Rong Chen1, Qing Qian1, Meng-Ru Sun1, Chun-Yan Qian1, Su-Lan Zou1, Ming-Li Wang2, Li-Ying Wang1. 1. Department of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiang Su, China. 2. Department of Pharmacy, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiang Su, China. wangminglicz@hotmail.com.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The study was to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of piperacillin (PIP) and tazobactam (TAZ) that explain pharmacokinetic variability and to propose optimized dosage regimens in patients with nosocomial infections. METHODS: In total, 310 PIP and 280 TAZ concentration-time points were collected at steady state over multiple dosing intervals from 50 patients who received PIP/TAZ infused within 30 min or over 3 h. Drug analysis was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Nonlinear mixed effects modeling was employed to develop PPK model and 1000 Monte Carlo simulation was used to predict the probability of target attainment (PTA) with a target time of non-protein-bound concentration above MIC > 50 % of the dosing interval. RESULTS: A model with one-compartment model had the best predictive performance for the PPK model. The population estimates of PIP were 13.8 L/h (31.1 %) for clearance (CL) and 21.7 L (38 %) for volume of distribution (V). The population estimates of TAZ were 9.3 L/h (29.1 %) for CL and 16 L (35.3 %) for V. Influence of creatinine clearance (CLcr) and body weight were identified as important covariates for PIP/TAZ CL and V, respectively. A 30-min infusion of 4 g every 6 h achieved robust (≥90 %) PTAs for MIC ≤ 16 mg/L. As an alternative mode of administration, a 3-h infusion of 4 g every 6 h achieved robust PTAs for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged infusions achieved better PTAs compared with shorter infusions at similar daily doses. This benefit was most pronounced for MICs between 16 and 40 mg/L.
OBJECTIVE: The study was to establish a population pharmacokinetic (PPK) model of piperacillin (PIP) and tazobactam (TAZ) that explain pharmacokinetic variability and to propose optimized dosage regimens in patients with nosocomial infections. METHODS: In total, 310 PIP and 280 TAZ concentration-time points were collected at steady state over multiple dosing intervals from 50 patients who received PIP/TAZ infused within 30 min or over 3 h. Drug analysis was performed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Nonlinear mixed effects modeling was employed to develop PPK model and 1000 Monte Carlo simulation was used to predict the probability of target attainment (PTA) with a target time of non-protein-bound concentration above MIC > 50 % of the dosing interval. RESULTS: A model with one-compartment model had the best predictive performance for the PPK model. The population estimates of PIP were 13.8 L/h (31.1 %) for clearance (CL) and 21.7 L (38 %) for volume of distribution (V). The population estimates of TAZ were 9.3 L/h (29.1 %) for CL and 16 L (35.3 %) for V. Influence of creatinine clearance (CLcr) and body weight were identified as important covariates for PIP/TAZ CL and V, respectively. A 30-min infusion of 4 g every 6 h achieved robust (≥90 %) PTAs for MIC ≤ 16 mg/L. As an alternative mode of administration, a 3-h infusion of 4 g every 6 h achieved robust PTAs for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella pneumoniae. CONCLUSIONS: Prolonged infusions achieved better PTAs compared with shorter infusions at similar daily doses. This benefit was most pronounced for MICs between 16 and 40 mg/L.
Authors: Seth R Bauer; Charbel Salem; Michael J Connor; Joseph Groszek; Maria E Taylor; Peilin Wei; Ashita J Tolwani; William H Fissell Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2012-01-26 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Jill M Butterfield; Thomas P Lodise; Scott Beegle; Jonathan Rosen; Joshua Farkas; Manjunath P Pai Journal: J Antimicrob Chemother Date: 2013-07-18 Impact factor: 5.790
Authors: Katherine M Shea; S Christian Cheatham; Matthew F Wack; David W Smith; Kevin M Sowinski; Michael B Kays Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2009-09-01 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Hui Wang; Bo Zhang; Yuxing Ni; Joseph L Kuti; Baiyi Chen; Minjun Chen; David P Nicolau Journal: Int J Antimicrob Agents Date: 2007-07-23 Impact factor: 5.283
Authors: Fekade Bruck Sime; Uwe Hahn; Morgyn S Warner; Ing Soo Tiong; Michael S Roberts; Jeffrey Lipman; Sandra L Peake; Jason A Roberts Journal: Antimicrob Agents Chemother Date: 2017-10-24 Impact factor: 5.191
Authors: Dagan O Lonsdale; Emma H Baker; Karin Kipper; Charlotte Barker; Barbara Philips; Andrew Rhodes; Mike Sharland; Joseph F Standing Journal: Br J Clin Pharmacol Date: 2018-11-26 Impact factor: 4.335
Authors: Cristina Sanches; Geisa C S Alves; Andras Farkas; Samuel Dutra da Silva; Whocely Victor de Castro; Farah Maria Drummond Chequer; Francisco Beraldi-Magalhães; Igor Rafael Dos Santos Magalhães; André de Oliveira Baldoni; Mark D Chatfield; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Suzanne L Parker Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) Date: 2022-03-24