Alison Riese1, Michael J Mello2, Janette Baird2, Dale W Steele3, Megan L Ranney2. 1. Injury Prevention Center of Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI; Pediatrics, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI. Electronic address: ariese@lifespan.org. 2. Injury Prevention Center of Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI; Department of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI. 3. Department of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI; Pediatrics, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Youth violence (YV) screening during primary care visits is not routinely performed. Electronic previsit questionnaires (PVQs) are viewed favorably by adolescents and can prompt disclosure and discussion of sensitive health topics. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of an electronic PVQ in prompting YV discussions. METHODS: A 4-month cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in a large urban academic primary care clinic. The clinic's 4 practice groups were randomized to intervention or control assignment. A consecutive sample of adolescents aged 13 to 19 years presenting for annual visits were recruited. Participants completed an electronic PVQ (TickiT) either with (intervention) or without (control) YV questions. PVQ results were delivered to physicians before the visit. The frequency of YV discussions was measured using exit surveys of adolescents. Patients who reported YV discussion rated the helpfulness of the discussion. Multilevel mixed effect logistic regression was conducted to compare likelihood of YV discussion between intervention and control groups. RESULTS: A total of 183 adolescents (90% of eligible) participated. Overall, 30% of adolescents reported some YV involvement. Sixty-five percent of the intervention group and 42% of the control group reported discussing YV during their visit. Thirty-one percent of adolescents in the intervention group who disclosed YV involvement reported not having a YV discussion. The intervention group had 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.2-5.6) times the odds of discussing YV. Sixty-six percent of adolescents who discussed YV with their doctor rated the discussion as very helpful. CONCLUSIONS: An electronic PVQ with items related to YV is acceptable and feasible, and it significantly improves frequency of patient-provider YV discussion.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Youth violence (YV) screening during primary care visits is not routinely performed. Electronic previsit questionnaires (PVQs) are viewed favorably by adolescents and can prompt disclosure and discussion of sensitive health topics. This study aimed to determine the efficacy of an electronic PVQ in prompting YV discussions. METHODS: A 4-month cluster-randomized controlled trial was conducted in a large urban academic primary care clinic. The clinic's 4 practice groups were randomized to intervention or control assignment. A consecutive sample of adolescents aged 13 to 19 years presenting for annual visits were recruited. Participants completed an electronic PVQ (TickiT) either with (intervention) or without (control) YV questions. PVQ results were delivered to physicians before the visit. The frequency of YV discussions was measured using exit surveys of adolescents. Patients who reported YV discussion rated the helpfulness of the discussion. Multilevel mixed effect logistic regression was conducted to compare likelihood of YV discussion between intervention and control groups. RESULTS: A total of 183 adolescents (90% of eligible) participated. Overall, 30% of adolescents reported some YV involvement. Sixty-five percent of the intervention group and 42% of the control group reported discussing YV during their visit. Thirty-one percent of adolescents in the intervention group who disclosed YV involvement reported not having a YV discussion. The intervention group had 2.6 (95% confidence interval 1.2-5.6) times the odds of discussing YV. Sixty-six percent of adolescents who discussed YV with their doctor rated the discussion as very helpful. CONCLUSIONS: An electronic PVQ with items related to YV is acceptable and feasible, and it significantly improves frequency of patient-provider YV discussion.
Authors: Megan L Ranney; John V Patena; Shira Dunsiger; Anthony Spirito; Rebecca M Cunningham; Edward Boyer; Nicole R Nugent Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2019-05-23 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Chris Gibbons; Ian Porter; Daniela C Gonçalves-Bradley; Stanimir Stoilov; Ignacio Ricci-Cabello; Elena Tsangaris; Jaheeda Gangannagaripalli; Antoinette Davey; Elizabeth J Gibbons; Anna Kotzeva; Jonathan Evans; Philip J van der Wees; Evangelos Kontopantelis; Joanne Greenhalgh; Peter Bower; Jordi Alonso; Jose M Valderas Journal: Cochrane Database Syst Rev Date: 2021-10-12
Authors: Sion K Harris; Matthew C Aalsma; Elissa R Weitzman; Diego Garcia-Huidobro; Charlene Wong; Scott E Hadland; John Santelli; M Jane Park; Elizabeth M Ozer Journal: J Adolesc Health Date: 2016-12-20 Impact factor: 5.012
Authors: Garret G Zieve; Laura P Richardson; Katherine Katzman; Heather Spielvogle; Sandy Whitehouse; Carolyn A McCarty Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2017-07-20 Impact factor: 5.428