Literature DB >> 25901981

Computed tomographic morphometric analysis of pediatric clival screw placement at the craniovertebral junction.

Wei Ji1, Gang-Gang Kong, Ming-Hui Zheng, Xiang-Yang Wang, Jian-Ting Chen, Qing-An Zhu.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A computed tomography-based morphometric measurement of the pediatric craniovertebral junction for clival screw placement.
OBJECTIVE: To identify morphometric differences of the pediatric clivus at different ages and establish guidelines for pediatric clival screw fixation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Anterior fixation of the pediatric craniovertebral junction, a viable alternative to posterior occipital-cervical fixation, requires clival screw placement. The morphology of the pediatric clivus may be associated with greater difficulty in adequate purchase because of the spheno-occipital synchondrosis (clival fissure).
METHODS: Morphometric analysis was conducted on computed tomographic scans of the craniocervical junction in 87 pediatric patients who were assigned into groups based on their ages (2-5 yr, 6-9 yr, 10-13 yr, and 14-16 yr). Measurements were made of the sagittal and axial planes to determine the clival length, widest and narrowest clival diameter, clival fissure distance, clival-cervical angle, and putative screw lengths.
RESULTS: The mean clival length, widest diameter, narrowest diameter, fissure distance, and putative screw lengths were 29.4 mm, 28. 9 mm, 17.3 mm, 21.9 mm, and 9.6 mm, respectively. These measurements were significantly different among the groups and highly correlated to age (P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in clival-cervical angle among the groups, with a mean angle of 129.2°± 6.4°. A clival screw (ø3.5 mm) was accommodated for all children older than 10 years, 89% of children aged 6 to 9 years, and 80% of children aged 2 to 5 years.
CONCLUSION: A clival screw fixation is feasible in the pediatric craniovertebral junction, particularly in children aged 10 years or older. The dimensions of the clivus were highly dependent on age. We suggest that all pediatric patients should undergo high-resolution, thin-slice computed tomography preoperatively to assess suitability for clival screw fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25901981     DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000749

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  5 in total

Review 1.  Developmental Considerations in Pediatric Skull Base Surgery.

Authors:  Melissa A LoPresti; Jonathan N Sellin; Franco DeMonte
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2018-01-05

2.  Clival screw and plate fixation by the transoral approach for the craniovertebral junction: a CT-based feasibility study.

Authors:  Junyu Lin; Ganggang Kong; Xiaolin Xu; Qi Liu; Zucheng Huang; Qingan Zhu; Wei Ji
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Anatomical Study on the Safety of Anterior Cervical Craniovertebral Fusion with Clival Screw Placement in Children Aged 1-6 Years.

Authors:  Shao-Jie Zhang; Kun Li; Zhi-Jun Li; Xing Wang; Jia-Hui Dong; Jian Wang; Jie Chen; Xing-Yue Qu; Zi-Yu Li; Yu-Hang Liu
Journal:  Int J Gen Med       Date:  2021-09-16

4.  Clival Screw Placement in Patient with atlas assimilation: A CT-based feasibility study.

Authors:  Wei Ji; Xiang Liu; Wenhan Huang; Zucheng Huang; Jianting Chen; Qingan Zhu; Zenghui Wu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Morphometric Trajectory Analysis for Occipital Condyle Screws.

Authors:  Yu-Kun Du; Si-Yuan Li; Wen-Jiu Yang; Xiang-Yang Wang; Yi-Fang Bi; Jun Dong; Hui Huang; Feng Gao; Gui-Zhi Li; Hua-Wei Wei; Jian-Kun Yang; Yong-Ming Xi
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 2.071

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.