Literature DB >> 25897696

Arsenic bioaccessibility in contaminated soils: Coupling in vitro assays with sequential and HNO3 extraction.

Shi-Wei Li1, Jie Li1, Hong-Bo Li1, Ravi Naidu2, L Q Ma3.   

Abstract

Arsenic bioaccessibility varies with in vitro methods and soils. Four assays including unified BARGE method (UBM), Solubility Bioaccessibility Research Consortium method (SBRC), in vitro gastrointestinal method (IVG), and physiologically based extraction test (PBET), were used to determine As bioaccessibility in 11 contaminated soils (22-4,172 mg kg(-1)). The objective was to understand how bioaccessible As by different methods was related to different As pools based on sequential extraction and 0.43 M HNO3 extraction. Arsenic bioaccessibility was 7.6-25, 2.3-49, 7.3-44, and 1.3-38% in gastric phase (GP), and 5.7-53, 0.46-33, 2.3-42, and 0.86-43% in intestinal phase (IP) for UBM, SBRC, IVG, and PBET, respectively, with HNO3-extractable As being 0.90-60%. Based on sequential extraction, As was primarily associated with amorphous (AF3; 17-79%) and crystallized Fe/Al oxides (CF4; 6.4-73%) while non-specifically sorbed (NS1), specifically sorbed (SS2), and residual fractions (RS5) were 0-10%, 3.4-20% and 3.2-25%. Significant correlation was found between As bioaccessibility by PBET and NS1+SS2 (R(2) = 0.55-0.69), and UBM-GP and NS1 + SS2 + AF3 (R(2) = 0.58), indicating PBET mostly targeted As in NS1+SS2 whereas UBM in NS1 + SS2 + AF3. HNO3-extractable As was correlated to bioaccessible As by four methods (R(2) = 0.42-0.72) with SBRC-GP having the best correlation. The fact that different methods targeted different As fractions in soils suggested the importance of validation by animal test. Our data suggested that HNO3 may have potential to determine bioaccessible As in soils. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Arsenic; Bioaccessibility; Contaminated soil; HNO(3) extraction; Sequence extraction

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25897696     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hazard Mater        ISSN: 0304-3894            Impact factor:   10.588


  4 in total

1.  A comparative study on arsenic fractions in indoor/outdoor particulate matters: a case in Baoding, China.

Authors:  Kai-Qiang He; Chun-Gang Yuan; Lian-Qing Yin; Ke-Gang Zhang; Pei-Yao Xu; Jiao-Jiao Xie; Yi-Wen Shen
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Application of chemical and biological tests for estimation of current state of a tailing dump and surrounding soil from the region of Tarniţa, Suceava, Romania.

Authors:  Darya M Ilieva; Maria Argirova; Lyudmila Y Angelova; Robert Vasile Gradinaru; Gabi Drochioiu; Andriana R Surleva
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2019-11-20       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 3.  In vivo and in vitro methods for evaluating soil arsenic bioavailability: relevant to human health risk assessment.

Authors:  Karen D Bradham; Gary L Diamond; Michele Burgess; Albert Juhasz; Julie M Klotzbach; Mark Maddaloni; Clay Nelson; Kirk Scheckel; Sophia M Serda; Marc Stifelman; David J Thomas
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 8.071

4.  Bioaccessible arsenic in soil of thermal areas of Viterbo, Central Italy: implications for human health risk.

Authors:  V Rimondi; P Costagliola; P Lattanzi; T Catelani; S Fornasaro; D Medas; G Morelli; M Paolieri
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 4.609

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.