Literature DB >> 25900342

Slice-to-volume deformable registration: efficient one-shot consensus between plane selection and in-plane deformation.

Enzo Ferrante1, Vivien Fecamp, Nikos Paragios.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This paper introduces a novel decomposed graphical model to deal with slice-to-volume registration in the context of medical images and image-guided surgeries.
METHODS: We present a new non-rigid slice-to-volume registration method whose main contribution is the ability to decouple the plane selection and the in-plane deformation parts of the transformation--through two distinct graphs--toward reducing the complexity of the model while being able to obtain simultaneously the solution for both of them. To this end, the plane selection process is expressed as a local graph-labeling problem endowed with planarity satisfaction constraints, which is then directly linked with the deformable part through the data registration likelihoods. The resulting model is modular with respect to the image metric, can cope with arbitrary in-plane regularization terms and inherits excellent properties in terms of computational efficiency.
RESULTS: The proof of concept for the proposed formulation is done using cardiac MR sequences of a beating heart (an artificially generated 2D temporal sequence is extracted using real data with known ground truth) as well as multimodal brain images involving ultrasound and computed tomography images. We achieve state-of-the-art results while decreasing the computational time when we compare with another method based on similar techniques.
CONCLUSIONS: We confirm that graphical models and discrete optimization techniques are suitable to solve non-rigid slice-to-volume registration problems. Moreover, we show that decoupling the graphical model and labeling it using two lower-dimensional label spaces, we can achieve state-of-the-art results while substantially reducing the complexity of our method and moving the approach close to real clinical applications once considered in the context of modern parallel architectures.

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25900342     DOI: 10.1007/s11548-015-1205-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg        ISSN: 1861-6410            Impact factor:   2.924


  15 in total

1.  Stochastic relaxation, gibbs distributions, and the bayesian restoration of images.

Authors:  S Geman; D Geman
Journal:  IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 6.226

Review 2.  A review of 3D/2D registration methods for image-guided interventions.

Authors:  P Markelj; D Tomaževič; B Likar; F Pernuš
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-04-13       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  Linear intensity-based image registration by Markov random fields and discrete optimization.

Authors:  Darko Zikic; Ben Glocker; Oliver Kutter; Martin Groher; Nikos Komodakis; Ali Kamen; Nikos Paragios; Nassir Navab
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-04-29       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Rigid 2D/3D slice-to-volume registration and its application on fluoroscopic CT images.

Authors:  Wolfgang Birkfellner; Michael Figl; Joachim Kettenbach; Johann Hummel; Peter Homolka; Rüdiger Schernthaner; Thomas Nau; Helmar Bergmann
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Nonrigid registration of dynamic renal MR images using a saliency based MRF model.

Authors:  Dwarikanath Mahapatra; Ying Sun
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2008

Review 6.  Deformable medical image registration: setting the state of the art with discrete methods.

Authors:  Ben Glocker; Aristeidis Sotiras; Nikos Komodakis; Nikos Paragios
Journal:  Annu Rev Biomed Eng       Date:  2011-08-15       Impact factor: 9.590

7.  Non-rigid 2D-3D medical image registration using markov random fields.

Authors:  Enzo Ferrante; Nikos Paragios
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2013

8.  Online database of clinical MR and ultrasound images of brain tumors.

Authors:  Laurence Mercier; Rolando F Del Maestro; Kevin Petrecca; David Araujo; Claire Haegelen; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 9.  MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Leonard Marks; Shelena Young; Shyam Natarajan
Journal:  Curr Opin Urol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.309

10.  Towards real time 2D to 3D registration for ultrasound-guided endoscopic and laparoscopic procedures.

Authors:  Raúl San José Estépar; Carl-Fredrik Westin; Kirby G Vosburgh
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2009-06-23       Impact factor: 2.924

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Unintended Consequences of Sensor, Signal, and Imaging Informatics: New Problems and New Solutions.

Authors:  C Hughes; S Voros; A Moreau-Gaudry
Journal:  Yearb Med Inform       Date:  2016-11-10

Review 2.  IBIS: an OR ready open-source platform for image-guided neurosurgery.

Authors:  Simon Drouin; Anna Kochanowska; Marta Kersten-Oertel; Ian J Gerard; Rina Zelmann; Dante De Nigris; Silvain Bériault; Tal Arbel; Denis Sirhan; Abbas F Sadikot; Jeffery A Hall; David S Sinclair; Kevin Petrecca; Rolando F DelMaestro; D Louis Collins
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Two-dimensional ultrasound-computed tomography image registration for monitoring percutaneous hepatic intervention.

Authors:  Robert M Pohlman; Michael R Turney; Po-Hung Wu; Christopher L Brace; Timothy J Ziemlewicz; Tomy Varghese
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2019-05-06       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 4.  An Overview on Image Registration Techniques for Cardiac Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Azira Khalil; Siew-Cheok Ng; Yih Miin Liew; Khin Wee Lai
Journal:  Cardiol Res Pract       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 1.866

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.