Tracy E Madsen1, Katie A Baird2, Brian Silver3, Annie Gjelsvik4. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. Electronic address: Tracy_Madsen@brown.edu. 2. Department of Emergency Medicine, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. 3. Department of Neurology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University/ Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, Rhode Island. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The impact of gender on knowledge of stroke warning signs and preparedness is poorly understood, and gender-specific factors associated with poor knowledge of stroke warning signs have not been identified. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 132,604 participants in the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey, a national telephone survey. Adults aged 18 years or older who lived in one of 19 states that administered an optional stroke module asking them to correctly identify stroke symptoms and the correct action to take were included. The primary outcome was a low score (≤ 4 of 7) on the Stroke Symptoms Knowledge Scale (SSKS). Logistic regression was performed for the overall sample and then stratified by gender, with adjustments made for age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, income, and whether respondents had a primary doctor (PMD). Data were weighted as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control. RESULTS: In all, 51.7% of the weighted sample was women. Less women than men had low scores on the SSKS (21% versus 25%, P < .001). After adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, income, and PMD, men had higher odds of having low scores (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.45). After stratifying by gender, Hispanic ethnicity, and age younger than 35 years predicted low scores on the scale in women but not in men. CONCLUSIONS: Female gender is associated with better knowledge of stroke warning signs, but a gender-specific approach identified Hispanic women, young women, and black participants as subgroups at risk for having poor knowledge, suggesting the need for targeted stroke education to increase stroke preparedness in these groups.
BACKGROUND: The impact of gender on knowledge of stroke warning signs and preparedness is poorly understood, and gender-specific factors associated with poor knowledge of stroke warning signs have not been identified. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study of 132,604 participants in the 2009 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System Survey, a national telephone survey. Adults aged 18 years or older who lived in one of 19 states that administered an optional stroke module asking them to correctly identify stroke symptoms and the correct action to take were included. The primary outcome was a low score (≤ 4 of 7) on the Stroke Symptoms Knowledge Scale (SSKS). Logistic regression was performed for the overall sample and then stratified by gender, with adjustments made for age, race, Hispanic ethnicity, income, and whether respondents had a primary doctor (PMD). Data were weighted as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control. RESULTS: In all, 51.7% of the weighted sample was women. Less women than men had low scores on the SSKS (21% versus 25%, P < .001). After adjusting for age, race, ethnicity, income, and PMD, men had higher odds of having low scores (adjusted odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-1.45). After stratifying by gender, Hispanic ethnicity, and age younger than 35 years predicted low scores on the scale in women but not in men. CONCLUSIONS: Female gender is associated with better knowledge of stroke warning signs, but a gender-specific approach identified Hispanic women, young women, and black participants as subgroups at risk for having poor knowledge, suggesting the need for targeted stroke education to increase stroke preparedness in these groups.
Authors: Edward D Siew; Sharidan K Parr; Marcus G Wild; Swee-Ling Levea; Kermaan G Mehta; Ebele M Umeukeje; Samuel A Silver; T Alp Ikizler; Kerri L Cavanaugh Journal: Am J Nephrol Date: 2019-04-17 Impact factor: 3.754
Authors: Scott M Le; Laurel A Copeland; John E Zeber; Jared F Benge; Leigh Allen; Jinmyoung Cho; I-Chia Liao; Jennifer Rasmussen Journal: eNeurologicalSci Date: 2020-10-24
Authors: José M Ramírez-Moreno; Rafael Alonso-González; Diego Peral-Pacheco; María Victoria Millán-Núñez; José J Aguirre-Sánchez Journal: BMC Res Notes Date: 2015-10-24