Literature DB >> 25904248

The Impact of Hydroxyethyl Starch Use in Deceased Organ Donors on the Development of Delayed Graft Function in Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Propensity-Adjusted Analysis.

M S Patel1, C U Niemann2,3, M B Sally4,5, S De La Cruz4,5, J Zatarain6, T Ewing7, M Crutchfield4, C K Enestvedt5, D J Malinoski4,5.   

Abstract

Our objective was to evaluate the impact of hydroxyethyl starch (HES) use in organ donors after neurologic determination of death (DNDD) on recipient renal graft outcomes. The following data elements were prospectively collected for every DNDD managed by a single organ procurement organization from June 2011 to July 2013: demographics; critical care endpoints; treatments, including the use of HES; graft cold ischemia time (CIT); and the occurrence of recipient delayed graft function (DGF, dialysis in the first week after transplantation). Logistic regression was performed to identify independent predictors of DGF with a p-value <0.05. The results were then adjusted for each donor's calculated propensity to receive HES. Nine hundred eighty-six kidneys were transplanted from 529 donors. Forty-two percent received HES (1217 ± 528 mL) and 35% developed DGF. Kidneys from DNDDs who received HES had a higher crude rate of DGF (41% vs. 31%, p < 0.001). After accounting for the propensity to receive HES, independent predictors of DGF were age (OR 1.02 [1.01-1.04] per year), CIT (OR 1.04[1.02-1.06] per hour), creatinine (OR 1.5 [1.32-1.72] per mg/dL) and HES use (OR 1.41 [1.02-1.95]). HES use during donor management was independently associated with a 41% increase in the risk of DGF in kidney transplant recipients. © Copyright 2015 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.

Entities:  

Keywords:  donors and donation; donors and donation: donation after brain death (DBD)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25904248     DOI: 10.1111/ajt.13263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Transplant        ISSN: 1600-6135            Impact factor:   8.086


  5 in total

Review 1.  Organ-Protective Intensive Care in Organ Donors.

Authors:  Klaus Hahnenkamp; Klaus Böhler; Heiner Wolters; Karsten Wiebe; Dietmar Schneider; Hartmut H-J Schmidt
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2016-08-22       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  Deceased organ donor factors influencing pancreatic graft transplantation and survival.

Authors:  Mitchell B Sally; Margaret Katherine Ellis; Michael Hutchens; Tahnee Groat; Elizabeth Swanson; Madhukar S Patel; Claus U Niemann; Darren J Malinoski
Journal:  Clin Transplant       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.863

Review 3.  Management of the brain-dead donor in the ICU: general and specific therapy to improve transplantable organ quality.

Authors:  Geert Meyfroidt; Jan Gunst; Ignacio Martin-Loeches; Martin Smith; Chiara Robba; Fabio Silvio Taccone; Giuseppe Citerio
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 4.  The development and current status of Intensive Care Unit management of prospective organ donors.

Authors:  Margaret Kathleen Menzel Ellis; Mitchell Brett Sally; Darren Malinoski
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2016 Jul-Sep

Review 5.  Diagnostic and therapeutic approach to infectious diseases in solid organ transplant recipients.

Authors:  Jean-François Timsit; Romain Sonneville; Andre C Kalil; Matteo Bassetti; Ricard Ferrer; Samir Jaber; Fanny Lanternier; Charles-Edouard Luyt; Flavia Machado; Malgorzata Mikulska; Laurent Papazian; Fréderic Pène; Garyphalia Poulakou; Claudio Viscoli; Michel Wolff; Lara Zafrani; Christian Van Delden
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2019-03-25       Impact factor: 17.440

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.