| Literature DB >> 25906185 |
Shrinivas Darak1, Melinda Mills2, Vinay Kulkarni3, Sanjeevani Kulkarni3, Inge Hutter4, Fanny Janssen5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: HIV infection closely relates to and deeply affects the reproductive career of those infected. However, little is known about the reproductive career trajectories, specifically the interaction of the timing of HIV diagnosis with the timing and sequencing of reproductive events among HIV infected women. This is the first study to describe and typify this interaction.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25906185 PMCID: PMC4408012 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124537
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Description of states used in the analysis.
| HIV diagnosis states | Code | Marital status | Awareness of HIV status | Childbearing |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neither she nor her husband is tested for HIV and hence are unaware (NA) of their HIV status | (M-NA-P0) | Married | Not Aware | Parity 0 |
| (M-NA-P1) | Married | Not Aware | Parity 1 | |
| (M-NA-P2+) | Married | Not Aware | Parity 2+ | |
| One of the couple (A1) (either she or her husband) is tested HIV positive and aware about his/her HIV status. | (M-A1-P0) | Married | One partner positive | Parity 0 |
| (M-A1-P1) | Married | One partner positive | Parity 1 | |
| (M-A1-P2+) | Married | One partner positive | Parity 2+ | |
| Both she and her husband are tested HIV positive and are aware about it-concordant (C) | (M-C-P0) | Married | Concordant | Parity 0 |
| (M-C-P1) | Married | Concordant | Parity 1 | |
| (M-C-P2+) | Married | Concordant | Parity 2+ | |
| She is tested HIV positive and her husband is tested HIV negative and both are aware about their respective HIV statuses- Discordant (D) | (M-D-P0) | Married | Discordant | Parity 0 |
| (M-D-P0) | Married | Discordant | Parity 1 | |
| (M-D-P0) | Married | Discordant | Parity 2+ | |
| She is not tested for HIV and hence not aware (NA) about her HIV status | (W-NA) | Widow | Not Aware | Not considered |
| She is tested HIV positive and aware about it | (W-A) | Widow | Aware | Not considered |
| U | Unmarried | Not applicable |
Profile of HIV infected women in the study (N = 622).
| Variable | Category | N | % | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Demographic factors | Age at marriage | < = 17 year | 277 | 44.5 |
| 18–21 years | 230 | 37.0 | ||
| > = 22 years | 115 | 18.5 | ||
| Education | No schooling or Primary | 216 | 34.7 | |
| Secondary or Higher | 406 | 65.3 | ||
| Socio-economic class | Upper | 339 | 54.5 | |
| Lower | 283 | 45.5 | ||
| Place of residence | Urban | 364 | 58.5 | |
| Rural | 258 | 41.5 | ||
| Age difference with husband (husband older than woman) | 0–4 years | 156 | 25.1 | |
| 5–8 years | 249 | 40.0 | ||
| = < 9 years | 217 | 34.9 | ||
| Marital factors | Marital status at interview | Living as married | 366 | 58.8 |
| Divorced | 6 | 1.0 | ||
| Widowed | 235 | 37.8 | ||
| Separated | 15 | 2.4 | ||
| Ever had live birth | Yes | 548 | 88.1 | |
| No | 74 | 11.9 | ||
| Ever use of contraception | Female sterilization | 239 | 38.4 | |
| Condom | 449 | 72.2 | ||
| Pill | 112 | 18.0 | ||
| IUD | 116 | 18.6 | ||
| Emergency pills | 15 | 2.4 | ||
| HIV related factors | Reason of women’s HIV testing | During ANC | 190 | 30.5 |
| Husband tested positive | 212 | 34.1 | ||
| Illness | 147 | 23.6 | ||
| Other | 73 | 11.7 | ||
| Age of women’s at testing | <19 | 66 | 10.6 | |
| 20–24 | 192 | 30.9 | ||
| 25–29 | 192 | 30.9 | ||
| >30 | 172 | 27.7 | ||
| Husband’s HIV status | Infected | 494 | 79.4 | |
| Un-infected | 48 | 7.7 | ||
| Not tested/don’t know | 80 | 12.9 | ||
| Year of HIV diagnosis (women) | Before 2000 | 117 | 18.8 | |
| 2001–2005 | 262 | 42.1 | ||
| 2006–2011 | 243 | 39.1 |
Description of sample of women in each identified cluster (Total N = 622) with respect to variables in multinomial regression model.
| HIV diagnosis concurrent with childbearing | HIV diagnosis after childbearing | HIV diagnosis after husband’s death | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables | N | % | N | % | N | % | N | % |
|
| ||||||||
| < = 17 years | 65 | 26 | 119 | 59 | 93 | 55 | 277 | 45 |
| 18–21 years | 101 | 40 | 72 | 36 | 57 | 34 | 230 | 37 |
| > = 22 years | 87 | 34 | 9 | 5 | 19 | 11 | 115 | 18 |
|
| ||||||||
| No education or primary school |
|
|
| 45 | 77 | 46 | 216 | 35 |
| Secondary or higher school | 204 | 81 | 110 | 55 | 92 | 54 | 406 | 65 |
|
| ||||||||
| Urban | 168 | 66 | 110 | 55 | 86 | 51 | 364 | 58.5 |
| Rural | 85 | 34 | 90 | 45 | 83 | 49 | 258 | 41.5 |
|
| ||||||||
| Before 2000 | 37 | 15 | 27 | 13 | 53 | 31 | 117 | 19 |
| 2001–2005 | 107 | 42 | 77 | 39 | 78 | 46 | 262 | 42 |
| 2006–2011 | 109 | 43 | 96 | 48 | 38 | 23 | 243 | 39 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relative risk according to statistically significant demographic variables of belonging into one of the identified clusters (reference group: HIV diagnosis concurrent with childbearing).
| HIV diagnosis after childbearing | HIV diagnosis after husband’s death | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variables |
| 95% CI |
| 95% CI |
|
| ||||
| < = 17 years | 13.12 | (5.93–29.05) | 3.82 | (1.94–7.51) |
| 18–21 years | 6.35 | (2.99–13.50) | 2.20 | (1.19–4.08) |
| > = 22 years (Ref) | 1 | - | - | - |
|
| ||||
| No education or primary school | 1.67 | (1.03–2.71) | 2.42 | (1.43–4.08) |
| Secondary or higher school (Ref) | 1 | - | - | - |
|
| ||||
| Urban | 0.86 | (0.57–1.31) | 0.63 | (0.41–0.98) |
| Rural (Ref) | 1 | - | - | - |
|
| ||||
| Before 2000 | 0.97 | (0.53–1.79) | 5.21 | (2.85–9.53) |
| 2001–2005 | 0.84 | (0.54–1.30) | 2.20 | (1.33–3.63) |
| 2006–2011 (Ref) | 1 | - | - | - |
Notes: Cox and Snell R2 = 0.222;
*p<0.05;
** p<0.01;
RR = Risk Ratios.
Fig 1Clustered typologies of reproductive career trajectories of ever married HIV infected Indian women (N = 622).
U- unmarried; M-married; W-widowed; NA-both the woman and her husband are not aware of their HIV status; A1–only one partner is aware of his/her HIV status; C-concordant (the woman and her husband are known HIV infected); D-discordant (only woman is known HIV infected and husband is HIV uninfected); P0- parity zero; P1-parity one; P2+-parity two and over. See Table 1 for a detailed description of the different states.
Fig 2Representative sequences within each identified cluster.
U- unmarried; M-married; W-widowed; NA-both the woman and her husband are not aware of their HIV status; A1–only one partner is aware of his/her HIV status; C-concordant (the woman and her husband are known HIV infected); D-discordant (only woman is known HIV infected and husband is HIV uninfected); P0- parity zero; P1-parity one; P2+-parity two and over. See Table 1 for a detailed description of the different states.