Eduardo Borsini1,2, Glenda Ernst3, Alejandro Salvado3, Martín Bosio3, Julio Chertcoff3, Facundo Nogueira4, Carlos Nigro5. 1. Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. borsinieduardo@yahoo.com.ar. 2. , Sth n°:74, Perdriel, Buenos Aires, AEB1280, Argentina. borsinieduardo@yahoo.com.ar. 3. Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 4. Hospital de Clínicas, Buenos Aires, Argentina. 5. Hospital Alemán, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Utility of questionnaires to estimate the probability of obstructive sleep apneas (OSA) is varying, and it is challenging to know the performance of STOP (Snore, Tired, Observed apnea, and Pressure)-BANG (BMI, Age, Neck and Gender) with simplified methods. To assess the performance of STOP-BANG and its ability to predict sleep apnea in patients with high pre-test like-hood to present OSA referred for a home respiratory polygraphy (RP) were studied. METHOD: A cross-sectional study of patients recruited over 26 months was performed. They were asked to complete the STOP-BANG questionnaire during evaluation prior to RP and were evaluated according to different apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) cut-offs. Areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and multiple logistic regression models were calculated. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty-nine patients were studied; 557 were male (64.1 %) with a median age of 52.82 ± 14.43 years, a body mass index (BMI) of 32.88 ± 8.51, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score of 7.95 ± 5.17. The performance for AHI ≥5/h (ROC area) was: STOP 0.62, BANG 0.66, and STOP-BANG 0.69. The best sensitivity (S)-specificity (Sp) relationship for AHI ≥5/h was found with 5 components in any combination (S 56.02 %; Sp 70 %). For AHI ≥30/h, STOP was 0.68, BANG 0.66 and STOP-BANG 0.73 and the best S-Sp relationship was obtained with 5 components (S 68 %; Sp 63.6 %). Six variables (snoring, observed apneas, high blood pressure (HBP), BMI >35, neck perimeter >40 cm, and male gender) showed the best performance for AHI >30/h; ROC area 0.76. CONCLUSION: STOP-BANG shows different discrimination power for AHI >5 and ≥30/h using RP. Five components in any combination have acceptable diagnostic S to identify patients with severe OSA. STOP-BANG performed best to identify AHI ≥30/h.
BACKGROUND: Utility of questionnaires to estimate the probability of obstructive sleep apneas (OSA) is varying, and it is challenging to know the performance of STOP (Snore, Tired, Observed apnea, and Pressure)-BANG (BMI, Age, Neck and Gender) with simplified methods. To assess the performance of STOP-BANG and its ability to predict sleep apnea in patients with high pre-test like-hood to present OSA referred for a home respiratory polygraphy (RP) were studied. METHOD: A cross-sectional study of patients recruited over 26 months was performed. They were asked to complete the STOP-BANG questionnaire during evaluation prior to RP and were evaluated according to different apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) cut-offs. Areas under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and multiple logistic regression models were calculated. RESULTS: Eight hundred sixty-nine patients were studied; 557 were male (64.1 %) with a median age of 52.82 ± 14.43 years, a body mass index (BMI) of 32.88 ± 8.51, and Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score of 7.95 ± 5.17. The performance for AHI ≥5/h (ROC area) was: STOP 0.62, BANG 0.66, and STOP-BANG 0.69. The best sensitivity (S)-specificity (Sp) relationship for AHI ≥5/h was found with 5 components in any combination (S 56.02 %; Sp 70 %). For AHI ≥30/h, STOP was 0.68, BANG 0.66 and STOP-BANG 0.73 and the best S-Sp relationship was obtained with 5 components (S 68 %; Sp 63.6 %). Six variables (snoring, observed apneas, high blood pressure (HBP), BMI >35, neck perimeter >40 cm, and male gender) showed the best performance for AHI >30/h; ROC area 0.76. CONCLUSION: STOP-BANG shows different discrimination power for AHI >5 and ≥30/h using RP. Five components in any combination have acceptable diagnostic S to identify patients with severe OSA. STOP-BANG performed best to identify AHI ≥30/h.
Authors: Robert P Skomro; John Gjevre; John Reid; Brian McNab; Sunita Ghosh; Maryla Stiles; Ruzica Jokic; Heather Ward; David Cotton Journal: Chest Date: 2010-02-19 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Samuel T Kuna; Indira Gurubhagavatula; Greg Maislin; Sakhena Hin; Kathryn C Hartwig; Sue McCloskey; Robert Hachadoorian; Sharon Hurley; Rajesh Gupta; Bethany Staley; Charles W Atwood Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-01-21 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Nancy A Collop; W McDowell Anderson; Brian Boehlecke; David Claman; Rochelle Goldberg; Daniel J Gottlieb; David Hudgel; Michael Sateia; Richard Schwab Journal: J Clin Sleep Med Date: 2007-12-15 Impact factor: 4.062