Literature DB >> 25900725

Effect of intraluminal thrombus asymmetrical deposition on abdominal aortic aneurysm growth rate.

Eleni Metaxa1, Nikolaos Kontopodis2, Konstantinos Tzirakis1, Christos V Ioannou3, Yannis Papaharilaou4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between asymmetrical intraluminal thrombus (ILT) deposition in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) and growth rate and to explore its biomechanical perspective.
METHODS: Thirty-four patients with AAA underwent at least 2 computed tomography scans during surveillance. The volumes of the AAA (VAAA) and thrombus (VILT) and the maximum thrombus thickness (ILTthick) were computed. Thrombus distribution was evaluated by introducing the asymmetrical thrombus deposition index (ATDI), with positive and negative values (-1<ATDI<1) associated with anterior and posterior ILT deposition, respectively. Finite element analysis was applied to estimate wall stress. Aneurysms were divided into high and low growth rate groups based on the cohort's median growth rate, and the abovementioned parameters were compared between groups.
RESULTS: Most AAAs had asymmetrical anterior thrombus deposition. The high and low growth rate groups did not present significant differences in maximum diameter, VAAA, VILT, or maximum ILTthick. However, the high growth rate group had significantly higher ATDI (p=0.02). The ATDI<0 group (posterior ILT distribution) presented a significantly lower median growth rate compared to that of ATDI≥0 group (anterior or symmetrical ILT deposition; p=0.029). The specificity of an ATDI<0 criterion for identifying AAAs with a growth rate below the cohort median was 89%. The ATDI<0 group had a significantly lower posterior maximum wall stress compared with that of the ATDI≥0 group (p=0.03). Overall peak wall stress did not differ between groups.
CONCLUSION: Posterior thrombus deposition in AAAs is associated with significantly lower growth rate and lower posterior maximum wall stress compared with that of AAAs with anterior thrombus deposition and could potentially indicate a lower rupture risk.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  abdominal aortic aneurysm; asymmetrical thrombus deposition index; biomechanics; intraluminal thrombus; intrasac thrombus; rupture risk; sac growth rate; stress analysis; volumetric analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25900725     DOI: 10.1177/1526602815584018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  10 in total

1.  A novel approach for local abdominal aortic aneurysm growth quantification.

Authors:  Eleni Metaxa; Iordan Iordanov; Emmanuel Maravelakis; Yannis Papaharilaou
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Non-contrast 3D black blood MRI for abdominal aortic aneurysm surveillance: comparison with CT angiography.

Authors:  Chengcheng Zhu; Bing Tian; Joseph R Leach; Qi Liu; Jianping Lu; Luguang Chen; David Saloner; Michael D Hope
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  New predictors of aneurysm sac behavior after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Min-Jae Jeong; Hyunwook Kwon; Gi-Young Ko; Dong Il Gwon; Min-Ju Kim; Youngjin Han; Tae-Won Kwon; Yong-Pil Cho
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-06-27       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  A Deep Learning Approach to Visualise Aortic Aneurysm Morphology without the Use of Intravenous Contrast Agents.

Authors:  Anirudh Chandrashekar; Ashok Handa; Pierfrancesco Lapolla; Natesh Shivakumar; Raman Uberoi; Vicente Grau; Regent Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-03-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 5.  The Obsolete Maximum Diameter Criterion, the Evident Role of Biomechanical (Pressure) Indices, the New Role of Hemodynamic (Flow) Indices, and the Multi-Modal Approach to the Rupture Risk Assessment of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kontopodis; Konstantinos Tzirakis; Christos V Ioannou
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2018-03-25

Review 6.  The Detrimental Role of Intraluminal Thrombus Outweighs Protective Advantage in Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Pathogenesis: The Implications for the Anti-Platelet Therapy.

Authors:  Xiaoying Ma; Shibo Xia; Guangqin Liu; Chao Song
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2022-07-05

Review 7.  The - Not So - Solid 5.5 cm Threshold for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Facts, Misinterpretations, and Future Directions.

Authors:  Nikolaos Kontopodis; Dimitrios Pantidis; Athansios Dedes; Nikolaos Daskalakis; Christos V Ioannou
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2016-01-25

8.  Systematic Review of Circulating, Biomechanical, and Genetic Markers for the Prediction of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Growth and Rupture.

Authors:  Menno E Groeneveld; Jorn P Meekel; Sidney M Rubinstein; Lisanne R Merkestein; Geert Jan Tangelder; Willem Wisselink; Maarten Truijers; Kak Khee Yeung
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Intraluminal thrombus effect on the progression of abdominal aortic aneurysms by using a multistate continuous-time Markov chain model.

Authors:  Liangliang Zhang; Byron A Zambrano; Jongeun Choi; Whal Lee; Seungik Baek; Chae Young Lim
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.671

10.  Geometric and biomechanical modeling aided by machine learning improves the prediction of growth and rupture of small abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Moritz Lindquist Liljeqvist; Marko Bogdanovic; Antti Siika; T Christian Gasser; Rebecka Hultgren; Joy Roy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.