J M Heuckmann1, R K Thomas2. 1. New Oncology, Blackfield AG, Cologne. 2. Department of Translational Genomics, Medical Faculty, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. Electronic address: roman.thomas@uni-koeln.de.
Abstract
The identification of 'druggable' kinase gene alterations has revolutionized cancer treatment in the last decade by providing new and successfully targetable drug targets. Thus, genotyping tumors for matching the right patients with the right drugs have become a clinical routine. Today, advances in sequencing technology and computational genome analyses enable the discovery of a constantly growing number of genome alterations relevant for clinical decision making. As a consequence, several technological approaches have emerged in order to deal with these rapidly increasing demands for clinical cancer genome analyses. Here, we describe challenges on the path to the broad introduction of diagnostic cancer genome analyses and the technologies that can be applied to overcome them. We define three generations of molecular diagnostics that are in clinical use. The latest generation of these approaches involves deep and thus, highly sensitive sequencing of all therapeutically relevant types of genome alterations-mutations, copy number alterations and rearrangements/fusions-in a single assay. Such approaches therefore have substantial advantages (less time and less tissue required) over PCR-based methods that typically have to be combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of gene amplifications and fusions. Since these new technologies work reliably on routine diagnostic formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens, they can help expedite the broad introduction of personalized cancer therapy into the clinic by providing comprehensive, sensitive and accurate cancer genome diagnoses in 'real-time'.
The identification of 'druggable' kinase gene alterations has revolutionized cancer treatment in the last decade by providing new and successfully targetable drug targets. Thus, genotyping tumors for matching the right patients with the right drugs have become a clinical routine. Today, advances in sequencing technology and computational genome analyses enable the discovery of a constantly growing number of genome alterations relevant for clinical decision making. As a consequence, several technological approaches have emerged in order to deal with these rapidly increasing demands for clinical cancer genome analyses. Here, we describe challenges on the path to the broad introduction of diagnostic cancer genome analyses and the technologies that can be applied to overcome them. We define three generations of molecular diagnostics that are in clinical use. The latest generation of these approaches involves deep and thus, highly sensitive sequencing of all therapeutically relevant types of genome alterations-mutations, copy number alterations and rearrangements/fusions-in a single assay. Such approaches therefore have substantial advantages (less time and less tissue required) over PCR-based methods that typically have to be combined with fluorescence in situ hybridization for detection of gene amplifications and fusions. Since these new technologies work reliably on routine diagnostic formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded specimens, they can help expedite the broad introduction of personalized cancer therapy into the clinic by providing comprehensive, sensitive and accurate cancer genome diagnoses in 'real-time'.
Authors: Lin Xu; Yanbin Zheng; Jing Liu; Dinesh Rakheja; Sydney Singleterry; Theodore W Laetsch; Jack F Shern; Javed Khan; Timothy J Triche; Douglas S Hawkins; James F Amatruda; Stephen X Skapek Journal: Cell Rep Date: 2018-07-03 Impact factor: 9.423
Authors: Yock Ping Chow; Lu Ping Tan; San Jiun Chai; Norazlin Abdul Aziz; Siew Woh Choo; Paul Vey Hong Lim; Rajadurai Pathmanathan; Noor Kaslina Mohd Kornain; Chee Lun Lum; Kin Choo Pua; Yoke Yeow Yap; Tee Yong Tan; Soo Hwang Teo; Alan Soo-Beng Khoo; Vyomesh Patel Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Daniel L Hertz; Andrew Glatz; Amy L Pasternak; Robert J Lonigro; Pankaj Vats; Yi-Mi Wu; Bailey Anderson; Erica Rabban; Erika Mora; Kevin Frank; Dan R Robinson; Rajen J Mody; Arul Chinnaiyan Journal: JCO Precis Oncol Date: 2018-07-23
Authors: Kevin E Fisher; Linsheng Zhang; Jason Wang; Geoffrey H Smith; Scott Newman; Thomas M Schneider; Rathi N Pillai; Ragini R Kudchadkar; Taofeek K Owonikoko; Suresh S Ramalingam; David H Lawson; Keith A Delman; Bassel F El-Rayes; Malania M Wilson; H Clifford Sullivan; Annie S Morrison; Serdar Balci; N Volkan Adsay; Anthony A Gal; Gabriel L Sica; Debra F Saxe; Karen P Mann; Charles E Hill; Fadlo R Khuri; Michael R Rossi Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2016-01-20 Impact factor: 5.568