Literature DB >> 25904710

Motor control hierarchy in joint action that involves bimanual force production.

Junya Masumoto1, Nobuyuki Inui2.   

Abstract

The concept of hierarchical motor control has been viewed as a means of progressively decreasing the number of variables manipulated by each higher control level. We tested the hypothesis that turning an individual bimanual force-production task into a joint (two-participant) force-production task would lead to positive correlation between forces produced by the two hands of the individual participant (symmetric strategy) to enable negative correlation between forces produced by two participants (complementary strategy). The present study consisted of individual and joint tasks that involved both unimanual and bimanual conditions. In the joint task, 10 pairs of participants produced periodic isometric forces, such that the sum of forces that they produced matched a target force cycling between 5% and 10% of maximum voluntary contraction at 1 Hz. In the individual task, individuals attempted to match the same target force. In the joint bimanual condition, the two hands of each participant adopted a symmetric strategy of force, whereas the two participants adopted a complementary strategy of force, highlighting that the bimanual action behaved as a low level of a hierarchy, whereas the joint action behaved as an upper level. The complementary force production was greater interpersonally than intrapersonally. However, whereas the coherence was highest at 1 Hz in all conditions, the frequency synchrony was stronger intrapersonally than interpersonally. Moreover, whereas the bimanual action exhibited a smaller error and variability of force than the unimanual action, the joint action exhibited a less-variable interval and force than the individual action.
Copyright © 2015 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bimanual action; complementary force production; hierarchy; joint action; synchronization

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25904710      PMCID: PMC4468970          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00313.2015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  28 in total

1.  The uncontrolled manifold concept: identifying control variables for a functional task.

Authors:  J P Scholz; G Schöner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Callosotomy patients exhibit temporal uncoupling during continuous bimanual movements.

Authors:  Steven W Kennerley; Jörn Diedrichsen; Eliot Hazeltine; Andras Semjen; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Learning multi-finger synergies: an uncontrolled manifold analysis.

Authors:  Ning Kang; Minoru Shinohara; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 4.  Coordination.

Authors:  M T Turvey
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1990-08

5.  Joint action: bodies and minds moving together.

Authors:  Natalie Sebanz; Harold Bekkering; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2006-01-10       Impact factor: 20.229

6.  Motor-unit activity responsible for 8- to 12-Hz component of human physiological finger tremor.

Authors:  R J Elble; J E Randall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory.

Authors:  R C Oldfield
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  1971-03       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  On the coordination of two-handed movements.

Authors:  J A Kelso; D L Southard; D Goodman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Disrupted timing of discontinuous but not continuous movements by cerebellar lesions.

Authors:  Rebecca M C Spencer; Howard N Zelaznik; Jörn Diedrichsen; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Science       Date:  2003-05-30       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  The role of the corpus callosum in the coupling of bimanual isometric force pulses.

Authors:  Jörn Diedrichsen; Eliot Hazeltine; Wesley K Nurss; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  8 in total

1.  Force asymmetry deteriorates complementary force production during joint action.

Authors:  Junya Masumoto; Nobuyuki Inui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-05-11       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Bidirectional transfer between joint and individual actions in a task of discrete force production.

Authors:  Junya Masumoto; Nobuyuki Inui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-04-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interpersonal synergies: static prehension tasks performed by two actors.

Authors:  Stanislaw Solnik; Sasha Reschechtko; Yen-Hsun Wu; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  How does a partner's motor variability affect joint action?

Authors:  Simily Sabu; Arianna Curioni; Cordula Vesper; Natalie Sebanz; Günther Knoblich
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Performance similarities predict collective benefits in dyadic and triadic joint visual search.

Authors:  Basil Wahn; Artur Czeszumski; Peter König
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  On the Role of Physical Interaction on Performance of Object Manipulation by Dyads.

Authors:  Keivan Mojtahedi; Qiushi Fu; Marco Santello
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2017-11-07       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Haptic communication optimises joint decisions and affords implicit confidence sharing.

Authors:  Giovanni Pezzulo; Lucas Roche; Ludovic Saint-Bauzel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Let's Move It Together: A Review of Group Benefits in Joint Object Control.

Authors:  Basil Wahn; April Karlinsky; Laura Schmitz; Peter König
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.