| Literature DB >> 25898021 |
Shannon K Flood-Nichols1, Deborah Tinnemore2, Raywin R Huang2, Peter G Napolitano1, Danielle L Ippolito2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Vitamin D deficiency is a common problem in reproductive-aged women in the United States. The effect of vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy is unknown, but has been associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between vitamin D deficiency in the first trimester and subsequent clinical outcomes. STUDYEntities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25898021 PMCID: PMC4405493 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123763
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Frequency of clinical outcomes compared to national and global epidemiology.
| Pregnancy Outcome n (% of 235 total) | Comorbidities | Predicted Population US (%) | Frequencies Global (%) | Madigan 2014 (%) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 176 (75%) | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
| 19 (8%) | 5 preterm deliveries | 3–10% [ | 2–17% [ | 3% |
|
| 10 (4%) | 2 IUGR, 1 GDM | 11.3% [ | 9.6% [ | 9% |
|
| 9 (4%) | -- | 8.6% [ | 3–7% [ | 0.6% |
|
| 5 (2%) | -- | 4.6–9.2% [ | 4.1–27.5% [ | 4% |
|
| 16 (7%) | -- | 8–20% [ | 6% |
IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus.
Demographics of the study population by vitamin D classification.
| Total | Vitamin D Sufficient (>30 ng/ml) | Vitamin D Insufficient (21–29 ng/ml) | Vitamin D Deficient (<20 ng/ml) | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n = 235 (%) | n = 70 (30%) | n = 141 (60%) | n = 24 (10%) | ||
|
| 24.3 ± 4.4 | 24.5 ± 4.2 | 24.6 ± 4.5 | 22.5 ± 3.7 | 0.08 |
|
| 62.2 ± 29.7 | 61.8 ± 13.7 | 62.2 ± 36.9 | 63.0 ± 11.2 | 0.99 |
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| 0.03 | ||||
|
| 183 (77.9) | 57 (81.4) | 114 (80.9) | 12 (50) | |
|
| 16 (6.8) | 3 (4.3) | 10 (7.1) | 3 (12.5) | |
|
| 6 (2.6) | 1 (1.4) | 3 (2.1) | 2 (8.3) | |
|
| 30 (12.8) | 9 (12.9) | 14 (9.9) | 7 (29.2) | |
|
| 0.36 | ||||
|
| 111 (47.2) | 39 (55.7) | 62 (44) | 10 (41.7) | |
|
| 82 (34.9) | 21 (30.0) | 50 (35.5) | 11 (45.8) | |
|
| 42 (17.9) | 10 (14.3) | 29 (20.5) | 3 (12.5) | |
|
| 0.22 | ||||
|
| 89 (37.9) | 22 (31.4) | 61 (43.3) | 6 (25.0) | |
|
| 45 (19.1) | 16 (22.9) | 25 (17.7) | 4 (16.6) | |
|
| 53 (22.6) | 20 (28.6) | 26 (18.4) | 7 (29.2) | |
|
| 48 (20.4) | 12 (17.1) | 29 (20.6) | 7 (29.2) | |
|
| 0.41 | ||||
|
| 155 (66.0) | 47 (67.1) | 95 (67.4) | 13 (54.2) | |
|
| 63 (26.8) | 18 (25.7) | 36 (25.5) | 9 (37.5) | |
|
| 17 (7.2) | 5 (7.1) | 10 (7.1) | 2 (8.3) | |
|
| 0.12 | ||||
|
| 83 (35.3) | 22 (31.4) | 48 (34.0) | 13 (54.2) | |
|
| 152 (64.6) | 48 (68.6) | 93 (66.0) | 11 (45.8) | |
|
| 0.67 | ||||
|
| 15 (6.4) | 3 (4.3) | 10 (7.1) | 2 (8.3) | |
|
| 220 (93.6) | 67 (95.7) | 131 (92.9) | 22 (91.7) |
*Expressed in mean ± standard deviation
**, p value calculated by analysis of variance for continuous variables and chi-square analysis for categorical variables
IUFD, intrauterine fetal demise; SAB, spontaneous abortion.
Plasma vitamin D concentrations in women according to clinical outcome.
| n (% of 235 total) | median vitamin D concentration in ng/ml (range) | |
|---|---|---|
|
| 176 (75) | 27.4 (13.0–71.6) |
|
| 59 (25) | 26.5 (13.2–42.3) |
|
| 19 (8) | 26.5 (16.1–35.9) |
|
| 5 (2) | 27.1 (18.0–33.8) |
|
| 14 (6) | 27.7 (16.1–35.9) |
|
| 10 (4) | 28.4 (19.9–42.3) |
|
| 9 (4) | 27.0 (16.6–38.8) |
|
| 5 (2) | 22.2 (20.5–31.9) |
|
| 16 (7) | 25.1 (13.2–38.8) |
IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus.
Distribution of clinical outcomes in women categorized as Vitamin D deficient, insufficient, or sufficient.
| Vitamin D Category | No Complications n (% of 176) | All Complications n (% of 59) | Preeclampsia n (% of 19) | Spontaneous Preterm delivery n (% of 10) | IUGR n (% of 9) | GDM n (% of 5) | Spontaneous Fetal loss n (% of 16) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 18 (10) | 6 (10) | 2 (11) | 1 (10) | 1 (11) | 0 (0) | 2 (13) |
|
| |||||||
|
| 105 (60) | 36 (61) | 10 (53) | 6 (60) | 7 (78) | 3 (60) | 10 (63) |
|
| |||||||
|
| 53 (30) | 17 (29) | 7 (37) | 3 (30) | 1 (11) | 2 (40) | 4 (25) |
|
|
IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus.
Logistic regression analysis of clinical outcomes in women categorized as vitamin D sufficient compared to vitamin D insufficient or deficient women.
| Vitamin D Sufficient (≥30 ng/ml) | Vitamin D Insufficient or Deficient (<30 ng/ml) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| n (% of 70) | n (% of 165) | Adjusted | |
|
| 53 (75.7) | 123 (74.5) | - |
|
| 17 (24.2) | 42 (25.5) | 1.01 (0.947–1.164) |
|
| 7 (10) | 12 (7.2) | 1.36 (0.48–3.88) |
|
| 3 (4.3) | 7 (4.2) | 0.78 (0.17–3.55) |
|
| 1 (1.4) | 8 (4.8) | 0.33 (0.38–2.83) |
|
| 2 (2.9) | 3 (1.8) | 2.60 (0.28–27.24) |
|
| 4 (5.7) | 12 (7.2) | 0.65 (0.18–2.28) |
*, note: none of the differences were p<0.05 by logistic regression (chi-square analysis)
**, Adjusted for BMI, season, ethnicity, and tobacco use
OR, odds ratio
IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; GDM, gestational diabetes mellitus.
Fig 1Comparison of study parameters in recent vitamin D observational and intervention studies.