Literature DB >> 25904321

Bateman's principle is reversed in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Kathleen Apakupakul1, Dustin R Rubenstein2.   

Abstract

Bateman's principle is not only used to explain sex differences in mating behaviour, but also to determine which sex has the greater opportunity for sexual selection. It predicts that the relationship between the number of mates and the number of offspring produced should be stronger for males than for females. Yet, it is unclear whether Bateman's principle holds in cooperatively breeding systems where the strength of selection on traits used in intrasexual competition is high in both sexes. We tested Bateman's principle in the cooperatively breeding superb starling (Lamprotornis superbus), finding that only females showed a significant, positive Bateman gradient. We also found that the opportunity for selection was on average higher in females, but that its strength and direction oscillated through time. These data are consistent with the hypothesis that sexual selection underlies the female trait elaboration observed in superb starlings and other cooperative breeders. Even though the Bateman gradient was steeper for females than for males, the year-to-year oscillation in the strength and direction of the opportunity for selection likely explains why cooperative breeders do not exhibit sexual role reversal. Thus, Bateman's principle may not hold in cooperative breeders where both sexes appear to be under mutually strong sexual selection.
© 2015 The Author(s) Published by the Royal Society. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bateman gradient; Bateman's principle; cooperative breeding; sexual selection

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25904321      PMCID: PMC4424618          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2015.0034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  11 in total

1.  No evidence of sexual selection in a repetition of Bateman's classic study of Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Patricia Adair Gowaty; Yong-Kyu Kim; Wyatt W Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 2.  Sexual selection is a form of social selection.

Authors:  Bruce E Lyon; Robert Montgomerie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-08-19       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Female extrapair mate choice in a cooperative breeder: trading sex for help and increasing offspring heterozygosity.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Promiscuity drives sexual selection in a socially monogamous bird.

Authors:  Michael S Webster; Keith A Tarvin; Elaina M Tuttle; Stephen Pruett-Jones
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2007-08-23       Impact factor: 3.694

5.  Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila.

Authors:  A J BATEMAN
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  1948-12       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Reproductive skew and selection on female ornamentation in social species.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein; Irby J Lovette
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Bateman's Principle in Cooperatively Breeding Vertebrates: The Effects of Non-breeding Alloparents on Variability in Female and Male Reproductive Success.

Authors:  Mark E Hauber; Eileen A Lacey
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.326

8.  Response to comments on "Bateman in nature: predation on offspring reduces the potential for sexual selection".

Authors:  John Byers; Stacey Dunn
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-05-03       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Temporal but not spatial environmental variation drives adaptive offspring sex allocation in a plural cooperative breeder.

Authors:  Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  2007-05-11       Impact factor: 3.926

10.  Intra-sexual selection in cooperative mammals and birds: why are females not bigger and better armed?

Authors:  Andrew J Young; Nigel C Bennett
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-10-28       Impact factor: 6.237

View more
  3 in total

1.  Reproductive skew drives patterns of sexual dimorphism in sponge-dwelling snapping shrimps.

Authors:  Solomon Tin Chi Chak; J Emmett Duffy; Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  The fitness consequences of kin-biased dispersal in a cooperatively breeding bird.

Authors:  Lea Pollack; Dustin R Rubenstein
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 3.703

3.  Degree of anisogamy is unrelated to the intensity of sexual selection.

Authors:  Judit Mokos; István Scheuring; András Liker; Robert P Freckleton; Tamás Székely
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 4.379

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.