Literature DB >> 25906684

Oculomotor behavior of blind patients seeing with a subretinal visual implant.

Ziad M Hafed1, Katarina Stingl2, Karl-Ulrich Bartz-Schmidt3, Florian Gekeler4, Eberhart Zrenner5.   

Abstract

Electronic implants are able to restore some visual function in blind patients with hereditary retinal degenerations. Subretinal visual implants, such as the CE-approved Retina Implant Alpha IMS (Retina Implant AG, Reutlingen, Germany), sense light through the eye's optics and subsequently stimulate retinal bipolar cells via ∼1500 independent pixels to project visual signals to the brain. Because these devices are directly implanted beneath the fovea, they potentially harness the full benefit of eye movements to scan scenes and fixate objects. However, so far, the oculomotor behavior of patients using subretinal implants has not been characterized. Here, we tracked eye movements in two blind patients seeing with a subretinal implant, and we compared them to those of three healthy controls. We presented bright geometric shapes on a dark background, and we asked the patients to report seeing them or not. We found that once the patients visually localized the shapes, they fixated well and exhibited classic oculomotor fixational patterns, including the generation of microsaccades and ocular drifts. Further, we found that a reduced frequency of saccades and microsaccades was correlated with loss of visibility. Last, but not least, gaze location corresponded to the location of the stimulus, and shape and size aspects of the viewed stimulus were reflected by the direction and size of saccades. Our results pave the way for future use of eye tracking in subretinal implant patients, not only to understand their oculomotor behavior, but also to design oculomotor training strategies that can help improve their quality of life.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fixational eye movements; Gaze fixation; Microsaccades; Retina Implant Alpha IMS; Retinitis pigmentosa; Subretinal electronic implant

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25906684     DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2015.04.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  11 in total

1.  Contrast Sensitivity With a Subretinal Prosthesis and Implications for Efficient Delivery of Visual Information.

Authors:  Georges Goetz; Richard Smith; Xin Lei; Ludwig Galambos; Theodore Kamins; Keith Mathieson; Alexander Sher; Daniel Palanker
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 2.  Electronic approaches to restoration of sight.

Authors:  G A Goetz; D V Palanker
Journal:  Rep Prog Phys       Date:  2016-08-09

3.  Restoring Sight with Retinal Prostheses.

Authors:  Daniel Palanker; Georges Goetz
Journal:  Phys Today       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.000

4.  Microsaccades in Applied Environments: Real-World Applications of Fixational Eye Movement Measurements.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  J Eye Mov Res       Date:  2020-05-15       Impact factor: 0.957

5.  Gaze Compensation as a Technique for Improving Hand-Eye Coordination in Prosthetic Vision.

Authors:  Samuel A Titchener; Mohit N Shivdasani; James B Fallon; Matthew A Petoe
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.283

Review 6.  Microsaccade Characteristics in Neurological and Ophthalmic Disease.

Authors:  Robert G Alexander; Stephen L Macknik; Susana Martinez-Conde
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 7.  Eye Movement Compensation and Spatial Updating in Visual Prosthetics: Mechanisms, Limitations and Future Directions.

Authors:  Nadia Paraskevoudi; John S Pezaris
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2019-02-01

Review 8.  Micro/Nano Technologies for High-Density Retinal Implant.

Authors:  Qi Zeng; Saisai Zhao; Hangao Yang; Yi Zhang; Tianzhun Wu
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-22       Impact factor: 2.891

9.  Optoelectronic Devices for Vision Restoration.

Authors:  Victor Wang; Ajay E Kuriyan
Journal:  Curr Ophthalmol Rep       Date:  2020-04-20

10.  Spatiotemporal Pixelization to Increase the Recognition Score of Characters for Retinal Prostheses.

Authors:  Hyun Seok Kim; Kwang Suk Park
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.