Literature DB >> 25899560

Patient preference: a comparison of electronic patient-completed questionnaires with paper among cancer patients.

P Martin1, M C Brown2, O Espin-Garcia3, S Cuffe1, D Pringle2, M Mahler2, J Villeneuve2, C Niu2, R Charow2, C Lam2, R M Shani2, H Hon2, M Otsuka4, W Xu3, S Alibhai5, J Jenkinson4, G Liu1.   

Abstract

In this study, we compared cancer patients preference for computerised (tablet/web-based) surveys versus paper. We also assessed whether the understanding of a cancer-related topic, pharmacogenomics is affected by the survey format, and examined differences in demographic and medical characteristics which may affect patient preference and understanding. Three hundred and four cancer patients completed a tablet-administered survey and another 153 patients completed a paper-based survey. Patients who participated in the tablet survey were questioned regarding their preference for survey format administration (paper, tablet and web-based). Understanding was assessed with a 'direct' method, by asking patients to assess their understanding of genetic testing, and with a 'composite' score. Patients preferred administration with tablet (71%) compared with web-based (12%) and paper (17%). Patients <65 years old, non-Caucasians and white-collar professionals significantly preferred the computerised format following multivariate analysis. There was no significant difference in understanding between the paper and tablet survey with direct questioning or composite score. Age (<65 years) and white-collar professionals were associated with increased understanding (both P = 0.03). There was no significant difference in understanding between the tablet and print survey in a multivariate analysis. Patients overwhelmingly preferred computerised surveys and understanding of pharmacogenomics was not affected by survey format.
© 2015 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  patient; preference; tablet; technologies; understanding; web

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25899560     DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)        ISSN: 0961-5423            Impact factor:   2.520


  2 in total

1.  Improving Response Rates and Representation of Hard-to-Reach Groups in Family Experience Surveys.

Authors:  Sara L Toomey; Marc N Elliott; Alan M Zaslavsky; Jessica Quinn; David J Klein; Stephanie Wagner; Cassandra Thomson; Melody Wu; Sarah Onorato; Mark A Schuster
Journal:  Acad Pediatr       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 3.107

2.  Barriers and Enablers to Using a Patient-Facing Electronic Questionnaire: A Qualitative Theoretical Domains Framework Analysis.

Authors:  Janet Yamada; Andrew Kouri; Sarah-Nicole Simard; Stephanie A Segovia; Samir Gupta
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 5.428

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.