Literature DB >> 2589883

Time trends in peptic ulcer surgery, 1956 to 1986. A nation-wide survey in Sweden.

S Gustavsson1, O Nyrén.   

Abstract

To establish time trends in surgical rates for peptic ulcer disease, all surgical departments in Sweden were requested to complete a questionnaire regarding elective operations for gastric and duodenal ulcers and emergency operations for ulcer perforations performed in 1956, 1966, 1976, and 1986. A total of 8558 operations were reported for these years. The incidence of elective surgery declined steadily, the rates being 72.1, 45.0, 31.9, and 10.7 per 100,000 inhabitants. The male:female ratio fell from 4.2 to 1.5:1, while the duodenal/gastric ulcer ratio remained virtually unchanged. The operation rate for perforation decreased by 50%, from 12.8 to 6.4 per 100,000 inhabitants. We conclude that there has been a dramatic decline in elective peptic ulcer surgery in Sweden that began long before the advent of fiberoptic endoscopy, highly selective vagotomy, or H2-receptor antagonists. The comparable decline in emergency procedures suggests that true changes in the incidence or severity of the disease have occurred. In the future the few patients still needing elective surgery for peptic ulcer may have to be served by a small number of specialized centers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2589883      PMCID: PMC1357860          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-198912000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  24 in total

1.  Effect of cimetidine on surgery for duodenal ulcer.

Authors:  J H Wyllie; C G Clark; J Alexander-Williams; P R Bell; T L Kennedy; R M Kirk; C MacKay
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Surgical treatment of peptic ulcer in the United States. Trends before and after the introduction of cimetidine.

Authors:  H V Fineberg; L A Pearlman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  The complex wane of peptic ulcer. II. Trends in duodenal and gastric ulcer admissions to 790 hospitals, 1974-1979.

Authors:  C M Wylie
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.062

4.  Rising frequency of ulcer perforation in elderly people in the United Kingdom.

Authors:  R Walt; B Katschinski; R Logan; J Ashley; M Langman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-03-01       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  20 years of hospital admissions for peptic ulcer in England and Wales.

Authors:  D Coggon; P Lambert; M J Langman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1981-06-13       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Decline in duodenal ulcer surgery.

Authors:  M P Smith
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1977-03-07       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Cohort and period effects in peptic ulcer mortality from Japan.

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; H Müller
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1984

8.  Changes in the pattern of peptic ulcer disease in the northern part of Norway between 1946 and 1981.

Authors:  H Ostensen; P G Burhol; O Bonnevie; K D Bolz
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.423

9.  Recent changes in the incidence of duodenal and gastric ulcer.

Authors:  T M Vogt; R E Johnson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1980-06       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Gastric and duodenal peptic ulcer disease in a well-defined population. A prospective necropsy study in Malmö, Sweden.

Authors:  C G Lindström
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1978       Impact factor: 2.423

View more
  9 in total

1.  Chromoendoscopic evaluation of gastric mucosa after partial gastrectomy by use of modified endoscopic Congo red test.

Authors:  Ervin Tóth; Kristina Sjölund; Henrik Thorlacius
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2003-05-13       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Changing incidence of peptic ulcer in Germany.

Authors:  S P Mönig; F Brands
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Gastric cancer risk after vagotomy.

Authors:  G Lundegårdh; A Ekbom; J K McLaughlin; O Nyrén
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Assessing the invasiveness of NOTES perforated viscus repair: a comparative study of NOTES and laparoscopy.

Authors:  E A Moran; C J Gostout; A L McConico; J Michalek; M Huebner; Juliane Bingener
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Gastric Ulcer Complications after the Introduction of Proton Pump Inhibitors into Clinical Routine: 20-Year Experience.

Authors:  Friederike Eisner; Diana Hermann; Khaled Bajaeifer; Jörg Glatzle; Alfred Königsrainer; Markus A Küper
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2017-06-16

6.  The prevalence of self-reported peptic ulcer in the United States.

Authors:  A Sonnenberg; J E Everhart
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  Fall in the prevalence of chronic gastritis over 15 years: analysis of outpatient series in Finland from 1977, 1985, and 1992.

Authors:  P Sipponen; T Helske; P Järvinen; H Hyvärinen; K Seppälä; M Siurala
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 23.059

8.  Acute toxicity and gastroprotective role of M. pruriens in ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injuries in rats.

Authors:  Shahram Golbabapour; Maryam Hajrezaie; Pouya Hassandarvish; Nazia Abdul Majid; A Hamid A Hadi; Noraziah Nordin; Mahmood A Abdulla
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 3.411

9.  The history of gastric surgery: the contribution of the Belfast School.

Authors:  Sharon R McConville; Peter F Crookes
Journal:  Ulster Med J       Date:  2007-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.