We have shown previously that the bleomycin (BLM) carbohydrate moiety can recapitulate the tumor cell targeting effects of the entire BLM molecule, that BLM itself is modular in nature consisting of a DNA-cleaving aglycone which is delivered selectively to the interior of tumor cells by its carbohydrate moiety, and that there are disaccharides structurally related to the BLM disaccharide which are more efficient than the natural disaccharide at tumor cell targeting/uptake. Because BLM sugars can deliver molecular cargoes selectively to tumor cells, and thus potentially form the basis for a novel antitumor strategy, it seemed important to consider additional structural features capable of affecting the efficiency of tumor cell recognition and delivery. These included the effects of sugar polyvalency and net charge (at physiological pH) on tumor cell recognition, internalization, and trafficking. Since these parameters have been shown to affect cell surface recognition, internalization, and distribution in other contexts, this study has sought to define the effects of these structural features on tumor cell recognition by bleomycin and its disaccharide. We demonstrate that both can have a significant effect on tumor cell binding/internalization, and present data which suggests that the metal ions normally bound by bleomycin following clinical administration may significantly contribute to the efficiency of tumor cell uptake, in addition to their characterized function in DNA cleavage. A BLM disaccharide-Cy5** conjugate incorporating the positively charged dipeptide d-Lys-d-Lys was found to associate with both the mitochondria and the nuclear envelope of DU145 cells, suggesting possible cellular targets for BLM disaccharide-cytotoxin conjugates.
We have shown previously that the bleomycin (BLM) carbohydrate moiety can recapitulate the tumor cell targeting effects of the entire BLM molecule, that BLM itself is modular in nature consisting of a DNA-cleaving aglycone which is delivered selectively to the interior of tumor cells by its carbohydrate moiety, and that there are disaccharides structurally related to the BLM disaccharide which are more efficient than the natural disaccharide at tumor cell targeting/uptake. Because BLMsugars can deliver molecular cargoes selectively to tumor cells, and thus potentially form the basis for a novel antitumor strategy, it seemed important to consider additional structural features capable of affecting the efficiency of tumor cell recognition and delivery. These included the effects of sugar polyvalency and net charge (at physiological pH) on tumor cell recognition, internalization, and trafficking. Since these parameters have been shown to affect cell surface recognition, internalization, and distribution in other contexts, this study has sought to define the effects of these structural features on tumor cell recognition by bleomycin and its disaccharide. We demonstrate that both can have a significant effect on tumor cell binding/internalization, and present data which suggests that the metal ions normally bound by bleomycin following clinical administration may significantly contribute to the efficiency of tumor cell uptake, in addition to their characterized function in DNA cleavage. A BLM disaccharide-Cy5** conjugate incorporating the positively charged dipeptided-Lys-d-Lys was found to associate with both the mitochondria and the nuclear envelope of DU145 cells, suggesting possible cellular targets for BLM disaccharide-cytotoxin conjugates.
The bleomycins
(Figure 1) are glycopeptide-derived natural
products,[1] which were first identified
as secondary metabolites
from culture broths of Streptomyces verticillus following their isolation as Cu(II) chelates.[1,2] The
bleomycins were shown to possess significant anticancer activity,[3,4] and some of the BLMs are now employed clinically as antitumor agents,
both as single agents and in combination chemotherapy.[5,6] Interestingly, it has also been found that radionuclide complexes
of the bleomycins bind selectively to a variety of tumor cells,[7−14] which likely contributes to their selectivity as antitumor agents.
Redox-active metal complexes of the BLMs mediate oxidative degradation
of DNA producing both single- and double-strand breaks,[15−22] and the double-strand DNA breaks are believed to form the basis
for the antitumor activity of BLM.[23]
Figure 1
(a) Structure
of BLM A5, the highlighted domain shows
the BLM disaccharide. (b) Structures of BLM disaccharide-Cy5** (1) and decarbamoyl BLM disaccharide-Cy5** (2).
(a) Structure
of BLM A5, the highlighted domain shows
the BLM disaccharide. (b) Structures of BLM disaccharide-Cy5** (1) and decarbamoyl BLM disaccharide-Cy5** (2).In recent studies, it has been
shown that the tumor cell selectivity
of the bleomycins resides in the disaccharide moiety, which consists
of l-gulose and 3-O-carbamoyl-d-mannose subunits,[24−26] and that systematic variation of the position and
substitution of the carbamoyl moiety afforded disaccharide analogues
with significantly improved cancer cell binding/uptake.[27] The BLM disaccharide has been shown to be capable
of delivering molecular cargoes to cancer cells, including the cytotoxic
BLMaglycone[28] and dyes such as the cyanine
dye Cy5**.[25,26] As part of an ongoing effort
to develop a practical strategy to use a BLM saccharide as a delivery
vehicle for other therapeutic agents, it seemed of interest to explore
other aspects of this carrier molecule that might increase its efficiency
for selective cargo delivery to tumor cells. In addition, we were
also interested in defining the intracellular distribution of BLM–disaccharide
conjugates. This information might be useful for designing conjugates
that can deliver cargoes to specific intracellular sites.Presently,
we report that a cluster of three BLM disaccharides
exhibited enhanced tumor cell targeting and uptake; such effects of
polyvalency are typical of the involvement of one or more carbohydrate
receptors on the surface of tumor cells. Additionally, it was found
that the addition of Cu(II) to bleomycin A5-Cy5** significantly
increased its efficiency of tumor cell binding/uptake, and that Fe(III)•BLM-Cy5**,
Cu(II)•BLM-Cy5**, Mn(III)•BLM-Cy5**, and Zn(II)•BLM-Cy5**
exhibited binding and uptake in four cultured cancer cell lines, but
not in matched noncancer cell lines. It seemed likely that the enhanced
binding/uptake was due to the positive charge associated with the
chelated metal ions. While the BLM disaccharide lacks the intrinsic
metal ion chelating properties of BLM itself, the introduction of
two lysine residues (the side chains of which are positively charged
at physiological pH) between the disaccharide and Cy5** moieties of
the conjugate also resulted in a significant enhancement in tumor
cell targeting and uptake. These findings have important implications
for the design of tumor selective agents capable of delivering cytotoxic
cargoes to tumor cells, and may also indicate a role for the metal
constituent in tumor cell binding/uptake of metalloBLMs, as well as
the long recognized role of redox-active metals in the activation
of oxygenated metalloBLMs for DNA degradation by this class of drug.
Materials
and Methods
Metallobleomycins
Fe(III)•BLM-Cy5**, Mn(III)•BLM-Cy5**,
and Zn(II)•BLM-Cy5** were prepared by admixture of equimolar
amounts of the respective metal ions to metal free BLM-Cy5**, the
latter of which was synthesized starting from BLM A5 as
described previously.[25] Cu(II)•BLM-Cy5**
is an intermediate in the synthesis of metal free BLM-Cy5**.[25]
Cell Growth Conditions
C6 (ATCC
CCL-107) ratglioma
cells, CTX TNA2 (ATCC CRL-2006) rat astrocytes, SW 1088 (ATCC HTB-12)
humanbrain cancer cells, SVG p12 (ATCC CRL-8621) normal human brain
cells, SW480 (ATCC CCL-228) humancolon cancer cells, and CCD-112CoN
(ATCC CRL-1541) normal human fetal colon cells were grown in MEM medium
(Gibco, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum
(HyClone) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin mix antibiotic supplement.
A549 (ATCC CCL-185) humanlung carcinoma cells, A498 (ATCC HTB-44)
humankidney carcinoma, BxPC-3 (ATCC CRL-1687) humanpancreatic adenocarcinoma,
BT474 (ATCC HTB-20) humanbreast ductal carcinoma cells, and MCF-7
(ATCC HBT-22) humanbreast adenocarcinoma were cultured in RPMI 1640
medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine
serum (HyClone, South Logan, UT) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin
antibiotic mixture (Cellgro, Manassas, VA). MCF-10A (ATCC CRL-10317)
humanfibrocystic breast basal epithelial cells were grown in MEGM
(Invitrogen, Grand Island, NY) medium supplemented with 100 ng/mL
cholera toxin (Sigma-Aldrich) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin
mix antibiotic supplement. DU145 (ATCC HTB-81) humanprostate carcinoma,
WI38 (ATCC CCL-75) human fetal lung fibroblasts, SW1783 (ATCC HTB-13)
human grade III astrocytoma, PZ-HPV-7 (ATCC CRL-2221) human HPV-18
transformed prostate epithelium cells, and RWPE-1 (ATCC CRL-11609)
human HPV-18 transfected prostate epithelium cells were grown in MEM
medium (Gibco, Grand Island, NY) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine
serum (HyClone) and 1% penicillin–streptomycin mix antibiotic
supplement. The cells were incubated at 37 °C under a humidified
atmosphere of 5% CO2 and 95% air.
Fluorescence Microscopy
Fluorescence images were acquired
using a Zeiss Axiovert 200M inverted microscope fitted with an AxioCam
MRm camera equipped with a 300 W xenon lamp (Sutter, Novato, CA),
and Cy5cyanine filter (Chroma, Bellows Falls, VT). The cells were
grown on 16-well Lab-Tek glass chamber slides at a cell density of
5000 cells/well (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA) at 37 °C for
48 h. Cells were rinsed twice with phosphate buffered saline (PBS)
and the medium was replaced with RPMI 1640 (no phenol red) when the
cell density reached 70% confluence. The cells were treated with the
dye-labeled conjugates to the final desired concentration. Cell incubation
was carried out at 37 °C for 1 h, then the cells were washed
with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde at 37 °C for 5 min.
Finally, the slide was mounted with Prolong Antifade Gold reagent
with DAPI (Invitrogen). All images were recorded and the target cells
counted using a 40× oil objective. To ensure accurate intensity
measurements, the exposure time and laser time were kept the same.
Pixel intensity was quantified using AxioVision release
4.7 version software, and the mean pixel intensity was generated as
gray level.
Results
Synthesis of Disaccharide–Dye
Conjugates
The
method used for the preparation of the BLM disaccharide-Cy5** trimer
(3) is outlined in Scheme 1. Key
intermediate 4-(2-tert-butoxycarbonylethyl)-4-nitro-heptanedioic
acid di-tert-butyl ester (7) was obtained
in 91% yield by the condensation of nitromethane with 3 equiv of tert-butyl acrylate (6). Following reduction
of the nitro functional group to an amine over Raney Ni in 92% yield,
the amine was acylated with CBz-β-alanine (98% yield), and the tert-butyl esters were removed in quantitative yield by
treatment with formic acid at room temperature, affording triacid 10 as a colorless oil. The triacid was activated as the tris-N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (11) and then condensed
with the free amine resulting from removal of the CBz protecting group
from 12. Peracetylated BLM-disaccharide trimer (13) was obtained as a colorless oil in 81% overall yield from 11. Following removal of the O-acetyl protecting
groups (NaOMe in MeOH) and the CBz protecting group (H2, Pd/C), condensation with the activated ester of Cy5** (Cy5**COOSu
(14)) afforded BLM disaccharide-Cy5** trimer (3), which was isolated in an overall yield of 15% from 13 after purification by C18 reversed phase HPLC.
Scheme 1
Synthetic
Route Utilized for the Preparation of BLM disaccharide-Cy5**
trimer
The synthetic route used for
preparation of the BLM disaccharide
conjugate incorporating d-Lys-d-Lys (4) is outlined in Scheme 2. Nε-Boc-protected CBz-d-Lys (15) was converted to the respective methyl ester (16)
by treatment with methyl iodide (87% yield) and then the CBz group
was removed by hydrogenolysis over palladium-on-carbon, affording
free amine 17 in 89% yield. Condensation of 15 and 17 then afforded fully protected d-Lys-d-Lys derivative 18 as a colorless oil. Demethylation
(LiOH, aq tetrahydrofuran) provided free acid 19 which
was conjugated to disaccharide 20 via a linker having
an amine functional group. The d-Lys-d-Lys-disaccharide
intermediate 21 was obtained in modest (37%) yield as
a colorless solid. Hydrogenolysis of 21 over palladium-on-carbon,
followed by treatment with Cy5**COOSu (14) in 0.2 M aqsodium phosphate buffer (pH ∼8) gave the bis-Boc-protected
conjugate 22 in low (26%) yield following purification
by C18 reversed phase HPLC. Deprotection using 60% aqueous
CF3COOH, followed by purification using reversed phase
HPLC, then afforded Nα-Cy5**-d-lysyl-d-lysyl-BLM-disaccharide (4) as
a blue solid. The respective conjugate containing l-lysyl-l-lysine (5) was prepared analogously starting
from l-lysine (Scheme S1).
Scheme 2
Synthetic Route Utilized for the Preparation of BLM Disaccharide-d-Lys-d-Lys-Cy5**
Cell Binding/Uptake of Disaccharide–Dye Conjugates
The Cy5** conjugate of the disaccharide moiety of bleomycin has
previously been shown to bind selectively to a number of cultured
cancer cells, but not to normal cell lines of the same general cell
type.[25] The generality of this observation
is critical to a strategy which envisions using the BLM disaccharide
to direct cytotoxic agents selectively to tumor cells. Accordingly,
in the present study additional cancer and matched normal cell lines
were studied. As shown in Figure 2, significant
uptake was observed for monolayer cultures of C6 ratglioma cells
(but not for CTX TNA2 rat astrocyte cells), SW 1088 humanbrain cancer
cells (but not for SVG p12 normal human brain cells), and SW480 colon
cancer cells (but not CCD-112CoNhuman fetal colon cells). Also tested
were BT474 humanbreast ductal carcinoma and SW1783humanastrocytoma
cell lines, both of which exhibited significant binding and uptake
of BLM disaccharide–Cy5** (not shown).
Figure 2
(a) Comparison of binding/uptake
of Cy5** and BLM disaccharide–Cy5**
conjugate (1) in three cancer cell lines. The cells were
treated with 25 μM BLM disaccharide–Cy5** (1) or Cy5** at 37 °C for 1 h, washed with PBS, and fixed with
4% paraformaldehyde. The cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Fluorescence
imaging was carried out after a 2 s exposure. (b) Quantification of
the binding/uptake of BLM disaccharide–Cy5** and Cy5** in three
sets of matched cancer and normal cell lines. The cells were treated
with 25 μM dye (conjugate) and irradiated for 2 s prior to imaging.
(a) Comparison of binding/uptake
of Cy5** and BLM disaccharide–Cy5**
conjugate (1) in three cancer cell lines. The cells were
treated with 25 μM BLM disaccharide–Cy5** (1) or Cy5** at 37 °C for 1 h, washed with PBS, and fixed with
4% paraformaldehyde. The cell nuclei were stained with DAPI. Fluorescence
imaging was carried out after a 2 s exposure. (b) Quantification of
the binding/uptake of BLM disaccharide–Cy5** and Cy5** in three
sets of matched cancer and normal cell lines. The cells were treated
with 25 μM dye (conjugate) and irradiated for 2 s prior to imaging.As noted previously,[27] the presence
of a carbamoyl moiety has been found to be essential for binding/uptake
of the BLM disaccharide–Cy5** conjugate by tumor cells, and
has been documented for several tumor cell lines. The importance of
this characteristic to our proposed therapeutic strategy prompted
the testing of additional tumor cell lines for this property. As illustrated
in Figure 3, the C6 ratglioma and SW1783humanastrocytoma cancer cell lines were shown to share this property with
cancer cell lines tested previously, two of which (DU145human prostate
carcinoma and A549 human lung carcinoma epithelial cells) were again
tested in parallel for verification of earlier findings. As in earlier
experiments, the presence of the carbamoyl moiety on mannose was essential
for binding/uptake.
Figure 3
Quantification of the binding/uptake of BLM disaccharide–Cy5**
(1) and decarbamoyl BLM disaccharide–Cy5** (2) in four cancer cells. The cells were treated with 25 μM
dye conjugates and irradiated for 2 s prior to imaging.
Quantification of the binding/uptake of BLM disaccharide–Cy5**
(1) and decarbamoyl BLM disaccharide–Cy5** (2) in four cancer cells. The cells were treated with 25 μM
dye conjugates and irradiated for 2 s prior to imaging.Another important experiment employed a Cy5** conjugate
tethered
to a trivalent cluster of BLM disaccharides (Figure 4a). As shown in the Figure 4a,c, when
treated with a 25 μM concentration of the trimeric cluster (3, Scheme 1), the binding/uptake of
BLM disaccharide–Cy5** trimer by DU145 cells was almost 3-fold
greater than that of BLM disaccharide–Cy5** and twice that
observed for BLM–Cy5** itself, suggesting the importance of
multivalency in the recognition and internalization of the BLM disaccharide
by cultured tumor cells.
Figure 4
(a) Comparison of the binding/uptake of BLM
disaccharide–Cy5**,
Cy5**, BLM disaccharide–Cy5** trimer (3), and
BLM–Cy5** in DU145 prostate carcinoma cells. (b) Comparison
of the binding/uptake of Cu(II)•BLM-Cy5** and Cu(II)•deglycoBLM-Cy5**
in DU145 prostate carcinoma cells. (c) Quantification of the binding/uptake
of 25 μM dye conjugates in DU145 and PZ-HPV-7 cells. The cells
were treated with 25 μM dye conjugates and irradiated for 2
s prior to imaging.
(a) Comparison of the binding/uptake of BLMdisaccharide–Cy5**,
Cy5**, BLM disaccharide–Cy5** trimer (3), and
BLM–Cy5** in DU145prostate carcinoma cells. (b) Comparison
of the binding/uptake of Cu(II)•BLM-Cy5** and Cu(II)•deglycoBLM-Cy5**
in DU145prostate carcinoma cells. (c) Quantification of the binding/uptake
of 25 μM dye conjugates in DU145 and PZ-HPV-7 cells. The cells
were treated with 25 μM dye conjugates and irradiated for 2
s prior to imaging.Bleomycin is often administered
clinically by injection in metal
free form.[29] However, the drug acts to
cleave DNA as a metal complex with Fe2+,[15,16] or possibly Cu+,[30] and has
long been thought to sequester metal ions soon after i.v. administration.[2] Accordingly, the cellular binding and uptake
of metalloBLMs by DU145 cells was evaluated employing Cu(II)•BLM-Cy5**
(Figure 4b). As shown in the figure, Cu(II)•BLM-Cy5**
associated very efficiently with DU145prostate carcinoma cells. Quantification
of binding/uptake revealed that Cu(II)•BLM-Cy5** was about
twice as efficient as the metal free BLM-Cy5** conjugate, and at least
as efficient as any other conjugate studied (Figure 4b,c). While the analogous experiment using the BLM disaccharide
moiety bound directly to Cu2+ could not be carried out
due to the lack of efficient multidentate ligands for Cu2+ within the disaccharide moiety, the importance of the disaccharide
to DU145prostate cacinoma cell binding/uptake was evaluated by repeating
the same experiment using Cu(II)•deglycoBLM-Cy5**. As shown
in Figure 4b,c, in the absence of the disaccharide
moiety, no significant cell association/uptake was noted.The
effect of bound Fe(III) and Cu(II) on tumor cell binding and
internalization was studied further using four additional cancer cell
lines and matched normal cell lines; the results are summarized in
Figure 5. As shown, Fe(III)•BLM-Cy5**
and Cu(II)•BLM-Cy5** were bound/internalized to the same extent
by MCF-7humanbreast adenocarcinoma, and to a greater extent than
metal-free BLM-Cy5**. None of the conjugates associated to a significant
extent with human breast basal epithelial cells (MCF-10A). Similar
results were noted for A549 lung carcinoma cells and C6 ratglioma
cells, although the addition of Cu(II) or Fe(III) afforded only a
small increase in uptake; again, their matched normal cell lines displayed
little affinity for any of the BLM-Cy5** conjugates. Interestingly,
in an experiment carried out in triplicate, SW1783humanastrocytoma
cells displayed a much greater affinity for Fe(III)•BLM-Cy5**
than for Cu(II)•BLM-Cy5**, although both metalloBLMs still
exhibited a preference for this cancer cell line relative to SVGp12
human fetal SV40 transformed astrocytes. Enhancement of tumor cell
binding/uptake was also documented using Zn(II)[31] and Mn(III)[32] chelates of BLM-Cy5**
(Figure 5), suggesting that the effect is due
primarily to the positive charge common to each of the metal cations
studied. Further, the differences observed between metal free BLM
and individual metalloBLMs, among the various metalloBLMs, and from
one cell line to another with the same species argues that the observed
results cannot be explained via metal ion exchange to afford a common
metalloBLM different from that introduced to the culture medium.
Figure 5
Effect
of metal ions on the internalization of BLM-Cy5** conjugates
in four sets of matched cancer and normal cell lines. The cells were
treated with 25 μM Cu(II)•BLM-Cy5**, Fe(III)•BLM-Cy5**,
Mn(III)•BLM-Cy5**, or Zn(II)•BLM-Cy5** at 37 °C
for 1 h, washed with PBS, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Fluorescence
imaging was carried out with a 2 s exposure time.
Effect
of metal ions on the internalization of BLM-Cy5** conjugates
in four sets of matched cancer and normal cell lines. The cells were
treated with 25 μM Cu(II)•BLM-Cy5**, Fe(III)•BLM-Cy5**,
Mn(III)•BLM-Cy5**, or Zn(II)•BLM-Cy5** at 37 °C
for 1 h, washed with PBS, and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde. Fluorescence
imaging was carried out with a 2 s exposure time.To validate the assumption concerning the effects of the
positive
charge of the metal ions on tumor cell targeting/uptake, and provide
a tool more readily applicable to drug design, two BLM disaccharide
conjugates were prepared in which a lysine dipeptide was introduced
between the disaccharide and Cy5** dye moieties. Conjugate 4 (Scheme 2) incorporated d-lysyl-d-lysine, while conjugate 5 (Scheme S1) contained l-lysyl-l-lysine. As
anticipated, both of these conjugates were bound/internalized by DU145
cells more efficiently than BLM disaccharide–Cy5** (1) itself (Figure 6) and conjugate 4 was more effective than 5, no doubt reflecting the
greater susceptibility of the embedded l-lysyl-l-lysine moiety to proteolytic degradation.
Figure 6
(a) Effect of lysine
linkers on the internalization of BLM disaccharide–Cy5**
conjugates (4 and 5) on binding/uptake in
four cell lines. The cells were treated with 25 μM BLM disaccharide–Cy5**
analogues at 37 °C for 1 h, washed with PBS, and fixed with 4%
paraformaldehyde. Fluorescence imaging was carried out with a 2 s
exposure time. (b) Quantification of the binding/uptake of 25 μM
dye conjugates in different cancer cells and irradiated for 2 s prior
to imaging.
(a) Effect of lysine
linkers on the internalization of BLM disaccharide–Cy5**
conjugates (4 and 5) on binding/uptake in
four cell lines. The cells were treated with 25 μM BLM disaccharide–Cy5**
analogues at 37 °C for 1 h, washed with PBS, and fixed with 4%
paraformaldehyde. Fluorescence imaging was carried out with a 2 s
exposure time. (b) Quantification of the binding/uptake of 25 μM
dye conjugates in different cancer cells and irradiated for 2 s prior
to imaging.The foregoing experiments
were carried out using fixed cell imaging,
which was entirely sufficient to enable the conclusions enumerated
above. In order to address the issue of intracellular trafficking
of the internalized BLM (disaccharide)–Cy5** conjugates, initial
experiments were also carried out employing live cell imaging. These
were performed using cultured DU145 cells and BLM disaccharide conjugate 1; the images shown in Figure 7a were
taken after a 4 h incubation period. As is clear from the images,
the dye-labeled conjugate was associated primarily with the mitochondria
and with the nuclear envelope of the DU145 cells, two organelles of
potential interest for targeting in tumor cells.
Figure 7
(a) Uptake of BLM disaccharide–Cy5**
and (b) BLM disaccharide-d-Lys-d-Lys-Cy5** in DU145
cells was studied by live
cell imaging. The cells were grown as a monolayer culture for 48 h,
then treated with 25 μM BLM disaccharide–Cy5** (1) or BLM disaccharide-d-Lys-d-Lys-Cy5**
(4) for 0.5, 1.0, or 4.0 h. Prior to each time point,
the cells were treated with 100 nM mito-tracker green (mitochondrial
staining) and 2.5 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 (nuclear staining) for
20 min and then irradiated for 3.5 s prior to imaging. The results
after 4 h are shown. (c) Quantification of Cy5** in the mitochondria
is shown.
(a) Uptake of BLM disaccharide–Cy5**
and (b) BLM disaccharide-d-Lys-d-Lys-Cy5** in DU145
cells was studied by live
cell imaging. The cells were grown as a monolayer culture for 48 h,
then treated with 25 μM BLM disaccharide–Cy5** (1) or BLM disaccharide-d-Lys-d-Lys-Cy5**
(4) for 0.5, 1.0, or 4.0 h. Prior to each time point,
the cells were treated with 100 nM mito-tracker green (mitochondrial
staining) and 2.5 μg/mL Hoechst 33342 (nuclear staining) for
20 min and then irradiated for 3.5 s prior to imaging. The results
after 4 h are shown. (c) Quantification of Cy5** in the mitochondria
is shown.An additional experiment involving
live cell imaging was carried
out under the same conditions noted for Figure 7a, but using BLM disaccharide–Cy5** conjugate 4, containing an embedded d-lysyl-d-lysine peptide.
As is clear from Figure 7b and c, both the
amount and the distribution were altered relative to the observation
in Figure 7a, with a significant accumulation
of conjugate 4 within the mitochondria.
Discussion
In previous studies, novel conjugates of BLM disaccharides[25,27] and monosaccharides[26] have been used
to define the structural requirements for interaction of these BLMsugars selectively with tumor cells. It has been demonstrated that
the carbamoyl functional group is required for selective binding/uptake
of both the BLM mono- and disaccharides,[26,27] but that other BLM disaccharides in which the position or nature
of the carbamoyl moiety had been altered could actually afford 2–4-fold
more efficient targeting in some cases.[27] Interestingly, while the BLM monosaccharide was entirely sufficient
to support tumor cell targeting and uptake when employed in isolation,[26] two BLM congeners in which the l-gulose
moiety of the BLM disaccharide was replaced with glucose clearly did
not support tumor cell targeting/uptake,[28] establishing the importance of the molecular context in which the
carbamoylmannose moiety is presented to the cell.The discovery
of uncomplicated carbohydrate derivatives capable
of selectively targeting tumor cells,[25−27] and delivering molecular
cargoes to those cells,[25−28] in principle may enable novel strategies for the
delivery of potential therapeutic agents to cells in support of antitumor
therapy. The applicability of the strategy will necessarily be in
direct proportion to the generality of tumor-selective targeting,
arguing for the need to study a substantial variety of tumor cell
types, and to ensure that the targeting mechanisms are fundamentally
similar among these tumor cell types. Additionally, since not all
antitumor agents work by the same molecular mechanism, the intracellular
trafficking of the sugar–drug conjugates is of obvious importance.
The present study was designed to begin to address these issues, thereby
supporting efforts to select appropriate antitumor drugs for conjugation
and design carbohydrate–drug conjugates likely to exhibit selective
antitumor properties.In previous studies using BLM saccharide–dye
conjugates,
it was found that both the BLM mono- and disaccharide dye conjugates
selectively bound to a monolayer culture of a cancer cell line, but
not to a matched normal cell line, for five sets of cell lines.[25,26] In the present study, this observation of selective binding was
extended to C6 ratglioma cells, SW1088humanbrain cancer cells,
and SW480humancolon adenocarcinoma cancer cells, but not to any
of three matched normal cell lines (Figure 2). Also tested, albeit in the absence of matched normal control cells,
were BT474 humanbreast carcinoma cells and SW1783humanastrocytoma
cell lines, both of which exhibited significant binding/uptake of
BLM disaccharide–Cy5**. Thus, a total of 10 cancer cell lines
have now been documented as substrates for at least one BLM saccharide–dye
conjugate, and eight of these have been shown to lack comparable interactions
with a matched normal cell line.An important hallmark of BLMsaccharide–dye interaction
with cultured cancer cells is the need for a carbamoyl functional
group in an appropriate position of mannose.[26,27] This characteristic has been demonstrated for BLM mono- and disaccharide–Cy5**
conjugates using four cancer cell lines. In the present study, an
additional two cancer cell lines (C6 ratglioma cells and SW1783humanastrocytoma cells) were shown to share this property.In an
earlier study, it was found that a Cy5** conjugate containing
a trimeric cluster of 3-O-carbamoylmannose exhibited
enhanced binding/uptake to each of six different cancer cell lines,
relative to the binding observed for BLM monosaccharide–Cy5**.[26] The enhancements observed ranged from 1.6- to
2.3-fold, and were greatest for A549 cells and least pronounced for
DU145 cells. The apparent effect of multivalency in the interaction
suggested the possible involvement of a carbohydrate receptor, some
of which have been shown to exhibit multivalent effects.[33,34] The possible multivalent effects of the BLM disaccharide in its
interaction with cultured cancer cells has not been addressed to date
due to the greater complexity of the synthetic chemistry required
to elaborate a trimeric cluster of the BLM disaccharide. Nonetheless,
the successful synthesis of BLM disaccharide–Cy5** trimer (3) is outlined in Scheme 1, and enabled
this critical experiment to be carried out. As shown in Figure 4a,c, conjugate 3 was almost 3-fold
more efficient than BLM disaccharide–Cy5** (1)
in binding/uptake by DU145humanprostate carcinoma cells, which had
exhibited the least enhancement in the presence of BLM monosaccharide–Cy5**
trimer.[26] An experiment run in parallel
using PZ-HPV-7 human HPV-18 transformed prostate epithelium cells
verified the selectivity for the tumor cell line (Figure 4c).Preliminary evidence has now been provided
for the possible involvement
of one or more facilitative glucose transporters in the binding/uptake
of BLM by cancer cells.[28] Such transporters
are known to be up-regulated in cancer cells to support the greater
use of glycolysis for ATP production as compared with mitochondrial
oxidative phosphorylation.[35] The evidence
presented included the pretreatment of normal lung WI-38 cells and
normal kidney cells with a sublethal dose of the mitochondrial complex
I inhibitor rotenone[36] to induce the enhanced
use of glycolysis in these noncancer cell lines. In both cases, this
resulted in significantly enhanced uptake of BLM-Cy5**.[28] Further, when treated with the known GLUT1 inhibitors
cytochalasin B[37] and phloretin,[38] BLM-Cy5** binding/uptake by SW-480colon cancer
cells was reduced substantially, and in a dose-dependent fashion.[28]One of the most striking findings in the
current study involved
the metalloBLMs Cu(II)•BLM and Fe(III)•BLM, both of
which have been studied extensively over a period of years.[39,40] As shown in Figure 4b and c, Cu(II)•BLM-Cy5**
was bound/internalized about twice as efficiently as the metal-free
species (BLM–Cy5**) or the BLM disaccharide–Cy5** conjugate
(1). The observed binding was clearly dependent on the
BLM carbohydrate moiety, since Cu(II)•deglycoBLM–Cy5**
showed minimal binding/uptake (Figure 4b,c).
The observation was extended by testing both Cu(II)•BLM-Cy5**
and Fe(III)•BLM-Cy5** in four sets of cancer cell lines and
their matched normal control cell lines. As shown in Figure 5, the two metalloBLM–Cy5** conjugates exhibited
enhanced binding in all four cancer cells lines relative to metal
free BLM–Cy5**, and relative to the results obtained for Cu(II)•BLM–Cy5**
and Fe(III)•BLM–Cy5** in the normal cell lines. The
two metalloBLM–Cy5** conjugates gave comparable results in
three of the cancer cell lines studied, but not in SW1783humanastrocytoma
cells, for which Fe(III)•BLM–Cy5** proved to be the
more efficient ligand.The nature of the enhancement occasioned
by the presence of the
Cu2+ and Fe3+ cations was further defined by
studying the effects of the Zn(II) and Mn(III) chelates of BLM–Cy5**.
As shown in Figure 5, both of these cations,
which have been shown previously to form stable chelates with bleomycin,[31,32] also potentiated the selective binding of BLM–Cy5** to all
four cancer cells lines. The observation of enhanced binding/uptake
of positively charged species by mammalian cells is well documented,[41,42] and not entirely surprising given the negatively charged phospholipids
common to the external membranes of eukaryotic cells.[43,44] However, in the present case, each of the conjugates also contains
Cy5**, which has four negatively charged sulfonate functional groups
such that the metalloBLM–Cy5** conjugates likely retain a net
negative charge under the experimental conditions employed. Further,
both normal and cancer cells have phospholipids in their membranes,
but the selectivity for tumor cells is retained.The foregoing
findings for metalloBLMs may have important implications
for the mechanism of action of BLM as an antitumor agent. It has long
been recognized that DNA cleavage by bleomycin requires the presence
of a redox-active metal ion for oxygen activation. Fe(II)•BLM
is generally considered to be the metalloBLM species responsible for
oxygen activation in a therapeutic setting, although there is also
some evidence compatible with the possible participation of Cu(I)•BLM.[30] It has been posited that, following i.v. administration
as a metal-free species, bleomycin sequesters Cu2+ in the
serum, and this metal ion is later exchanged for Fe2+ intracellularly.[2] The cancer cell binding/uptake data presented
in Figures 4 and 5 suggests
that either of these metalloBLMs would gain access to tumor cells
much more readily than metal-free BLM, especially since the BLM family
antitumor agents employed clinically also have positively charged
C-termini and lack the negatively charged sulfonate groups present
in the conjugates studied here.One further conclusion evident
in the present data should also
be noted. The results shown in Figures 4 and 5 document that tumor cell binding and uptake are
facilitated by four different metal ions, each of which has been shown
to form a stable chelate with BLM, and three of which are redox-active
and can effect DNA cleavage.[15,16,30,32] The observed effects are clearly
different than those obtained in the absence of added metal ions,
arguing that each of the metal chelates must survive at least the
initial binding event (facilitated by the disaccharide) to the cancer
cell surface in order to produce the more efficient tumor cell binding
and uptake actually observed. Persistence of the metal complexes following
cell uptake might well alter the cellular distribution of the internalized
bleomycins as well, potentially leading to enhanced association with
the cell mitochondria (cf., Figure 7a,b).In order to realize the enhanced efficiency of tumor cell binding/uptake
occasioned by the presence of a chelated metal cation, it would be
useful from the perspective of medicinal chemistry to be able to achieve
the same effect using a positively charged organic functional group.
Accordingly, two conjugates (4 and 5) were
prepared in which d or l-lysyl-lysine was embedded
between the BLM disaccharide and Cy5** reporter group. As shown in
Figure 6, both of these positively charged
functionalities enhanced binding/uptake to cultured DU145 cells. As
in the case of BLM, the conjugated Cy5** contained four negatively
charged groups, such that enhanced uptake was achieved with a molecule
lacking a net positive charge.If the BLM saccharides are employed
to deliver conjugated cytotoxins
or other agents selectively to tumor cells, the ability to realize
effective therapeutic intervention will also depend on the ability
of the delivered agent to gain access to the relevant subcellular
compartment(s). At present no information is available concerning
the trafficking of BLM or its carbohydrates following internalization.
As shown in Figure 7a, which involved the live
cell imaging of cultured DU145 cells 4 h after treatment with BLMdisaccharide 1, the conjugate was substantially associated
both with the nuclear membrane and with the mitochondria. In comparison,
conjugate 4 was more substantially associated with the
cell mitochondria. Association of the conjugate (having an embedded d-Lys-d-Lysdipeptide) with the nuclear membrane is
unsurprising, and completely consistent with the putative mechanism
of action of bleomycin, involving degradation of chromatin. The mitochondrial
association may also reflect the presence of the embedded positively
charged dipeptide, as such species are known to accumulate in mitochondria
due to the high membrane potential associated with the inner mitochondrial
membrane.[45−48] It may also be noted that damage to mitochondrial DNA is repaired
primarily by base excision repair, such that the repair of BLM-mediated
damage to mitochondrial DNA may be less facile than chromatin repair.
In fact, it has been reported that mitochondrial DNA is more sensitive
to BLM than nuclear DNA,[49] that mitochondrial
DNA repair occurs only in part following BLM treatment,[50] and that BLM-induced apoptosis requires the
presence of DNA within the mitochondria.[51]
Conclusions
The binding of the disaccharide moiety of bleomycin
has now been
demonstrated for a total of 10 cultured cancer cell lines using a
conjugate of the disaccharide and cyanine dye Cy5**. This reinforces
the observations made initially using microbubbles containing conjugated
BLM or BLM disaccharide. Unexpectedly, chelation of BLM–Cy5**
to any of four different metal ions resulted in significantly enhanced
cellular uptake, and this still proved to be selective for cancer
cells. That the enhanced uptake resulted from the positive charge
associated with the metal ions in the formed metalloBLMs was supported
by the observation that a disaccharide–Cy5** conjugate containing
an embedded bis-lysine moiety also exhibited enhanced uptake. For
the BLM disaccharide conjugate containing bis-lysine, live cell imaging
revealed that the intracellular distribution of the conjugate was
also altered, favoring accumulation in the cell mitochondria. This
is consistent with the potential across the inner mitochondrial membrane.[45−48] To the extent that metalloBLMs retain their chelated metal ion following
cancer cell uptake, it would also be logical to expect that they might
also exhibit a similar change in intracellular distribution.
Authors: Riya Khetan; Cintya Dharmayanti; Todd A Gillam; Eric Kübler; Manuela Klingler-Hoffmann; Carmela Ricciardelli; Martin K Oehler; Anton Blencowe; Sanjay Garg; Hugo Albrecht Journal: Cancers (Basel) Date: 2022-05-10 Impact factor: 6.575
Authors: Xifeng Liu; A Lee Miller; Brian E Waletzki; Tewodros K Mamo; Michael J Yaszemski; Lichun Lu Journal: New J Chem Date: 2015-09-03 Impact factor: 3.591