVmax between the first and further tumor progressions. CONCLUSIONS: The rCBVmax differentiates tumor progression from TRC in unselected recurrent glioblastomas, but it is not predictive for the OS.
Authors: Robert H Press; Jim Zhong; Saumya S Gurbani; Brent D Weinberg; Bree R Eaton; Hyunsuk Shim; Hui-Kuo G Shu Journal: Neurosurgery Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 4.654
Authors: J Khalifa; F Tensaouti; L Chaltiel; J-A Lotterie; I Catalaa; M P Sunyach; D Ibarrola; G Noël; G Truc; P Walker; N Magné; M Charissoux; S Ken; P Peran; I Berry; E Cohen-Jonathan Moyal; A Laprie Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2016-02-02 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Eike Steidl; Karl-Josef Langen; Sarah Abu Hmeidan; Nenad Polomac; Christian P Filss; Norbert Galldiks; Philipp Lohmann; Fee Keil; Katharina Filipski; Felix M Mottaghy; Nadim Jon Shah; Joachim P Steinbach; Elke Hattingen; Gabriele D Maurer Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2020-11-26 Impact factor: 9.236