AIMS: Assess the steady-state pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of once-daily (q.d.) versus twice-daily (b.i.d.) dosing with canagliflozin at the same total daily doses of 100 and 300 mg in healthy participants. METHODS: 34 participants (17 in each cohort) were enrolled in this single-center, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-cohort, 2-way crossover study. Participants in each cohort received a total daily dose of either 100 or 300 mg canagliflozin for 5 days with q.d. then b.i.d. dosing or vice versa. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed on day 5 of each period. RESULTS: The canagliflozin Cmax,ss of 100 and 300 mg q.d. dosing were higher by 66% and 72% than corresponding morning Cmax,ss of the 50 mg and 150 mg b.i.d. regimen, respectively. The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of b.i.d./q.d. for AUC0-24h,ss at total doses of 100 and 300 mg were 97.08 (94.08; 99.62) and 99.32 (94.71; 104.16) respectively. Median tmax and mean t1/2 were independent of dose and regimen. Mean (SE) 24-h mean renal glucose threshold values for b.i.d. and q.d. regimens were 59.2 (1.03) and 60.2 (1.03) mg/dL for the 100 mg daily doses and 51.0 (1.04) and 52.5 (1.04) mg/dL for the 300 mg daily doses. Mean (SE) values of 24-h urinary glucose excretion for b.i.d. and q.d. regimens were 52.8 (1.94) and 48.6 (1.94) g for the 100 mg daily doses and 58.6 (3.81) and 57.8 (3.81) g for the 300 mg daily doses. Both doses were safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION:Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of canagliflozin administered q.d. relative to b.i.d. at the same 100 and 300 mg total daily doses were comparable. Overall, canagliflozin was well tolerated.
RCT Entities:
AIMS: Assess the steady-state pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and safety of once-daily (q.d.) versus twice-daily (b.i.d.) dosing with canagliflozin at the same total daily doses of 100 and 300 mg in healthy participants. METHODS: 34 participants (17 in each cohort) were enrolled in this single-center, open-label, multiple-dose, 2-cohort, 2-way crossover study. Participants in each cohort received a total daily dose of either 100 or 300 mg canagliflozin for 5 days with q.d. then b.i.d. dosing or vice versa. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics were assessed on day 5 of each period. RESULTS: The canagliflozinCmax,ss of 100 and 300 mg q.d. dosing were higher by 66% and 72% than corresponding morning Cmax,ss of the 50 mg and 150 mg b.i.d. regimen, respectively. The geometric mean ratios (90% CI) of b.i.d./q.d. for AUC0-24h,ss at total doses of 100 and 300 mg were 97.08 (94.08; 99.62) and 99.32 (94.71; 104.16) respectively. Median tmax and mean t1/2 were independent of dose and regimen. Mean (SE) 24-h mean renal glucose threshold values for b.i.d. and q.d. regimens were 59.2 (1.03) and 60.2 (1.03) mg/dL for the 100 mg daily doses and 51.0 (1.04) and 52.5 (1.04) mg/dL for the 300 mg daily doses. Mean (SE) values of 24-h urinary glucose excretion for b.i.d. and q.d. regimens were 52.8 (1.94) and 48.6 (1.94) g for the 100 mg daily doses and 58.6 (3.81) and 57.8 (3.81) g for the 300 mg daily doses. Both doses were safe and well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of canagliflozin administered q.d. relative to b.i.d. at the same 100 and 300 mg total daily doses were comparable. Overall, canagliflozin was well tolerated.
Authors: Willem de Winter; Adrian Dunne; Xavier Woot de Trixhe; Damayanthi Devineni; Chyi-Hung Hsu; Jose Pinheiro; David Polidori Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2017-01-31 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Meng-Hsiung Hsieh; Joshua H Choe; Jashkaran Gadhvi; Yoon Jung Kim; Marcus A Arguez; Madison Palmer; Haleigh Gerold; Chance Nowak; Hung Do; Simbarashe Mazambani; Jordan K Knighton; Matthew Cha; Justin Goodwin; Min Kyu Kang; Ji Yun Jeong; Shin Yup Lee; Brandon Faubert; Zhenyu Xuan; E Dale Abel; Claudio Scafoglio; David B Shackelford; John D Minna; Pankaj K Singh; Vladimir Shulaev; Leonidas Bleris; Kenneth Hoyt; James Kim; Masahiro Inoue; Ralph J DeBerardinis; Tae Hoon Kim; Jung-Whan Kim Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2019-08-13 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Ghazaleh Behnammanesh; Giovanna L Durante; Yash P Khanna; Kelly J Peyton; William Durante Journal: Redox Biol Date: 2020-04-02 Impact factor: 11.799
Authors: Margaret Nalugo; Nikolai Harroun; Chenglong Li; Larisa Belaygorod; Clay F Semenkovich; Mohamed A Zayed Journal: Vasc Med Date: 2020-10-23 Impact factor: 3.239
Authors: Ghazaleh Behnammanesh; Zane E Durante; Kelly J Peyton; Luis A Martinez-Lemus; Scott M Brown; Shawn B Bender; William Durante Journal: Front Pharmacol Date: 2019-04-16 Impact factor: 5.810