Literature DB >> 25902327

The ED90 of prophylactic oxytocin infusion after delivery of the placenta during cesarean delivery in laboring compared with nonlaboring women: an up-down sequential allocation dose-response study.

Anne Lavoie1, Robert J McCarthy, Cynthia A Wong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic administration of oxytocin as a part of active management of the third stage of labor reduces the risk of postpartum hemorrhage. Prophylactic oxytocin is often administered as an infusion rather than a bolus. The aim of the current up-down sequential allocation dose-response study was to test the hypothesis that parturients who receive intrapartum exogenous oxytocin therapy, and who subsequently undergo cesarean delivery for labor dystocia, will have a higher estimated effective dose in 90% of paturients (ED90) for oxytocin infusion in the third stage of labor compared with nonlaboring parturients.
METHODS: The study design was a single-blinded, dual-arm, dose-response study using a 9:1 biased-coin sequential allocation method to estimate the ED90 of an infusion of prophylactic oxytocin in women undergoing cesarean delivery with neuraxial anesthesia. The experimental (laboring) group included women scheduled for intrapartum cesarean delivery after prior exposure to exogenous oxytocin, and the control (nonlaboring) group included women scheduled for elective cesarean delivery. The starting infusion rate was 18 IU/h, with an incremental dose of 2 IU/h. The outcome was satisfactory uterine tone 4 minutes after delivery as judged by the obstetrician. Secondary outcomes included requirement for additional uterotonic agents and maternal side effects (e.g., nausea and vomiting, ST-segment depression). Dose-response data for each group were evaluated by a log-logistic function and ED90 estimates derived from the fitted equations using the delta method.
RESULTS: Thirty-eight and 32 subjects participated in the nonlaboring and laboring groups, respectively. The oxytocin ED90 was significantly greater for the laboring group (44.2 IU/h [95% confidence interval (CI), 33.8-55.6]) compared with that for the nonlaboring group (16.2 IU/h [95% CI, 13.1-19.3]; difference in dose 28 IU/h [95% CI of difference, 26-29, P < 0.001]). Significantly more women in the laboring group (34%) than in the nonlaboring group (8%) required supplemental uterotonic agents (difference 26% [95% CI of the difference, 7%-44%, P = 0.008]). The overall incidence of side effects was greater in the laboring group (69%) than in the nonlaboring group (34%; difference 25% [95% CI of the difference, 10%-59%, P = 0.004]).
CONCLUSIONS: Women with prior exposure to exogenous oxytocin require a higher initial infusion rate of oxytocin to prevent uterine atony after cesarean delivery than women without prior exposure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25902327     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000781

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  9 in total

1.  Effect of a High-Rate Versus a Low-Rate Oxytocin Infusion for Maintaining Uterine Contractility During Elective Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Adrienne Duffield; Christine McKenzie; Brendan Carvalho; Bharathi Ramachandran; Victoria Yin; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Edward T Riley; Alexander J Butwick
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 2.  A Review of the Impact of Obstetric Anesthesia on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes.

Authors:  Grace Lim; Francesca L Facco; Naveen Nathan; Jonathan H Waters; Cynthia A Wong; Holger K Eltzschig
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Patient blood management in obstetrics: prevention and treatment of postpartum haemorrhage. A NATA consensus statement.

Authors:  Manuel Muñoz; Jakob Stensballe; Anne-Sophie Ducloy-Bouthors; Marie-Pierre Bonnet; Edoardo De Robertis; Ino Fornet; François Goffinet; Stefan Hofer; Wolfgang Holzgreve; Susana Manrique; Jacky Nizard; François Christory; Charles-Marc Samama; Jean-François Hardy
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 4.  Peripartum Haemorrhage: Haemostatic Aspects of the New German PPH Guideline.

Authors:  Heiko Lier; Christian von Heymann; Wolfgang Korte; Dietmar Schlembach
Journal:  Transfus Med Hemother       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 3.747

Review 5.  Lack of controlled studies investigating the risk of postpartum haemorrhage in cesarean delivery after prior use of oxytocin: a scoping review.

Authors:  Karin Bischoff; Monika Nothacker; Cornelius Lehane; Britta Lang; Joerg Meerpohl; Christine Schmucker
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  The Median Effective Dose of Oxytocin Needed to Prevent Uterine Atony During Cesarean Delivery in Elderly Parturients.

Authors:  Chang Na Wei; Jia Li Deng; Jin Hua Dong; Ze Peng Ping; Xin Zhong Chen
Journal:  Drug Des Devel Ther       Date:  2020-12-08       Impact factor: 4.162

Review 7.  Obstetric Anesthesia and Heart Disease: Practical Clinical Considerations.

Authors:  Marie-Louise Meng; Katherine W Arendt
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 8.986

8.  Paucity of evidence for the effectiveness of prophylactic low-dose oxytocin protocols (<5 IU) compared with 5 IU in women undergoing elective caesarean section: A systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Nico C S Terblanche; Dean S Picone; Petr Otahal; James E Sharman
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 4.330

9.  The ED50 and ED95 of oxytocin infusion rate for maintaining uterine tone during elective caesarean delivery: a dose-finding study.

Authors:  Xiao Wei Qian; Dan M Drzymalski; Chang Cheng Lv; Fei He Guo; Lu Yang Wang; Xin Zhong Chen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2019-12-31       Impact factor: 3.007

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.