Jawid Madjidyar1, Julian Hermes, Sandra Freitag-Wolf, Olav Jansen. 1. Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, House 41, 24105, Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany, jawid.madjidyar@uksh.de.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Different devices and techniques are available for endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. In this in vitro study, we examined the stent-thrombus interaction and the influence of additional aspiration on the efficiency of mechanical thrombectomy with established stent retrievers. METHODS: Human blood thrombi were made in a Chandler loop. The thrombi were placed into the middle cerebral artery of a vascular silicon phantom. A programmable piston pump was used to acquire physiological flow in the model. Resistances were interposed to gain physiological pressure. The stent retrievers Trevo, Solitaire FR, Separator 3D, and Aperio were used to perform thrombectomy under direct visual control. For the additional aspiration, we used intermediate catheters. RESULTS: Ten attempts per device were made with and without aspiration under standardized conditions, a total of n = 80. For all thrombectomy maneuvers, it was demonstrated that the thrombus was pushed by the stent struts against the vessel wall and was retracted along it. The stent-thrombus interaction was only superficial for all devices. Using additional distal aspiration, the amount of distal embolism and rate of embolism in new territories was significantly lower than without. Moreover, additional aspiration reduced the number of recanalization maneuvers and the recanalization time. CONCLUSION: Distal aspiration with intermediate catheters increases the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy with stent retrievers significantly. In contrary to earlier suggestions, the interaction between the thrombus and the stent retriever is only superficial, rather than an integration of the thrombus into the retriever. No significant differences between the proven devices could be shown in our model.
INTRODUCTION: Different devices and techniques are available for endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke. In this in vitro study, we examined the stent-thrombus interaction and the influence of additional aspiration on the efficiency of mechanical thrombectomy with established stent retrievers. METHODS:Humanblood thrombi were made in a Chandler loop. The thrombi were placed into the middle cerebral artery of a vascular silicon phantom. A programmable piston pump was used to acquire physiological flow in the model. Resistances were interposed to gain physiological pressure. The stent retrievers Trevo, Solitaire FR, Separator 3D, and Aperio were used to perform thrombectomy under direct visual control. For the additional aspiration, we used intermediate catheters. RESULTS: Ten attempts per device were made with and without aspiration under standardized conditions, a total of n = 80. For all thrombectomy maneuvers, it was demonstrated that the thrombus was pushed by the stent struts against the vessel wall and was retracted along it. The stent-thrombus interaction was only superficial for all devices. Using additional distal aspiration, the amount of distal embolism and rate of embolism in new territories was significantly lower than without. Moreover, additional aspiration reduced the number of recanalization maneuvers and the recanalization time. CONCLUSION: Distal aspiration with intermediate catheters increases the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy with stent retrievers significantly. In contrary to earlier suggestions, the interaction between the thrombus and the stent retriever is only superficial, rather than an integration of the thrombus into the retriever. No significant differences between the proven devices could be shown in our model.
Authors: Victor J Marder; Dennis J Chute; Sidney Starkman; Anna M Abolian; Chelsea Kidwell; David Liebeskind; Bruce Ovbiagele; Fernando Vinuela; Gary Duckwiler; Reza Jahan; Paul M Vespa; Scott Selco; Venkatakrishna Rajajee; Doojin Kim; Nerses Sanossian; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-06-22 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Jeffrey L Saver; Reza Jahan; Elad I Levy; Tudor G Jovin; Blaise Baxter; Raul G Nogueira; Wayne Clark; Ronald Budzik; Osama O Zaidat Journal: Lancet Date: 2012-08-26 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: David S Liebeskind; Nerses Sanossian; William H Yong; Sidney Starkman; Michael P Tsang; Antonio L Moya; David D Zheng; Anna M Abolian; Doojin Kim; Latisha K Ali; Samir H Shah; Amytis Towfighi; Bruce Ovbiagele; Chelsea S Kidwell; Satoshi Tateshima; Reza Jahan; Gary R Duckwiler; Fernando Viñuela; Noriko Salamon; J Pablo Villablanca; Harry V Vinters; Victor J Marder; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: Stroke Date: 2011-03-10 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Chelsea S Kidwell; Reza Jahan; Jeffrey Gornbein; Jeffry R Alger; Val Nenov; Zahra Ajani; Lei Feng; Brett C Meyer; Scott Olson; Lee H Schwamm; Albert J Yoo; Randolph S Marshall; Philip M Meyers; Dileep R Yavagal; Max Wintermark; Judy Guzy; Sidney Starkman; Jeffrey L Saver Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-02-08 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Joseph P Broderick; Yuko Y Palesch; Andrew M Demchuk; Sharon D Yeatts; Pooja Khatri; Michael D Hill; Edward C Jauch; Tudor G Jovin; Bernard Yan; Frank L Silver; Rüdiger von Kummer; Carlos A Molina; Bart M Demaerschalk; Ronald Budzik; Wayne M Clark; Osama O Zaidat; Tim W Malisch; Mayank Goyal; Wouter J Schonewille; Mikael Mazighi; Stefan T Engelter; Craig Anderson; Judith Spilker; Janice Carrozzella; Karla J Ryckborst; L Scott Janis; Renée H Martin; Lydia D Foster; Thomas A Tomsick Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2013-02-07 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: S Soize; L Pierot; M Mirza; G Gunning; M Gilvarry; M Gawlitza; D Vivien; M Zuber; E Touzé Journal: AJNR Am J Neuroradiol Date: 2020-05-14 Impact factor: 3.825
Authors: Johannes C Gerber; Dirk Daubner; Daniel Kaiser; Kay Engellandt; Kevin Haedrich; Angela Mueller; Volker Puetz; Jennifer Linn; Andrij Abramyuk Journal: Neuroradiology Date: 2017-03-01 Impact factor: 2.804
Authors: Yang Liu; Mehdi Abbasi; Jorge L Arturo Larco; Ramanathan Kadirvel; David F Kallmes; Waleed Brinjikji; Luis Savastano Journal: J Neurointerv Surg Date: 2021-03-15 Impact factor: 8.572
Authors: Aurélien Freiherr von Seckendorff; François Delvoye; Paul Levant; Mialitiana Solo Nomenjanahary; Véronique Ollivier; Marie-Charlotte Bourrienne; Lucas Di Meglio; Michel Piotin; Simon Escalard; Benjamin Maier; Solène Hebert; Stanislas Smajda; Hocine Redjem; Mikael Mazighi; Raphael Blanc; Benoit Ho-Tin-Noé; Jean-Philippe Désilles Journal: Front Neurol Date: 2022-01-27 Impact factor: 4.003