Literature DB >> 25897995

Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) produced by Saccharomyces cerevisiae induce alterations in the intracellular pH, membrane permeability and culturability of Hanseniaspora guilliermondii cells.

Patrícia Branco1, Tiago Viana2, Helena Albergaria3, Nils Arneborg4.   

Abstract

Saccharomyces cerevisiae produces antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) during alcoholic fermentation that are active against several wine-related yeasts (e.g. Hanseniaspora guilliermondii) and bacteria (e.g. Oenococcus oeni). In the present study, the physiological changes induced by those AMPs on sensitive H. guilliermondii cells were evaluated in terms of intracellular pH (pHi), membrane permeability and culturability. Membrane permeability was evaluated by staining cells with propidium iodide (PI), pHi was determined by a fluorescence ratio imaging microscopy (FRIM) technique and culturability by a classical plating method. Results showed that the average pHi of H. guilliermondii cells dropped from 6.5 (healthy cells) to 5.4 (damaged cells) after 20 min of exposure to inhibitory concentrations of AMPs, and after 24 h 77.0% of the cells completely lost their pH gradient (∆pH=pHi-pHext). After 24h of exposure to AMPs, PI-stained (dead) cells increased from 0% to 77.7% and the number of viable cells fell from 1×10(5) to 10 CFU/ml. This means that virtually all cells (99.99%) became unculturable but that a sub-population of 22.3% of the cells remained viable (as determined by PI staining). Besides, pHi results showed that after 24h, 23% of the AMP-treated cells were sub-lethally injured (with 0<∆pH<3). Taken together, these results indicated that this subpopulation was under a viable but non-culturable (VBNC) state, which was further confirmed by recuperation assays. In summary, our study reveals that these AMPs compromise the plasma membrane integrity (and possibly also the vacuole membrane) of H. guilliermondii cells, disturbing the pHi homeostasis and inducing a loss of culturability.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antimicrobial peptides; Fluorescence ratio imaging microscopy (FRIM); Intracellular pH (pHi); Membrane integrity; Wine yeasts

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25897995     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.04.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol        ISSN: 0168-1605            Impact factor:   5.277


  12 in total

1.  Crz1p Regulates pH Homeostasis in Candida glabrata by Altering Membrane Lipid Composition.

Authors:  Dongni Yan; Xiaobao Lin; Yanli Qi; Hui Liu; Xiulai Chen; Liming Liu; Jian Chen
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Production and Visualization of Bacterial Spheroplasts and Protoplasts to Characterize Antimicrobial Peptide Localization.

Authors:  Dania M Figueroa; Heidi M Wade; Katrina P Montales; Donald E Elmore; Louise E O Darling
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 3.  Saccharomyces cerevisiae metabolism in ecological context.

Authors:  Paula Jouhten; Olga Ponomarova; Ramon Gonzalez; Kiran R Patil
Journal:  FEMS Yeast Res       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.796

4.  Yeast Monitoring of Wine Mixed or Sequential Fermentations Made by Native Strains from D.O. "Vinos de Madrid" Using Real-Time Quantitative PCR.

Authors:  Margarita García; Braulio Esteve-Zarzoso; Julia Crespo; Juan M Cabellos; Teresa Arroyo
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 5.640

5.  The Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on a Wine Yeast Consortium in Natural and Inoculated Fermentations.

Authors:  Bahareh Bagheri; Florian F Bauer; Mathabatha E Setati
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 5.640

6.  Ecological interactions among Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains: insight into the dominance phenomenon.

Authors:  Roberto Pérez-Torrado; Kalliopi Rantsiou; Benedeta Perrone; Elisabeth Navarro-Tapia; Amparo Querol; Luca Cocolin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Quantifying the Effects of Ethanol and Temperature on the Fitness Advantage of Predominant Saccharomyces cerevisiae Strains Occurring in Spontaneous Wine Fermentations.

Authors:  Donatella Ganucci; Simona Guerrini; Silvia Mangani; Massimo Vincenzini; Lisa Granchi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-07-13       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Yeast Interactions in Inoculated Wine Fermentation.

Authors:  Maurizio Ciani; Angela Capece; Francesca Comitini; Laura Canonico; Gabriella Siesto; Patrizia Romano
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 5.640

9.  The Interaction between Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Non-Saccharomyces Yeast during Alcoholic Fermentation Is Species and Strain Specific.

Authors:  Chunxiao Wang; Albert Mas; Braulio Esteve-Zarzoso
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-13       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 10.  The Genetics of Non-conventional Wine Yeasts: Current Knowledge and Future Challenges.

Authors:  Isabelle Masneuf-Pomarede; Marina Bely; Philippe Marullo; Warren Albertin
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 5.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.