Daniel von Rhein1, Roshan Cools2, Marcel P Zwiers2, Marieke van der Schaaf3, Barbara Franke4, Marjolein Luman5, Jaap Oosterlaan5, Dirk J Heslenfeld5, Pieter J Hoekstra6, Catharina A Hartman6, Stephen V Faraone7, Daan van Rooij8, Eelco V van Dongen2, Maria Lojowska4, Maarten Mennes2, Jan Buitelaar9. 1. Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. Electronic address: Daniel.vonRhein@donders.ru.nl. 2. Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud University Nijmegen, Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging, Nijmegen, the Netherlands. 3. Radboud University Nijmegen and Donders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging. 4. Radboud University Medical Center. 5. VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam. 6. University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen. 7. State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, USA. 8. Radboud University Medical Center; University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands. 9. Radboud University Medical Center; Karakter, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry University Center Nijmegen.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a heritable neuropsychiatric disorder associated with abnormal reward processing. Limited and inconsistent data exist about the neural mechanisms underlying this abnormality. Furthermore, it is not known whether reward processing is abnormal in unaffected siblings of participants with ADHD. METHOD: We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate brain responses during reward anticipation and receipt with an adapted monetary incentive delay task in a large sample of adolescents and young adults with ADHD (n = 150), their unaffected siblings (n = 92), and control participants (n = 108), all of the same age. RESULTS: Participants with ADHD showed, relative to control participants, increased responses in the anterior cingulate, anterior frontal cortex, and cerebellum during reward anticipation, and in the orbitofrontal, occipital cortex and ventral striatum. Responses of unaffected siblings were increased in these regions as well, except for the cerebellum during anticipation and ventral striatum during receipt. CONCLUSION: ADHD in adolescents and young adults is associated with enhanced neural responses in frontostriatal circuitry to anticipation and receipt of reward. The findings support models emphasizing aberrant reward processing in ADHD, and suggest that processing of reward is subject to familial influences. Future studies using standard monetary incentive delay task parameters are needed to replicate our findings.
OBJECTIVE:Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a heritable neuropsychiatric disorder associated with abnormal reward processing. Limited and inconsistent data exist about the neural mechanisms underlying this abnormality. Furthermore, it is not known whether reward processing is abnormal in unaffected siblings of participants with ADHD. METHOD: We used event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to investigate brain responses during reward anticipation and receipt with an adapted monetary incentive delay task in a large sample of adolescents and young adults with ADHD (n = 150), their unaffected siblings (n = 92), and control participants (n = 108), all of the same age. RESULTS:Participants with ADHD showed, relative to control participants, increased responses in the anterior cingulate, anterior frontal cortex, and cerebellum during reward anticipation, and in the orbitofrontal, occipital cortex and ventral striatum. Responses of unaffected siblings were increased in these regions as well, except for the cerebellum during anticipation and ventral striatum during receipt. CONCLUSION:ADHD in adolescents and young adults is associated with enhanced neural responses in frontostriatal circuitry to anticipation and receipt of reward. The findings support models emphasizing aberrant reward processing in ADHD, and suggest that processing of reward is subject to familial influences. Future studies using standard monetary incentive delay task parameters are needed to replicate our findings.
Authors: Yannis Paloyelis; Mitul A Mehta; Stephen V Faraone; Philip Asherson; Jonna Kuntsi Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2012-06-05 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2004 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Jean-Claude Dreher; Philip Kohn; Bhaskar Kolachana; Daniel R Weinberger; Karen Faith Berman Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2008-12-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Nanda N J Rommelse; Marieke E Altink; Neilson C Martin; Cathelijne J M Buschgens; Jan K Buitelaar; Joseph A Sergeant; Jaap Oosterlaan Journal: Arch Clin Neuropsychol Date: 2008-07-16 Impact factor: 2.813
Authors: Caitlin E Carey; Annchen R Knodt; Emily Drabant Conley; Ahmad R Hariri; Ryan Bogdan Journal: Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging Date: 2017-03
Authors: Daniel von Rhein; Christian F Beckmann; Barbara Franke; Jaap Oosterlaan; Dirk J Heslenfeld; Pieter J Hoekstra; Catharina A Hartman; Marjolein Luman; Stephen V Faraone; Roshan Cools; Jan K Buitelaar; Maarten Mennes Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-02-08 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Joseph C Blader; Steven R Pliszka; Vivian Kafantaris; Colin Sauder; Jonathan Posner; Carmel A Foley; Gabrielle A Carlson; Judith A Crowell; David M Margulies Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-01-08 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Ellen M Kessel; Lea R Dougherty; Autumn Kujawa; Greg Hajcak; Gabrielle A Carlson; Daniel N Klein Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Randy P Auerbach; David Pagliaccio; Grace O Allison; Kira L Alqueza; Maria Fernanda Alonso Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2020-06-10 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Michael I Demidenko; Alexander S Weigard; Karthikeyan Ganesan; Hyesue Jang; Andrew Jahn; Edward D Huntley; Daniel P Keating Journal: Brain Behav Date: 2021-03-22 Impact factor: 2.708