Literature DB >> 25906123

The Novel Marker GATA3 is Significantly More Sensitive Than Traditional Markers Mammaglobin and GCDFP15 for Identifying Breast Cancer in Surgical and Cytology Specimens of Metastatic and Matched Primary Tumors.

Ankur R Sangoi1, Bijayee Shrestha, George Yang, Ourhay Mego, Andrew H Beck.   

Abstract

Traditional markers mammaglobin and GCDFP15 show good specificity but lack sensitivity and can be difficult to interpret in small tissue samples. We undertook a comparative study of the novel nuclear marker GATA3 (expression typically restricted to breast and urothelial carcinomas) and GCDFP15 and mammaglobin. We first compared quantitative mRNA expression levels of these 3 markers across a diverse set of over 6000 tumors and 500 normal samples from The Cancer Genome Atlas which showed dramatically higher GATA3 expression (>10-fold higher) in breast cancer as compared with GCDFP15 or mammaglobin (both P<2.2e-16), suggesting that GATA3 may represent a more sensitive marker of breast cancer than GCDFP15 or mammaglobin. We next examined protein expression by immunohistochemistry in 166 cases (including surgical and cytology specimens) of metastatic breast carcinoma and 54 cases with available matched primaries. One whole-slide section from each case was stained for monoclonal GATA3 (L50-823), monoclonal mammaglobin (31A5), and monoclonal GCDFP15 (EP1582Y). Staining intensity (0 to 3+) and extent (0% to 100%) were scored with an H-score calculated (range, 0 to 300). Sensitivities by varying H-score cutoffs for a positive result in metastatic breast carcinoma among GATA3/GCDFP15/mammaglobin, respectively, were as follows: any H-score=95%/65%/78%, H-score>50=93%/37%/47%, H-score>100=90%/25%/27%, H-score>150=86%/21%/19%, H-score>200=73%/18%/9%, H-score>250=66%/14%/6%. Significant staining differences by specimen type, tumor subtype/grade, or ER/PR/HER2 status were not identified. Significantly stronger correlation was observed between primary/metastatic GATA3 expression [Pearson's correlation=0.81 (0.68-0.89)] as compared with the primary/metastatic correlations of GCDFP15 [Pearson's correlation=0.57 (0.33-0.74)] and mammaglobin [Pearson's correlation=0.50 (0.24-0.70)] (both P<0.05). In conclusion, the novel marker GATA3 stains a significantly higher proportion of both primary and metastatic breast carcinomas than GCDFP15 or mammaglobin with stronger and more diffuse staining, helpful in cases with small tissue samples. The matched primary/metastatic expression of GATA3 is also more consistent. We propose that GATA3 be included among a panel of confirmatory markers for metastatic breast carcinoma.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 25906123      PMCID: PMC5610542          DOI: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000000186

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol        ISSN: 1533-4058


  21 in total

1.  Diagnostic utility and sensitivities of GATA3 antibodies in triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Gregor Krings; Michael Nystrom; Irum Mehdi; Poonam Vohra; Yunn-Yi Chen
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2014-07-17       Impact factor: 3.466

2.  Mammaglobin vs GCDFP-15: an immunohistologic validation survey for sensitivity and specificity.

Authors:  Rohit Bhargava; Sushil Beriwal; David J Dabbs
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.493

3.  Immunohistochemical evaluation of GATA3 expression in tumors and normal tissues: a useful immunomarker for breast and urothelial carcinomas.

Authors:  Haiyan Liu; Jianhui Shi; Myra L Wilkerson; Fan Lin
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  GATA-3 expression as a predictor of hormone response in breast cancer.

Authors:  Purvi Parikh; Juan P Palazzo; Lewis J Rose; Constantine Daskalakis; Ronald J Weigel
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 6.113

5.  Diagnostic utility of immunohistochemistry in distinguishing between epithelioid pleural mesotheliomas and breast carcinomas: a comparative study.

Authors:  Nelson G Ordóñez; Aysegul A Sahin
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 3.466

6.  GATA3 expression in breast carcinoma: utility in triple-negative, sarcomatoid, and metastatic carcinomas.

Authors:  Ashley Cimino-Mathews; Andrea P Subhawong; Peter B Illei; Rajni Sharma; Marc K Halushka; Russell Vang; John H Fetting; Ben Ho Park; Pedram Argani
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 3.466

7.  Differential expression of GATA-3 in urothelial carcinoma variants.

Authors:  Yu Liang; Joseph Heitzman; Ashish M Kamat; Colin P Dinney; Bogdan Czerniak; Charles C Guo
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2014-03-15       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  Placental S100 (S100P) and GATA3: markers for transitional epithelium and urothelial carcinoma discovered by complementary DNA microarray.

Authors:  John P T Higgins; Gulsah Kaygusuz; Lingli Wang; Kelli Montgomery; Veronica Mason; Shirley X Zhu; Robert J Marinelli; Joseph C Presti; Matt van de Rijn; James D Brooks
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 6.394

9.  GATA3: a multispecific but potentially useful marker in surgical pathology: a systematic analysis of 2500 epithelial and nonepithelial tumors.

Authors:  Markku Miettinen; Peter A McCue; Maarit Sarlomo-Rikala; Janusz Rys; Piotr Czapiewski; Krzysztof Wazny; Renata Langfort; Piotr Waloszczyk; Wojciech Biernat; Jerzy Lasota; Zengfeng Wang
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 6.394

10.  Comparative Sensitivities and Specificities of Antibodies to Breast Markers GCDFP-15, Mammaglobin A, and Different Clones of Antibodies to GATA-3: A Study of 338 Tumors Using Whole Sections.

Authors:  Patricia L Kandalaft; Rochelle A Simon; Christina Isacson; Allen M Gown
Journal:  Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol       Date:  2016-10
View more
  8 in total

1.  Breast Microcalcifications as the Only Imaging Manifestation of Metastatic Serous Peritoneal Adenocarcinoma in the Breast.

Authors:  Mary Moon-Sun Liang; Sze Yiun Teo; Mihir Gudi; Swee Ho Lim; Thida Win
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2019-10-31

Review 2.  Metastases to the Thyroid Gland: What Can We Do?

Authors:  Qiushi Tang; Zhihong Wang
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-19       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Immunocytochemistry of effusions: Processing and commonly used immunomarkers.

Authors:  Vinod B Shidham; Beata Janikowski
Journal:  Cytojournal       Date:  2022-01-31       Impact factor: 2.345

4.  Pancreatic metastasis from invasive pleomorphic lobular carcinoma of the breast: a rare case report.

Authors:  Xiangjie Sun; Ke Zuo; Dan Huang; Baohua Yu; Yufan Cheng; Wentao Yang
Journal:  Diagn Pathol       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 2.644

5.  Complete response to orally administered melphalan in malignant pleural effusion from an occult female genital organ primary neoplasm with BRCA1/2 mutations: a case report.

Authors:  Frank S Fan; Chung-Fan Yang
Journal:  J Med Case Rep       Date:  2018-05-06

6.  Integrative analysis reveals methylenetetrahydrofolate dehydrogenase 1-like as an independent shared diagnostic and prognostic biomarker in five different human cancers.

Authors:  Nuzhat Sial; Jalil Ur Rehman; Saba Saeed; Mukhtiar Ahmad; Yasir Hameed; Muhammad Atif; Abdul Rehman; Rizwan Asif; Hamad Ahmed; Muhammad Safdar Hussain; Muhammad Rashid Khan; Atifa Ambreen; Ayesha Ambreen
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2022-01-28       Impact factor: 3.840

7.  Ovarian carcinoma initially presenting as breast cancer two years prior to diagnosis: A case report and review of literature.

Authors:  Lisa A Rauh; Mark P Lachiewicz; Alan N Gordon
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-12-30

8.  Preferential expression of NY-BR-1 and GATA-3 in male breast cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni Battista Biserni; Enrico Di Oto; Linda Eszter Moskovszky; Maria Pia Foschini; Zsuzsanna Varga
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 4.553

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.