Literature DB >> 25897366

The public health importance of antenatal care.

.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antenatal care; EBCOG; position Paper; public health

Year:  2015        PMID: 25897366      PMCID: PMC4402443     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn        ISSN: 2032-0418


× No keyword cloud information.
The health of future generations is to a great extent determined by the baby’s growth and development within the womb. The success of fetal life determines not only the health of the newborn, but also has a major impact on adult health and disease risk. Good perinatal health is therefore important to individuals, to society and to future generations (Barker et al., 2013). The purpose of this EBCOG Position Paper is to underline the public health importance of free, unhindered access to antenatal care, and to emphasize the role of the obstetrician in continuously improving services that meet this need. Large disparities exist in perinatal health, not only between countries, but also within cities and population groups (de Graaf et al., 2013). Most problems at birth are caused by prematurity, fetal growth restriction, congenital abnormalities or asphyxia. With access to antenatal care, especially in early pregnancy, many of these can be prevented or anticipated. Particularly relevant in this respect are modifiable life-style risks such as smoking, alcohol consumption, drug abuse, obesity, malnutrition, inadequate folic acid intake and occupational exposures. Perinatal mortality and morbidity can be up to three times higher in some socially deprived districts, while the effects of poverty on perinatal health are not limited to immigrant groups. The accumulation of non-medical risks, particularly social and mental problems, as well as inadequate access to appropriate care, are all contributory (Fraser, 2013). Current antenatal care which focuses mainly on medical risks, needs to evolve to include non-medical factors and to reach out to all parts of the community. There is a need for greater awareness among healthcare professionals of the personal and community life of pregnant women, including social deprivation and domestic violence. Services need to be multiprofessional so they can address both medical and social issues. Clinics should not only be able to cope with complicated obstetrical issues, including chronic disease (obesity, hypertension, diabetes, infections), but also social, psychiatric and addiction problems. In particular, care needs to reach women who would not otherwise make use of the available services. EBCOG considers that it is the public health responsibility of obstetricians, together with midwives, nurses and general practitioners, to organize appropriate care for vulnerable groups. This can only become effective when antenatal care is linked with local public health initiatives, including social services and youth care, which address lifestyle and social issues. This approach is challenging, but the benefits are considerable (Denktas et al., 2014). Furthermore because the initial phases of pregnancy have a large impact on perinatal and subsequent adult health, optimal care needs to be initiated before pregnancy. The promotion of preconception health will not only improve women’s general health but has a favourable effect on the health of the next generation. Preconception care may require a change of mind set both for healthcare professionals and also for women, their partners and their families, but again the benefits to society could be great (Temel et al., 2014). Thus EBCOG believes that recognition of the public health importance of pregnancy-related care is essential to improve the health of current and future generations, and that this care will also diminish the adverse effects of poverty in vulnerable communities. Local and national governments have a responsibility to recognise this public health need and to consider the costs and benefits of free access to both antenatal and preconception care.
  5 in total

1.  Bringing it all together: effective maternal and child health practice as a means to improve public health.

Authors:  Michael R Fraser
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2013-07

Review 2.  Evidence-based preconceptional lifestyle interventions.

Authors:  Sevilay Temel; Sabine F van Voorst; Brian W Jack; Semiha Denktaş; Eric A P Steegers
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 3.  Inequalities in perinatal and maternal health.

Authors:  Johanna P de Graaf; Eric A P Steegers; Gouke J Bonsel
Journal:  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.927

4.  Developmental biology: Support mothers to secure future public health.

Authors:  David Barker; Mary Barker; Tom Fleming; Michelle Lampl
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Design and outline of the Healthy Pregnancy 4 All study.

Authors:  Semiha Denktaş; Jashvant Poeran; Sabine F van Voorst; Amber A Vos; Lieke C de Jong-Potjer; Adja J M Waelput; Erwin Birnie; Gouke J Bonsel; Eric A P Steegers
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total
  25 in total

1.  The feasibility of multimodality remote monitoring of maternal physiology during pregnancy.

Authors:  Agata P Zielinska; Edward Mullins; Christoph Lees
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-07-01       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Giving birth in rural Arctic Greenland results from an Eastern Greenlandic birth cohort.

Authors:  Susanne Houd; Hans Christian Florian Sørensen; Jette Aaroe Clausen; Rikke Damkjær Maimburg
Journal:  Int J Circumpolar Health       Date:  2022-12       Impact factor: 1.941

3.  Magnitude of birth asphyxia and its associated factors among live birth in north Central Ethiopia 2021: an institutional-based cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Nigusie Selomon Tibebu; Tigabu Desie Emiru; Chalie Marew Tiruneh; Bisrat Dessie Getu; Moges Wubneh Abate; Adane Birhanu Nigat; Berihun Bantie; Getasew Legas; Belete Gelaw Walle; Mulualem Gete Feleke; Endalk Birrie
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 2.567

4.  The moderating role of partners' education on early antenatal care in northern Ghana.

Authors:  Paschal Awingura Apanga; Maxwell Tii Kumbeni; James Kotuah Sakeah; Ayokunle A Olagoke; Olufemi Ajumobi
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2022-05-05       Impact factor: 3.105

5.  Predictors of prenatal care satisfaction among pregnant women in American Samoa.

Authors:  Oluwaseyi Adeyinka; Anne Marie Jukic; Stephen T McGarvey; Bethel T Muasau-Howard; Mata'uitafa Faiai; Nicola L Hawley
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 3.007

6.  Barriers and associated factors for adequate antenatal care among Afghan women in Iran; findings from a community-based survey.

Authors:  Omid Dadras; Fateme Dadras; Ziba Taghizade; Seyedahmad Seyedalinaghi; Masako Ono-Kihara; Masahiro Kihara; Takeo Nakayama
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  The Frequency and Content of Prenatal Care Determine Birth Place: A Community Based Case-Control Study.

Authors:  Can Oner; Binali Catak
Journal:  Iran J Public Health       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 1.429

8.  Institutional delivery and associated factors in rural communities of Central Gondar Zone, Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Adane Nigusie; Telake Azale; Mezgebu Yitayal; Lemma Derseh
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Early antenatal care visit: a systematic analysis of regional and global levels and trends of coverage from 1990 to 2013.

Authors:  Ann-Beth Moller; Max Petzold; Doris Chou; Lale Say
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 26.763

10.  Antenatal care in rural Bangladesh: Gaps in adequate coverage and content.

Authors:  Abu Bakkar Siddique; Janet Perkins; Tapas Mazumder; Mohammad Rifat Haider; Goutom Banik; Tazeen Tahsina; Md Jahurul Islam; Shams El Arifeen; Ahmed Ehsanur Rahman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.