Literature DB >> 25901627

Minimally invasive reconstruction of acute type IV and Type V acromioclavicular separations.

Dimitris L Katsenis, Dimitris Stamoulis, Dimitris Begkas, Stamatis Tsamados.   

Abstract

The goal of this study was to evaluate the midterm radiologic, clinical, and functional results of the early reconstruction of the severe acromioclavicular joint dislocation using the flipptack fixation button technique. Between December 2006 and December 2009, one hundred thirty-five consecutive patients with acromioclavicular joint separations were admitted to the authors' institution. Fifty patients were included in the study. According to Rockwood classification, 29 (58%) dislocations were type IV and 21 (42%) were type V. Surgery was performed at an average of 4.2 days (range, 0-12 days) after dislocation. All dislocations were treated with the flipptack fixation button technique. All patients were evaluated at a final postoperative follow-up of 42 months (range, 36-49 months). The clinical outcome was assessed using the Constant score. The functional limitation was assessed using the bother index of the short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment. Radiographs taken immediately postoperatively and at the final follow-up assessed acromioclavicular joint reduction, coracoclavicular distance, and joint arthrosis. At the final follow-up, mean Constant score was 93.04 (range, 84-100). The average (±SD) short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment bother index was 20.88±8.95 (range, 2.0-49). No statistically significant difference was found between the acromioclavicular joint dislocation type and the clinical result (P=.227; chi-square, 6.910, Kruskal Wallis test). The regression of the coracoclavicular distance at final follow-up was not statistically significant (P=.276; chi-square, 6.319, Kruskal Wallis test). The flipptack fixation button technique is an effective alternative for the treatment of severe acromioclavicular joint dislocation. Because all objectives of the treatment were obtained, the results do not deteriorate over time. Copyright 2015, SLACK Incorporated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25901627     DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20150402-62

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopedics        ISSN: 0147-7447            Impact factor:   1.390


  4 in total

Review 1.  Biologic and synthetic ligament reconstructions achieve better functional scores compared to osteosynthesis in the treatment of acute acromioclavicular joint dislocation.

Authors:  Maristella F Saccomanno; Giuseppe Sircana; Valentina Cardona; Valeria Vismara; Alessandra Scaini; Andrea G Salvi; Stefano Galli; Giacomo Marchi; Giuseppe Milano
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-08-14       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Post-operative outcomes and complications of suspensory loop fixation device versus hook plate in acute unstable acromioclavicular joint dislocation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alisara Arirachakaran; Manusak Boonard; Peerapong Piyapittayanun; Wichan Kanchanatawan; Kornkit Chaijenkij; Akom Prommahachai; Jatupon Kongtharvonskul
Journal:  J Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2017-02-25

3.  Methods used to assess the severity of acromioclavicular joint separations in Japan: a survey.

Authors:  Katsumi Takase; Yukihiko Hata; Yutaka Morisawa; Masafumi Goto; Sakae Tanaka; Junichiro Hamada; Kenji Hayashida; Yasunari Fujii; Toru Morihara; Nobuyuki Yamamoto; Hiroaki Inui; Hiroyuki Shiozaki
Journal:  JSES Int       Date:  2020-02-13

4.  Low rate of substantial loss of reduction immediately after hardware removal following acromioclavicular joint stabilization using a suspensory fixation system.

Authors:  Marco-Christopher Rupp; Pavel M Kadantsev; Sebastian Siebenlist; Maximilian Hinz; Matthias J Feucht; Jonas Pogorzelski; Bastian Scheiderer; Andreas B Imhoff; Lukas N Muench; Daniel P Berthold
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 4.114

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.