Literature DB >> 25897472

Thyroid Biopsy Specialists: A Quality Initiative to Reduce Wait Times and Improve Adequacy Rates.

Sangeet Ghai1, Stefanie Y Lee1, Patrice M Bret1, Ravi J Menezes1, Scott L Boerner1, Yongheng Jia1, Kulsoom A Maan1, Rudolf Boci1, Wasim Javed1, Mostafa Atri1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To develop and implement a program where selected sonographers would be trained to perform thyroid biopsies independently under the supervision of a radiologist, with the goal of improving efficiency and quality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional research ethics board approval was obtained for this retrospective study, with waiver of informed consent. After approval from the relevant regulatory bodies, four sonographers successfully completed a training program and began to perform all thyroid biopsies (with informed consent) in a room adjacent to the main radiologist-run biopsy room, where the radiologist was available for backup as needed. In the preimplementation period (January 2010 to April 2011), 1321 nodules were biopsied, 29 of which included on-site cytopathology assessment. In the postimplementation period (August 2011 to July 2012), 1347 nodules were biopsied, 103 of which underwent on-site cytopathology assessment. Wait times and adequacy rates were calculated for both periods.
RESULTS: Patient wait times decreased from a mean of 80-90 days before implementation of the thyroid biopsy specialist program to 20-30 days afterward. The percentage of adequate samples improved from 74.6% (985 of 1321 nodules) to 78.6% (1059 of 1347 nodules), with a P value of .015 (74.1% [957 of 1292 nodules] to 77.5% [964 of 1244 nodules] when excluding nodules with on-site cytopathology assessment, P = .0497). The percentage of malignant samples showed no significant change in the two time periods, 5.1% (68 of 1321 nodules) before implementation of the program versus 5.4% (73 of 1347 nodules) after implementation, P = .823 (5.1% [66 of 1292 nodules] vs 5.3% [66 of 1244 nodules] in the respective time periods when excluding nodules with on-site cytopathology assessment, P = .888). No major procedural complications occurred.
CONCLUSION: Sonographers can be successfully trained to perform ultrasonography-guided thyroid biopsies safely under the supervision of a radiologist, which can improve wait times and adequacy rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25897472     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2015140620

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  4 in total

1.  Incidental detection, imaging modalities and temporal trends of differentiated thyroid cancer in Ontario: a population-based retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Todd A Norwood; Emmalin Buajitti; Lorraine L Lipscombe; Thérèse A Stukel; Laura C Rosella
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-11-02

2.  Diagnostic performance of 2015 American Thyroid Association guidelines and inter-observer variability in assigning risk category.

Authors:  Zhiyu Pang; Myles Margolis; Ravi J Menezes; Hassaan Maan; Sangeet Ghai
Journal:  Eur J Radiol Open       Date:  2019-03-27

3.  Scientific Publications on Thyroid Ultrasound between 2001 and 2020: Differences in Research Characteristics by Disciplines.

Authors:  Won Chul Shin; Chae Woon Lee; Jiyeon Ha; Kyoung Ja Lim; Young Lan Seo; Eun Joo Yun; Dae Young Yoon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 7.109

4.  What Do Patients Think About Their Radiation Oncologists? An Assessment of Online Patient Reviews on Healthgrades.

Authors:  Arpan V Prabhu; Simrath Randhawa; David Clump; Dwight E Heron; Sushil Beriwal
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-02-06
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.