Diana Bell1, Matthew C Sniegowski2, Khalida Wani1, Victor Prieto1, Bita Esmaeli2. 1. Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. 2. Orbital Oncology and Ophthalmic Plastic Surgery Program, Department of Plastic Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lacrimal gland carcinomas are rare. Identification of molecular abnormalities underlying lacrimal gland carcinogenesis is critical to the development of new targeted therapies for lacrimal gland carcinomas. The purpose of our study was to look for mutations that can be targeted as new treatments for lacrimal gland carcinomas. METHODS: Genomic DNA from patients with lacrimal gland epithelial neoplasms was analyzed. The Sequenom matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass ARRAY platform was used to profile 168 common oncogenic point mutations in 40 genes. Mutation frequency was assessed overall and by histologic diagnosis. These genetic mutations were then correlated with clinical outcomes in the patients. RESULTS: The study included 14 men and 10 women with a median age of 45 years (range, 17-75 years). The histologic diagnoses were as follows: adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 16), low-grade carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (n = 2), high-grade carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (n = 2), squamous carcinoma (n = 1), and pleomorphic adenoma (n = 3). Analysis revealed 18 oncogenic mutations in 13 patients: KRAS mutations in 10 patients (46%), NRAS mutations in 2 patients (8%), MET mutations in 3 patients (13%), PIK3CA mutation in 1 patient (4%), and BRAF mutation in no patients. About half of the patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma had oncogenic mutations (7 of 16; 44%). Of the 16 patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma, 5 had KRAS mutations, 1 had MET mutations, and 1 had an NRAS mutation. CONCLUSION: KRAS, NRAS, and MET mutations are frequent in epithelial neoplasms of the lacrimal gland, with the highest rate of mutations found in adenoid cystic carcinoma. Therapies targeting these genes may be effective treatments for lacrimal gland carcinomas.
BACKGROUND: Lacrimal gland carcinomas are rare. Identification of molecular abnormalities underlying lacrimal gland carcinogenesis is critical to the development of new targeted therapies for lacrimal gland carcinomas. The purpose of our study was to look for mutations that can be targeted as new treatments for lacrimal gland carcinomas. METHODS: Genomic DNA from patients with lacrimal gland epithelial neoplasms was analyzed. The Sequenom matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) mass ARRAY platform was used to profile 168 common oncogenic point mutations in 40 genes. Mutation frequency was assessed overall and by histologic diagnosis. These genetic mutations were then correlated with clinical outcomes in the patients. RESULTS: The study included 14 men and 10 women with a median age of 45 years (range, 17-75 years). The histologic diagnoses were as follows: adenoid cystic carcinoma (n = 16), low-grade carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (n = 2), high-grade carcinoma ex pleomorphic adenoma (n = 2), squamous carcinoma (n = 1), and pleomorphic adenoma (n = 3). Analysis revealed 18 oncogenic mutations in 13 patients: KRAS mutations in 10 patients (46%), NRAS mutations in 2 patients (8%), MET mutations in 3 patients (13%), PIK3CA mutation in 1 patient (4%), and BRAF mutation in no patients. About half of the patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma had oncogenic mutations (7 of 16; 44%). Of the 16 patients with adenoid cystic carcinoma, 5 had KRAS mutations, 1 had MET mutations, and 1 had an NRAS mutation. CONCLUSION:KRAS, NRAS, and MET mutations are frequent in epithelial neoplasms of the lacrimal gland, with the highest rate of mutations found in adenoid cystic carcinoma. Therapies targeting these genes may be effective treatments for lacrimal gland carcinomas.
Authors: Amalia Milano; Francesco Longo; Maria Basile; Rosario V Iaffaioli; Francesco Caponigro Journal: Oral Oncol Date: 2007-03-09 Impact factor: 5.337
Authors: Guy Andry; Marc Hamoir; Laura D Locati; Lisa Licitra; Johannes A Langendijk Journal: Expert Rev Anticancer Ther Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 4.512
Authors: David W Sant; Wensi Tao; Matthew G Field; Daniel Pelaez; Ke Jin; Anthony Capobianco; Sander R Dubovy; David T Tse; Gaofeng Wang Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2017-05-01 Impact factor: 4.799