Literature DB >> 25898855

Women's access to abortion after 20 weeks' gestation for fetal chromosomal abnormalities: Views and experiences of doctors in New South Wales and Queensland.

Kirsten I Black1, Heather Douglas, Caroline de Costa.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Induced abortions after 20 weeks' gestation comprise around one per cent of all terminations in Australia and mostly occur following the diagnosis of a fetal anomaly. However, these abortions are overly represented in legal cases against doctors and challenging to organise in those states where abortion remains in the criminal code and health department directives impose regulations. This study explores barriers to abortion access after 20 weeks' gestation in the states of Queensland and New South Wales.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We approached and sought consent from 22 doctors involved in abortion provision (15 in Queensland and seven in NSW), who responded in depth to a set of clinical scenarios. This study presents participants' responses to three clinical scenarios of women presenting with a fetal chromosomal abnormality after 20 weeks' gestation.
RESULTS: Of the 22 medical practitioners in this study, 18 reported that access to late-term abortion in their state was restricted. The two key factors perceived to affect the decision to terminate a pregnancy in this context were the legal status of abortion and Department of Health policies mandating that applications for abortion be presented to clinical ethics committees. Practitioners reported that committees were slow to convene and inconsistent in their decisions.
CONCLUSIONS: Ethics committee involvement for late-term abortions is required by state health policy in NSW and Queensland, where abortion is still a criminal offence. This process is seen by abortion providers to hinder timely access to services and excludes women from the decision-making process.
© 2015 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical ethics; fetal anomaly; induced abortion

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25898855     DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol        ISSN: 0004-8666            Impact factor:   2.100


  3 in total

Review 1.  The impact of 'grounds' on abortion-related outcomes: a synthesis of legal and health evidence.

Authors:  Fiona de Londras; Amanda Cleeve; Maria I Rodriguez; Antonella F Lavelanet
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.135

2.  Abortion at the edges: Politics, practices, performances.

Authors:  Barbara Baird; Erica Millar
Journal:  Womens Stud Int Forum       Date:  2020-04-28

3.  The prevalence and the reasons of issuing permission for therapeutic abortion in department of forensic medicine, Kermanshah, Iran, during 2005 to 2010.

Authors:  Azam Sharifi; Maryam Janatolmakan; Alireza Khatony
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2019-09-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.