Yagan Pillay1. 1. Department of General Surgery, Victoria Hospital, Prince Albert Parkland Health Region, Prince Albert S6V8C3, SK, Canada. Electronic address: yagan2pillay@yahoo.ca.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Gallbladder duplication is a rare congenital malformation that occurs in about one in 4000 births. Congenital anomalies of the gallbladder and anatomical variations of their positions are associated with an increased risk of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report the case of a double gallbladder in a fifty-six year old man. He presented with recurrent episodes of biliary colic. Pre-operative imaging confirmed the diagnosis. He subsequently underwent surgery for biliary colic. DISCUSSION: Inspection of the resected gallbladder specimen showed that it consisted of two chambers with a single cystic duct, which communicated through a common ostium. Both chambers had cholelithiasis. There were two cystic arteries as well. Duplication of the gallbladder has an incidence of approximately 1: 4000. However, the exact incidence of this rare anomaly cannot be accurately assessed, since the only cases which have been identified are those that became symptomatic or were encountered as incidental findings during surgery, imaging studies or at autopsy. CONCLUSION: Duplication of the gallbladder is a rare congenital abnormality, which requires special attention to the biliary ductal and arterial anatomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography is the appropriate treatment in a symptomatic gallbladder. The removal of an asymptomatic double gallbladder remains controversial.
INTRODUCTION: Gallbladder duplication is a rare congenital malformation that occurs in about one in 4000 births. Congenital anomalies of the gallbladder and anatomical variations of their positions are associated with an increased risk of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. PRESENTATION OF CASE: We report the case of a double gallbladder in a fifty-six year old man. He presented with recurrent episodes of biliary colic. Pre-operative imaging confirmed the diagnosis. He subsequently underwent surgery for biliary colic. DISCUSSION: Inspection of the resected gallbladder specimen showed that it consisted of two chambers with a single cystic duct, which communicated through a common ostium. Both chambers had cholelithiasis. There were two cystic arteries as well. Duplication of the gallbladder has an incidence of approximately 1: 4000. However, the exact incidence of this rare anomaly cannot be accurately assessed, since the only cases which have been identified are those that became symptomatic or were encountered as incidental findings during surgery, imaging studies or at autopsy. CONCLUSION: Duplication of the gallbladder is a rare congenital abnormality, which requires special attention to the biliary ductal and arterial anatomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography is the appropriate treatment in a symptomatic gallbladder. The removal of an asymptomatic double gallbladder remains controversial.
Gallbladder duplication is a rare congenital malformation, that occurs in about one in 3800–4000 births. Congenital anomalies of the gallbladder and anatomical variations of their positions are associated with an increased risk of complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Preoperative imaging is often helpful for diagnosis. Congenital malformations are considered one of the most important predisposing factors for iatrogenic bile duct injuries during cholecystectomy, especially in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. These malformations could be associated with the development of cholelithiasis, due to inadequate bile drainage. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the treatment of choice. If the intraoperative anatomy is not clear then an intra-operative cholangiogram should be performed.
Case report
A 56 year old male patient was referred for biliary colic and right upper quadrant pain Fig. 1. There was an association with fatty foods. The pain had been there for one week intermittently. There were two previous episodes as well that responded to conservative management in the past year. No history of fever or jaundice. His medical history included type two diabetes. He was on oral hypoglycaemic medication for this condition. There was a history of alcohol ingestion and smoking with a 15 year pack history. Clinically, his abdomen was soft and non tender with no masses and no clinical signs of jaundice. No herniae were noted. Blood results were normal. Ultrasound showed a large gallbladder with no signs of cholecystitis Fig. 2. The differential diagnosis included a double gallbladder or a gallbladder with a larger floppy fundus. Patient then had a CT scan of the abdomen and an MRCP which confirmed the diagnosis. He was booked for a laparoscopic cholecystectomy which was performed without incident. Intraoperatively the cystic duct was clearly identified, so an intraoperative cholangiogram was not performed. The patient had an uneventful recovery and was discharged home on post operative day two. Inspection of the pathology specimen revealed a double gallbladder draining into a common cystic duct. The pathology report revealed a specimen weighing 40.2 g consisting of a double gallbladder Fig. 3. Measurements were 8.0 cm × 3.5 cm and 8.0 cm × 2.5 cm. Both specimens were attached at the proximal part. The mucosa appeared normal. Cholecystectomy specimen showing features of a mild chronic cholecystitis. The macroscopic appearance is in keeping with a double gallbladder. No malignancy was seen Fig. 4.
Fig. 1
MRCP showing double gallbladder(arrows).
Fig. 2
CT scan coronal view with gallbladder duplication(arrows).
Fig. 3
Axial CT showing gallbladder duplication(arrows).
Fig. 4
Duplication Gallbladder.
Discussion
Duplication of the gallbladder has an incidence of approximately 1:4000. However, the exact incidence of this rare anomaly cannot be accurately assessed, since the only cases which can be identified are those that became symptomatic or were encountered as incidental findings during laparotomy, imaging studies or at autopsy. Duplication of the gallbladder can be classified into 2 main types Fig. 5. The first is the bi-lobed gallbladder (Vesica fellea divisum), where a longitudinal septum or invaginating cleft separates the lumen into 2 chambers. In these cases, both gallbladders share a common embryological origin (primordium). The second is the double gallbladder (Vesica fellea du-plex), where there are 2 separate gallbladders with their own cystic ducts. In these cases, we have to accept a double embryological origin (dual primordium). In our case, the gallbladder consisted of 2 separate chambers, which were connected through a narrow ostium. Both chambers shared a common cystic artery but the second chamber appeared to have a second narrow cystic duct, which drained to the right hepatic duct. We believe that the presence of the ostium between the 2 chambers may have led to the progressive obliteration of the draining cystic duct of the second chamber. Differential diagnosis includes gallbladder diverticula, gallbladder fold, Phrygian cap, choledocal cyst, pericholecystic fluid, focal adenomyomatosis, and intraperitoneal fibrous bands Fig. 6. The clinical significance associated with a duplicated gallbladder is similar to those encountered in a single gallbladder. This includes acute or chronic cholecystis, cholelithiasis, empyema, torsion, cholecystocolic fistula, and carcinoma. There are no specific symptoms attributable to a double gallbladder. Simultaneous removal of both gallbladders at surgery is recommended to avoid cholecystis and biliary colic in the remaining organ. Duplication of the gallbladder is a rare congenital abnormality, which requires special attention to the biliary ductal and arterial anatomy. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy with intraoperative cholangiography is the appropriate treatment in a symptomatic gallbladder. The removal of an asymptomatic double gallbladder remains controversial.
Fig. 5
Common cystic duct(arrow).
Fig. 6
Boydens classification.
Conflicts of interest
Not applicable.
Funding
No funding.
Consent
No consent obtained as the patient has demised two years later.
Authors: S Rajapandian; Samrat V Jankar; Darshan S Nayak; Bhushan Chittawadgi; Sandeep C Sabnis; R Sathyamoorthy; R Parthasarathi; P Senthilnathan; P Praveen Raj; C Palanivelu Journal: J Minim Access Surg Date: 2017 Jul-Sep Impact factor: 1.407