BACKGROUND: Trebananib is an anti-angiogenic peptibody under investigation in patients with advanced cancer. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interaction of paclitaxel and trebananib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors received weekly 80 mg/m(2) intravenous (IV) paclitaxel (3 weeks on/1 week off) with weekly 15 mg/kg IV trebananib starting at Week 2. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at Week 1 (paclitaxel alone), Week 6 (paclitaxel and trebananib), and Week 8 (trebananib alone). An absence of interaction was to be concluded if the 90 % confidence intervals (CI) for the differences in paclitaxel exposure fell within the 0.80-1.25 interval. RESULTS: The primary study was conducted between 7/2012 and 10/2013. Thirty-five patients were enrolled and 34 received both treatments. Most patients were white (91 %) and female (59 %); mean age was 61 years. The most common tumor types were ovarian (32 %) and bladder (27 %), 71 % of patients had stage IV disease, and all had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores of 0 or 1. PK parameter analysis was done on patients with evaluable PK data at both assessments (with and without concomitant therapy; n = 28). The geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratio (90 % CI) of paclitaxel AUCinf with and without trebananib was 1.17 (1.10, 1.25). The GLSM ratio (90 % CI) of trebananib AUCtau,ss with and without paclitaxel was 0.92 (0.87, 0.97). The most common adverse events were fatigue, local edema, peripheral edema, and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed no evidence of clinically meaningful PK interaction between paclitaxel and trebananib.
BACKGROUND: Trebananib is an anti-angiogenic peptibody under investigation in patients with advanced cancer. This study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) drug-drug interaction of paclitaxel and trebananib. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid tumors received weekly 80 mg/m(2) intravenous (IV) paclitaxel (3 weeks on/1 week off) with weekly 15 mg/kg IV trebananib starting at Week 2. Blood samples for PK analysis were collected at Week 1 (paclitaxel alone), Week 6 (paclitaxel and trebananib), and Week 8 (trebananib alone). An absence of interaction was to be concluded if the 90 % confidence intervals (CI) for the differences in paclitaxel exposure fell within the 0.80-1.25 interval. RESULTS: The primary study was conducted between 7/2012 and 10/2013. Thirty-five patients were enrolled and 34 received both treatments. Most patients were white (91 %) and female (59 %); mean age was 61 years. The most common tumor types were ovarian (32 %) and bladder (27 %), 71 % of patients had stage IV disease, and all had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores of 0 or 1. PK parameter analysis was done on patients with evaluable PK data at both assessments (with and without concomitant therapy; n = 28). The geometric least squares mean (GLSM) ratio (90 % CI) of paclitaxel AUCinf with and without trebananib was 1.17 (1.10, 1.25). The GLSM ratio (90 % CI) of trebananib AUCtau,ss with and without paclitaxel was 0.92 (0.87, 0.97). The most common adverse events were fatigue, local edema, peripheral edema, and nausea. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed no evidence of clinically meaningful PK interaction between paclitaxel and trebananib.
Authors: Jian-Feng Lu; Erik Rasmussen; Beth Y Karlan; Ignace B Vergote; Lynn Navale; Mita Kuchimanchi; Rebeca Melara; Daniel E Stepan; David M Weinreich; Yu-Nien Sun Journal: Cancer Chemother Pharmacol Date: 2012-01-01 Impact factor: 3.333
Authors: Beth Y Karlan; Amit M Oza; Gary E Richardson; Diane M Provencher; Vincent L Hansen; Martin Buck; Setsuko K Chambers; Prafull Ghatage; Charles H Pippitt; John V Brown; Allan Covens; Raj V Nagarkar; Margaret Davy; Charles A Leath; Hoa Nguyen; Daniel E Stepan; David M Weinreich; Marjan Tassoudji; Yu-Nien Sun; Ignace B Vergote Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-12-19 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Angela Coxon; James Bready; Hosung Min; Stephen Kaufman; Juan Leal; Dongyin Yu; Tani Ann Lee; Ji-Rong Sun; Juan Estrada; Brad Bolon; James McCabe; Ling Wang; Karen Rex; Sean Caenepeel; Paul Hughes; David Cordover; Haejin Kim; Seog Joon Han; Mark L Michaels; Eric Hsu; Grant Shimamoto; Russell Cattley; Eunju Hurh; Linh Nguyen; Shao Xiong Wang; Anthony Ndifor; Isaac J Hayward; Beverly L Falcón; Donald M McDonald; Luke Li; Tom Boone; Richard Kendall; Robert Radinsky; Jonathan D Oliner Journal: Mol Cancer Ther Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 6.261
Authors: Brian Rini; Cezary Szczylik; Nizar M Tannir; Piotr Koralewski; Piotr Tomczak; Andrzej Deptala; Luc Y Dirix; Mayer Fishman; Rodryg Ramlau; Alain Ravaud; Wojciech Rogowski; Karolyn Kracht; Yu-Nien Sun; Michael B Bass; Markus Puhlmann; Bernard Escudier Journal: Cancer Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Neena I Marupudi; James E Han; Khan W Li; Violette M Renard; Betty M Tyler; Henry Brem Journal: Expert Opin Drug Saf Date: 2007-09 Impact factor: 4.250
Authors: Roy S Herbst; David Hong; Linnea Chap; Razelle Kurzrock; Edward Jackson; Jeffrey M Silverman; Erik Rasmussen; Yu-Nien Sun; Don Zhong; Yuying C Hwang; Jeffrey L Evelhoch; Jonathan D Oliner; Ngocdiep Le; Lee S Rosen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2009-06-22 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Benjamin Wu; Jessica Johnson; Marcus Soto; Manuel Ponce; Dominador Calamba; Yu-Nien Sun Journal: Pharm Res Date: 2011-12-22 Impact factor: 4.200
Authors: Sarah E S Leary; Julie R Park; Joel M Reid; Andrew T Ralya; Sylvain Baruchel; Bing Wu; Timothy P L Roberts; Xiaowei Liu; Charles G Minard; Elizabeth Fox; Brenda Weigel; Susan Blaney Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2017-07-27 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Swati Shrestha; Jia Shen; Paulina Giacomelli; Michelle A Scott; Chia Soo; Kang Ting; Bruno Péault; Sarah M Dry; Aaron W James Journal: J Orthop Date: 2016-11-28
Authors: Roberto Carmagnani Pestana; Manal M Hassan; Reham Abdel-Wahab; Yehia I Abugabal; Lauren M Girard; Donghui Li; Ping Chang; Kanwal Raghav; Jeff Morris; Robert A Wolff; Asif Rashid; Hesham M Amin; Ahmed Kaseb Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2018-12-28