G H Lopez1, J Morrison2, J A Condon3, B Wilson2, J R Martin2, Y-W Liew2, R L Flower1, C A Hyland1. 1. Research and Development, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia. 2. Red Cell Reference Laboratory, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, Kelvin Grove, QLD, Australia. 3. Red Cell Reference Laboratory, Australian Red Cross Blood Service, West Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Duffy blood group phenotypes can be predicted by genotyping for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) responsible for the Fy(a) /Fy(b) polymorphism, for weak Fy(b) antigen, and for the red cell null Fy(a-b-) phenotype. This study correlates Duffy phenotype predictions with serotyping to assess the most reliable procedure for typing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples, n = 155 (135 donors and 20 patients), were genotyped by high-resolution melt PCR and by microarray. Samples were in three serology groups: 1) Duffy patterns expected n = 79, 2) weak and equivocal Fy(b) patterns n = 29 and 3) Fy(a-b-) n = 47 (one with anti-Fy3 antibody). RESULTS: Discrepancies were observed for five samples. For two, SNP genotyping predicted weak Fy(b) expression discrepant with Fy(b-) (Group 1 and 3). For three, SNP genotyping predicted Fy(a) , discrepant with Fy(a-b-) (Group 3). DNA sequencing identified silencing mutations in these FY*A alleles. One was a novel FY*A 719delG. One, the sample with the anti-Fy3, was homozygous for a 14-bp deletion (FY*01N.02); a true null. CONCLUSION: Both the high-resolution melting analysis and SNP microarray assays were concordant and showed genotyping, as well as phenotyping, is essential to ensure 100% accuracy for Duffy blood group assignments. Sequencing is important to resolve phenotype/genotype conflicts which here identified alleles, one novel, that carry silencing mutations. The risk of alloimmunisation may be dependent on this zygosity status.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Duffy blood group phenotypes can be predicted by genotyping for single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) responsible for the Fy(a) /Fy(b) polymorphism, for weak Fy(b) antigen, and for the red cell null Fy(a-b-) phenotype. This study correlates Duffy phenotype predictions with serotyping to assess the most reliable procedure for typing. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Samples, n = 155 (135 donors and 20 patients), were genotyped by high-resolution melt PCR and by microarray. Samples were in three serology groups: 1) Duffy patterns expected n = 79, 2) weak and equivocal Fy(b) patterns n = 29 and 3) Fy(a-b-) n = 47 (one with anti-Fy3 antibody). RESULTS: Discrepancies were observed for five samples. For two, SNP genotyping predicted weak Fy(b) expression discrepant with Fy(b-) (Group 1 and 3). For three, SNP genotyping predicted Fy(a) , discrepant with Fy(a-b-) (Group 3). DNA sequencing identified silencing mutations in these FY*A alleles. One was a novel FY*A 719delG. One, the sample with the anti-Fy3, was homozygous for a 14-bp deletion (FY*01N.02); a true null. CONCLUSION: Both the high-resolution melting analysis and SNP microarray assays were concordant and showed genotyping, as well as phenotyping, is essential to ensure 100% accuracy for Duffy blood group assignments. Sequencing is important to resolve phenotype/genotype conflicts which here identified alleles, one novel, that carry silencing mutations. The risk of alloimmunisation may be dependent on this zygosity status.
Authors: Genghis H Lopez; Brett Wilson; Robyn M Turner; Glenda M Millard; Nicole S Fraser; Naomi M Roots; Yew-Wah Liew; Catherine A Hyland; Robert L Flower Journal: Transfus Med Hemother Date: 2019-11-14 Impact factor: 3.747
Authors: Brittany D Jenkins; Rachel N Martini; Rupali Hire; Andrea Brown; Briana Bennett; I'nasia Brown; Elizabeth W Howerth; Mary Egan; Jamie Hodgson; Clayton Yates; Rick Kittles; Dhananjay Chitale; Haythem Ali; David Nathanson; Petros Nikolinakos; Lisa Newman; Michele Monteil; Melissa B Davis Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-04 Impact factor: 4.090