Jennifer L Wiler1, Shari Welch2,3, Jesse Pines4, Jeremiah Schuur5, Nick Jouriles6, Suzanne Stone-Griffith7. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO. 2. Intermountain Institute for Healthcare Delivery Research, Salt Lake City, UT. 3. Emergency Department Benchmarking Alliance, Newark, DE. 4. Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University, Washington, DC. 5. Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard University, Boston, MA. 6. Department of Emergency Medicine, Northeast Ohio Medical University, Akron, OH. 7. HCA, Continental Division, Denver, CO.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to review and update key definitions and metrics for emergency department (ED) performance and operations. METHODS: Forty-five emergency medicine leaders convened for the Third Performance Measures and Benchmarking Summit held in Las Vegas, February 21-22, 2014. Prior to arrival, attendees were assigned to workgroups to review, revise, and update the definitions and vocabulary being used to communicate about ED performance and operations. They were provided with the prior definitions of those consensus summits that were published in 2006 and 2010. Other published definitions from key stakeholders in emergency medicine and health care were also reviewed and circulated. At the summit, key terminology and metrics were discussed and debated. Workgroups communicated online, via teleconference, and finally in a face-to-face meeting to reach consensus regarding their recommendations. Recommendations were then posted and open to a 30-day comment period. Participants then reanalyzed the recommendations, and modifications were made based on consensus. RESULTS: A comprehensive dictionary of ED terminology related to ED performance and operation was developed. This article includes definitions of operating characteristics and internal and external factors relevant to the stratification and categorization of EDs. Time stamps, time intervals, and measures of utilization were defined. Definitions of processes and staffing measures are also presented. Definitions were harmonized with performance measures put forth by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for consistency. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized definitions are necessary to improve the comparability of EDs nationally for operations research and practice. More importantly, clear precise definitions describing ED operations are needed for incentive-based pay-for-performance models like those developed by CMS. This document provides a common language for front-line practitioners, managers, health policymakers, and researchers.
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to review and update key definitions and metrics for emergency department (ED) performance and operations. METHODS: Forty-five emergency medicine leaders convened for the Third Performance Measures and Benchmarking Summit held in Las Vegas, February 21-22, 2014. Prior to arrival, attendees were assigned to workgroups to review, revise, and update the definitions and vocabulary being used to communicate about ED performance and operations. They were provided with the prior definitions of those consensus summits that were published in 2006 and 2010. Other published definitions from key stakeholders in emergency medicine and health care were also reviewed and circulated. At the summit, key terminology and metrics were discussed and debated. Workgroups communicated online, via teleconference, and finally in a face-to-face meeting to reach consensus regarding their recommendations. Recommendations were then posted and open to a 30-day comment period. Participants then reanalyzed the recommendations, and modifications were made based on consensus. RESULTS: A comprehensive dictionary of ED terminology related to ED performance and operation was developed. This article includes definitions of operating characteristics and internal and external factors relevant to the stratification and categorization of EDs. Time stamps, time intervals, and measures of utilization were defined. Definitions of processes and staffing measures are also presented. Definitions were harmonized with performance measures put forth by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for consistency. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized definitions are necessary to improve the comparability of EDs nationally for operations research and practice. More importantly, clear precise definitions describing ED operations are needed for incentive-based pay-for-performance models like those developed by CMS. This document provides a common language for front-line practitioners, managers, health policymakers, and researchers.
Authors: Maame Yaa A B Yiadom; Christopher W Baugh; Tyler W Barrett; Xulei Liu; Alan B Storrow; Timothy J Vogus; Vikram Tiwari; Corey M Slovis; Stephan Russ; Dandan Liu Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2018-01 Impact factor: 3.451
Authors: Ryan E Tsuchida; Adrianne N Haggins; Marcia Perry; Chiu-Mei Chen; Richard P Medlin; William J Meurer; John Burkhardt; Christopher M Fung Journal: AEM Educ Train Date: 2021-09-29
Authors: Arjun K Venkatesh; Jean Elizabeth Scofi; Craig Rothenberg; Carl T Berdahl; Nalani Tarrant; Dhruv Sharma; Pawan Goyal; Randy Pilgrim; Kevin Klauer; Jeremiah D Schuur Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2020-01-17 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Kusum S Mathews; Kevin P Seitz; Kelly C Vranas; Abhijit Duggal; Thomas S Valley; Bo Zhao; Stephanie Gundel; Michael O Harhay; Steven Y Chang; Catherine L Hough Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2021-07-01 Impact factor: 9.296