Literature DB >> 25903690

Impact of surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus on tumour stage and survival of patients with neoplastic progression.

F Kastelein1, S H van Olphen2, E W Steyerberg3, M C W Spaander1, M J Bruno1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Endoscopic surveillance for Barrett's oesophagus (BO) is under discussion given the overall low incidence of neoplastic progression and lack of evidence that it prevents advanced oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of endoscopic BO surveillance on tumour stage and survival of patients with neoplastic progression.
DESIGN: 783 patients with BO of at least 2 cm were included in a multicentre prospective cohort and followed during surveillance according to the American College of Gastroenterology guidelines. Cases of high-grade dysplasia and OAC were identified during follow-up. OAC staging was performed according to the 7th UICC-AJCC classification. Survival data were collected and crosschecked using death and municipal registries. Data from patients with OAC in the general population were obtained from the Dutch cancer registry. We compared survival of patients with BO with neoplastic progression during surveillance with those of patients without neoplastic progression and patients with OAC in the general population.
RESULTS: 53 patients with BO developed high-grade dysplasia or OAC during surveillance. Thirty-five (66%) were classified as stage 0, 14 (26%) as stage 1 and 4 (8%) as stage 2. OAC was diagnosed at an earlier stage during BO surveillance than in the general population (p<0.001). Survival of patients with BO with neoplastic progression was not significantly worse than those of patients without neoplastic progression and similar to survival of patients with stage 0 or stage 1 OAC in the general population.
CONCLUSIONS: OAC is detected at an earlier stage during BO surveillance than in the general population with good survival rates. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/

Entities:  

Keywords:  BARRETT'S CARCINOMA; BARRETT'S METAPLASIA; BARRETT'S OESOPHAGUS; OESOPHAGEAL CANCER; SURVEILLANCE

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25903690     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308802

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  17 in total

1.  The Annual Risk of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Does Not Decrease Over Time in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Theresa Nguyen; Aaron P Thrift; Xiaoying Yu; Zhigang Duan; Hashem B El-Serag
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 2.  [Barrett's esophagus].

Authors:  J Labenz
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 0.743

3.  Low risk of adenocarcinoma and high-grade dysplasia in patients with non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus: Results from a cohort from a country with low esophageal adenocarcinoma incidence.

Authors:  António Dias Pereira; Paula Chaves
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.623

4.  p53 protein accumulation predicts malignant progression in Barrett's metaplasia: a prospective study of 275 patients.

Authors:  Mamoun Younes; Keith Brown; Gregory Y Lauwers; Gulchin Ergun; Frank Meriano; A Carl Schmulen; Alberto Barroso; Atilla Ertan
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  2017-04-11       Impact factor: 5.087

Review 5.  Endoscopic surveillance or ablation for Barrett's esophagus?

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Nina Saxena
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-12-06

6.  Rates and predictors of progression to esophageal carcinoma in a large population-based Barrett's esophagus cohort.

Authors:  Rajesh Krishnamoorthi; Bijan Borah; Herbert Heien; Ananya Das; Amitabh Chak; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 7.  The Effect of Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Don Chamil Codipilly; Apoorva Krishna Chandar; Siddharth Singh; Sachin Wani; Nicholas J Shaheen; John M Inadomi; Amitabh Chak; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 8.  Best Practices in Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Joseph R Triggs; Gary W Falk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2020-10-21

9.  The Impact of the Policy-Practice Gap on Costs and Benefits of Barrett's Esophagus Management.

Authors:  Amir-Houshang Omidvari; Carlijn A M Roumans; Steffie K Naber; Sonja Kroep; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Ate van der Gaast; Pieter-Jan de Jonge; Manon C W Spaander; Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 10.  Prevention Strategies for Esophageal Cancer-An Expert Review.

Authors:  Elisa Marabotto; Gaia Pellegatta; Afscin Djahandideh Sheijani; Sebastiano Ziola; Patrizia Zentilin; Maria Giulia De Marzo; Edoardo Giovanni Giannini; Matteo Ghisa; Brigida Barberio; Marco Scarpa; Imerio Angriman; Matteo Fassan; Vincenzo Savarino; Edoardo Savarino
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-01       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.