Literature DB >> 2589330

Outcome of pregnancy in women engaged in laboratory work at a petrochemical plant.

G Axelsson1, R Rylander.   

Abstract

The aim of the investigation was to study whether laboratory work or other types of chemical work at one petrochemical plant were associated with an increased risk for miscarriage or reduced birthweight. The study was based on questionnaire data for 95% of the women working at the plant between 1973 and 1987. A statistically significant difference between observed and expected number of miscarriages (p less than 0.05) was seen during the period 1970-1974 among women working in one of the laboratories during the first trimester. No suspicions could be raised against any specific chemical as a cause of the unsuccessful pregnancies. The results do not indicate the presence of an increased risk today.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2589330     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700160507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  4 in total

1.  Laboratory work and pregnancy outcomes: a study within the National Birth Cohort in Denmark.

Authors:  J L Zhu; L E Knudsen; A-M N Andersen; N H Hjollund; J Olsen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.402

2.  Association of petrochemical exposure with spontaneous abortion.

Authors:  X Xu; S I Cho; M Sammel; L You; S Cui; Y Huang; G Ma; C Padungtod; L Pothier; T Niu; D Christiani; T Smith; L Ryan; L Wang
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 3.  Systematic review of the association between oil and natural gas extraction processes and human reproduction.

Authors:  Victoria D Balise; Chun-Xia Meng; Jennifer N Cornelius-Green; Christopher D Kassotis; Rana Kennedy; Susan C Nagel
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 7.329

Review 4.  Association between coffee or caffeine consumption and fecundity and fertility: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.

Authors:  Julie Lyngsø; Cecilia Høst Ramlau-Hansen; Bjørn Bay; Hans Jakob Ingerslev; Adam Hulman; Ulrik Schiøler Kesmodel
Journal:  Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 4.790

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.