Literature DB >> 25903493

Livestock keepers' reasons for doing and not doing things which governments, vets and scientists would like them to do.

C Garforth1.   

Abstract

Farmers are rational. They do what makes sense to them in the particular circumstances of their farm, family and business. The challenge for those who want to influence farmers' behaviour - policy makers, veterinarians, public health professionals - is to understand their rationality, to gain some insight into how they see the world and the various options it offers to them. This study explores some of the reasons that emerge from recent research on why their decisions are not always the ones that other people expect or want them to take. These include differences in values, motivations, social influences and behavioural types. Also relevant is how farmers view the sources from which advice and information are seen to come: some advice is rejected simply because a farmer does not see the person or organization as a trustworthy source. It is now widely accepted that farmers' motivations for continuing what they are doing, and for changing what they are doing, are not simply economic or financial. Their decisions cannot be predicted on the basis of simplistic notions of 'economic rationality'. While costs and returns are clearly important in weighing up choices (and farm management economics has given us several useful tools and methodologies for analysing these), farmers operate within a social context that both constrains and facilitates their behavioural choices. They have complex sets of core values, just like anyone else, which will make some choices more attractive than others that are potentially more rewarding financially. It is therefore appropriate to look to the wider family of social sciences beyond economics, including sociology, psychology and social psychology, to help us understand more fully the factors that inform and influence farm-level decisions. And this improved understanding should make us better at designing policy and advisory interventions that will benefit farmers and society.
© 2015 Blackwell Verlag GmbH.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Attitudes; farmer behaviour; livestock health; policy; social science

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25903493     DOI: 10.1111/zph.12189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  17 in total

Review 1.  Addressing Antimicrobial Resistance: An Overview of Priority Actions to Prevent Suboptimal Antimicrobial Use in Food-Animal Production.

Authors:  Guillaume Lhermie; Yrjö T Gröhn; Didier Raboisson
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 2.  Decision making on helminths in cattle: diagnostics, economics and human behaviour.

Authors:  Johannes Charlier; Valérie De Waele; Els Ducheyne; Mariska van der Voort; Fiona Vande Velde; Edwin Claerebout
Journal:  Ir Vet J       Date:  2016-09-27       Impact factor: 2.146

3.  Mastitis on Rabbit Farms: Prevalence and Risk Factors.

Authors:  Joan M Rosell; L Fernando de la Fuente
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 4.  Modeling Dynamic Human Behavioral Changes in Animal Disease Models: Challenges and Opportunities for Addressing Bias.

Authors:  Arata Hidano; Gareth Enticott; Robert M Christley; M Carolyn Gates
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-06-21

5.  Learning Processes and Trajectories for the Reduction of Antibiotic Use in Pig Farming: A Qualitative Approach.

Authors:  Nicolas Fortané; Florence Bonnet-Beaugrand; Anne Hémonic; Carole Samedi; Arnaud Savy; Catherine Belloc
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-22

6.  Whole-flock, metaphylactic tilmicosin failed to eliminate contagious ovine digital dermatitis and footrot in sheep: a cluster randomised trial.

Authors:  J W Angell; D H Grove-White; H J Williams; J S Duncan
Journal:  Vet Rec       Date:  2016-07-22       Impact factor: 2.695

7.  The effect of sub-clinical infection with Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis on milk production in a New Zealand dairy herd.

Authors:  Andrew Bates; Rory O'Brien; Simon Liggett; Frank Griffin
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2018-03-14       Impact factor: 2.741

8.  The importance of communication in promoting voluntary participation in an experimental trial: A qualitative study based on the assessment of the gamma-interferon test for the diagnosis of bovine tuberculosis in France.

Authors:  Clémence Boireau; Barbara Dufour; Anne Praud
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Farmer Behavior and Gastrointestinal Nematodes in Ruminant Livestock-Uptake of Sustainable Control Approaches.

Authors:  Fiona Vande Velde; Johannes Charlier; Edwin Claerebout
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2018-10-16

Review 10.  Addressing Individual Values to Impact Prudent Antimicrobial Prescribing in Animal Agriculture.

Authors:  Laurel E Redding; Cecilia Brooks; Christine B Georgakakos; Greg Habing; Leah Rosenkrantz; Michael Dahlstrom; Paul J Plummer
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2020-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.