| Literature DB >> 25897377 |
Gamuchirai Chakona1, Ernst R Swartz2, Albert Chakona2.
Abstract
Range expansion of obligate freshwater fishes in the Cape Floristic Region (CFR) of South Africa has mostly been attributed to river capture events and confluence of rivers following sea-level regression. The role of low drainage divides and interbasin water transfers has received less attention. This study analyzed mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences to assess the processes that could have influenced the phylogeographic patterns of a newly discovered lineage of Galaxias zebratus (hereafter Galaxias zebratus "Joubertina") that occurs across two currently isolated river systems close to the Joubertina area in the eastern CFR. Results from both analyses revealed that observed genetic differentiation cannot be explained by isolation between the two river systems. No genetic differentiation was found between the Krom River system and a population from one of the Gamtoos tributaries. Shallow genetic differentiation was found between the Krom and the other Gamtoos populations. Historical river capture events and sea-level changes do not explain the present distribution of Galaxias zebratus "Joubertina" across the Krom and Gamtoos River systems. Interbasin dispersal during pluvial periods, recent river capture, or recent human-mediated translocation seems to be the most plausible explanations.Entities:
Keywords: Cape Floristic Region; Galaxias; interbasin dispersal; mitochondrial DNA; nuclear DNA; phylogeography
Year: 2015 PMID: 25897377 PMCID: PMC4395167 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.1409
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
Figure 1Five mechanisms could have influenced the evolutionary history of the Galaxias zebratus “Joubertina” in the Krom and Gamtoos River systems: (A) an ancient Krom-Kouga river capture occurred (Ancient River Capture Hypothesis), (B) confluence of the Krom and Gamtoos river systems during the last glacial maximum (Palaeoriver Hypothesis), (C) low drainage divide that could have been inundated during periods of heavy rainfall (Intermittent Connections Hypothesis), (D) Recent River Capture Hypothesis, and (E) man-made canals between the Gamtoos and Krom River systems (Interbasin Transfer Hypothesis).
Figure 2Maps showing the study area (A), sampling sites that were visited to map the distribution of Galaxias zebratus “Joubertina” (B) and the present distribution of Galaxias zebratus “Joubertina” in the Krom and Gamtoos River systems (C). Arrows in map C indicate the direction of flow.
The geographic distribution of mitochondrial cytochrome b alleles. Sample sizes (n) used in this study and haplotype diversity (HD) are given at the bottom of the table.
| Haplotype | Krom | Twee | Diepkloof | Wabooms | Granaat | Krakeel |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mitochondrial cytochrome | ||||||
| 1 | 20 | 20 | ||||
| 2 | 20 | 11 | 8 | 1 | ||
| 3 | 8 | |||||
| 4 | 7 | |||||
| 5 | 1 | |||||
| 6 | 6 | 14 | ||||
| 7 | 5 | |||||
| | 20 | 20 | 20 | 20 | 21 | 20 |
| | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.563 | 0.695 | 0.468 |
| Nuclear S7 diversity | ||||||
| 1 | 13 | 14 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 2 |
| 2 | 1 | |||||
| 3 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 10 | ||
| 4 | 2 | |||||
| 5 | 2 | |||||
| | 14 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 10 | 12 |
| | 0.143 | 0.233 | 0.750 | 0.545 | 0. 356 | 0.468 |
Mitochondrial cytochrome b pairwise ФST, nucleotide diversity (π), and gene diversity (δ) values (below diagonal) and nuclear S7 pairwise ФST, nucleotide diversity (π), and gene diversity (δ) values (above diagonal) for Galaxias zebratus “Joubertina” populations. All pairwise ФST comparisons were statistically significant (P < 0.05), except for the comparison between the Krom and the Twee. Nucleotide diversity (π) and gene diversity (δ) values did not differ significantly among the populations.
| Population | Krom | Twee | Diepkloof | Wabooms | Granaat | Krakeel | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Krom | 0.042NS | 0.416 | 0.082 | 0.398 | 0.754 | 0.000 | 0.143 | |
| Twee | 0NS | 0.401 | 0.094 | 0.377 | 0.720 | 0.001 | 0.233 | |
| Diepkloof | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.200 | −0.006 | 0.050 | 0.002 | 0.750 | |
| Wabooms | 0.641 | 0.641 | 0.354 | 0.099 | 0.530 | 0.001 | 0.356 | |
| Granaat | 0.645 | 0.645 | 0.260 | 0.318 | 0.152 | 0.001 | 0.546 | |
| Krakeel | 0.906 | 0.906 | 0.862 | 0.675 | 0.511 | 0.001 | 0.303 | |
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.003 | 0.002 | 0.001 | |||
| 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.563 | 0.695 | 0.468 |
NS, not significant.
Figure 3TCS haplotype networks for mtDNA cytochrome b (top) and nuclear S7 (bottom) for Galaxias zebratus “Joubertina” collected from the Krom and Gamtoos River systems in the Cape Floristic Region, South Africa. Colors correspond to localities where lineages were collected.
AMOVA analysis of the distribution of mitochondrial cytochrome b genetic variation for populations of Galaxias zebratus “Joubertina” based on drainage structure (tributaries, catchments, river systems, and Krom and Twee vs western Kouga tributaries), showing F-statistics (P < 0.05) and percentage variation in brackets.
| Source of variation | Six tributaries | Four catchments | Two systems | Twee-Krom vs. W. Kouga |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups | 0.653 (65.3%) | 0.491 (49.1%) | −0.005 (−0.5%) | 0.393 (39.3%) |
| Among populations within groups | 0.347 (12.0%) | 0.444 (22.6%) | 0.686 (68.9%) | 0.577 (35.1%) |
| Within populations | 0.773 (22.7%) | 0.717 (28.3%) | 0.684 (31.6%) | 0.743 (25.7%) |
| Overall | 0.947 | 1.060 | 0.951 | 1.170 |
AMOVA analyses for the distribution of nuclear S7 genetic variation for populations of Galaxias zebratus “Joubertina” based on drainage structure (tributaries, catchments, river systems and Krom and Twee vs western Kouga tributaries), showing F-statistics and percentage variation in brackets.
| Source of variation | Six tributaries | Four catchments | Two systems | Twee-Krom vs. W. Kouga |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Among groups | 0.305 (30.5%) | 0.280 (28.0%) | 0.000 (0.01%) | 0.362 (36.2%) |
| Among populations within groups | 0.378 (26.3%) | 0.194 (14.0%) | 0.396 (39.6%) | 0.486 (12.4%) |
| Within populations | 0.568 (43.2%) | 0.419 (58.1%) | 0.396 (60.4%) | 0.194 (51.4%) |
| Overall | 0.310 | 0.322 | 0.310 | 0.364 |
All values were statistically significant.