Literature DB >> 25904358

Evaluating the Impact of Performance Improvement Initiatives on Transplant Center Reporting Compliance and Patient Follow-Up After Living Kidney Donation.

N Keshvani1, I D Feurer2,3,4, E Rumbaugh4, A Dreher4, E Zavala2,4, M Stanley4, H M Schaefer1,4.   

Abstract

With the changing demographics of the living donor population and increased regulatory oversight, it is important that transplant centers report outcomes accurately. The aim of our retrospective cohort study of 312 living donors who underwent nephrectomy between 2008 and 2013 was to evaluate the impact of living donor program performance improvement initiatives on: (i) transplant center program reporting compliance; (ii) patient compliance with postdonation follow-up and its associated factors; and (iii) overall financial costs to the transplant center. The effect of the initiatives (donation eras 2008-2010 and 2011-2013) on compliance at key reporting points (6 months, 1 year, 2 years) was analyzed using correlation coefficients, χ(2) and Fisher's exact tests. Multivariable logistic regression models tested the initiatives' effect on the likelihood of patient follow-up. The initiatives were associated with significant improvement in form reporting compliance (r ≥ 0.862, p ≤ 0.027; 1 and 2 year Fisher's Exact p ≤ 0.002) and patient follow-up (χ(2) p ≤ 0.009) with acceptable transplant center costs. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that donation era was consistently and significantly (p < 0.001) associated with increased likelihood of postdonation patient follow-up. Institution of performance improvement initiatives with dedicated program resources is financially feasible and leads to more accurate and complete form reporting and improved patient follow-up after nephrectomy. © Copyright 2015 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical research/practice; donors and donation: donor follow-up; guidelines; kidney transplantation/nephrology

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25904358     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13265

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  5 in total

1.  KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline on the Evaluation and Care of Living Kidney Donors.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Bertram L Kasiske; Andrew S Levey; Patricia L Adams; Josefina Alberú; Mohamed A Bakr; Lorenzo Gallon; Catherine A Garvey; Sandeep Guleria; Philip Kam-Tao Li; Dorry L Segev; Sandra J Taler; Kazunari Tanabe; Linda Wright; Martin G Zeier; Michael Cheung; Amit X Garg
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Living kidney donation in a developing country.

Authors:  Chandni Dayal; Malcolm Davies; Nina Elisabeth Diana; Anthony Meyers
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  The National Landscape of Living Kidney Donor Follow-Up in the United States.

Authors:  M L Henderson; A G Thomas; A Shaffer; A B Massie; X Luo; C M Holscher; T S Purnell; K L Lentine; D L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Billing for living kidney donor care: Balancing cost recovery, regulatory compliance, and minimized donor burden.

Authors:  Andrea Tietjen; Rebecca Hays; Gwen McNatt; Robert Howey; Ursula Lebron-Banks; Christie P Thomas; Krista L Lentine
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2019-04-27

Review 5.  Managing the Costs of Routine Follow-up Care After Living Kidney Donation: a Review and Survey of Contemporary Experience, Practices, and Challenges.

Authors:  Krista L Lentine; Nagaraju Sarabu; Gwen McNatt; Robert Howey; Rebecca Hays; Christie P Thomas; Ursula Lebron-Banks; Linda Ohler; Cody Wooley; Addie Wisniewski; Huiling Xiao; Andrea Tietjen
Journal:  Curr Transplant Rep       Date:  2022-09-22
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.