Quantao Zeng1, Wendan Tao1, Chunyan Lei1, Wei Dong1, Ming Liu2. 1. Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. 2. Department of Neurology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China. Electronic address: wyplmh@hotmail.com.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many clinicians regard posterior circulation infarction (PCI) as different from anterior circulation infarction (ACI), leading them to apply different treatments. Few studies have validated this practice by directly comparing the etiology and risk factors of PCI and ACI. METHODS: We compared the etiology and risk factors of 2245 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of PCI or ACI confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging in the Chengdu Stroke Registry. Stroke etiology in each patient was classified according to Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria. RESULTS: Our sample included 482 patients (21.5%) with PCI and 1763 (78.5%) with ACI. The most frequent etiology for both infarction types was small-artery occlusion, occurring in 37.6% of patients with PCI and 37.1% of those with ACI. Cardioembolism caused infarction in a significantly smaller proportion of patients with PCI (5.4%) than in patients with ACI (13.3%; odds ratio [OR] = .373; 95% confidence interval [CI], .245-.566). Frequencies of other stroke etiologies were similar between the 2 patient groups. Analysis of risk factor frequencies in the 2 groups showed hypertension to be the most common, occurring in 47.9% of patients in either group. Multivariable analysis identified 2 factors as conferring greater risk of PCI than ACI: male gender (OR = 1.392; 95% CI, 1.085-1.786) and diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.667; 95% CI, 1.275-2.180). The same analysis identified 2 factors as conferring greater risk of ACI: atrial fibrillation (OR = .530; 95% CI, .295-.951) and heart valve disease (OR = .433; 95% CI, .203-.922). Frequencies of other possible risk factors were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that PCI and ACI are more similar than different in their etiology and risk factors and that the 2 types of infarction should be treated based more on etiology and risk factors than on their posterior or anterior localization.
BACKGROUND: Many clinicians regard posterior circulation infarction (PCI) as different from anterior circulation infarction (ACI), leading them to apply different treatments. Few studies have validated this practice by directly comparing the etiology and risk factors of PCI and ACI. METHODS: We compared the etiology and risk factors of 2245 consecutive patients with a diagnosis of PCI or ACI confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging in the Chengdu Stroke Registry. Stroke etiology in each patient was classified according to Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) criteria. RESULTS: Our sample included 482 patients (21.5%) with PCI and 1763 (78.5%) with ACI. The most frequent etiology for both infarction types was small-artery occlusion, occurring in 37.6% of patients with PCI and 37.1% of those with ACI. Cardioembolism caused infarction in a significantly smaller proportion of patients with PCI (5.4%) than in patients with ACI (13.3%; odds ratio [OR] = .373; 95% confidence interval [CI], .245-.566). Frequencies of other stroke etiologies were similar between the 2 patient groups. Analysis of risk factor frequencies in the 2 groups showed hypertension to be the most common, occurring in 47.9% of patients in either group. Multivariable analysis identified 2 factors as conferring greater risk of PCI than ACI: male gender (OR = 1.392; 95% CI, 1.085-1.786) and diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.667; 95% CI, 1.275-2.180). The same analysis identified 2 factors as conferring greater risk of ACI: atrial fibrillation (OR = .530; 95% CI, .295-.951) and heart valve disease (OR = .433; 95% CI, .203-.922). Frequencies of other possible risk factors were similar between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that PCI and ACI are more similar than different in their etiology and risk factors and that the 2 types of infarction should be treated based more on etiology and risk factors than on their posterior or anterior localization.
Authors: Petrea Frid; Mattias Drake; A K Giese; J Wasselius; M D Schirmer; K L Donahue; L Cloonan; R Irie; M J R J Bouts; E C McIntosh; S J T Mocking; A V Dalca; R Sridharan; H Xu; E Giralt-Steinhauer; L Holmegaard; K Jood; J Roquer; J W Cole; P F McArdle; J P Broderick; J Jimenez-Conde; C Jern; B M Kissela; D O Kleindorfer; R Lemmens; J F Meschia; T Rundek; R L Sacco; R Schmidt; P Sharma; A Slowik; V Thijs; D Woo; B B Worrall; S J Kittner; B D Mitchell; J Petersson; J Rosand; P Golland; O Wu; N S Rost; A Lindgren Journal: J Neurol Date: 2019-11-11 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: M Berndt; H Poppert; K Steiger; J Pelisek; P Oberdieck; C Maegerlein; C Zimmer; S Wunderlich; B Friedrich; T Boeckh-Behrens; B Ikenberg Journal: Clin Neuroradiol Date: 2020-10-02 Impact factor: 3.649