BACKGROUND: Correcting for the potential effects of population stratification is an important issue in genome wide association studies (GWAS) of complex traits. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the genetic structure of the population under study with subsequent incorporation of the first several principal components (PCs) in the GWAS regression model is often used for this purpose. PROBLEM: For longevity related traits such a correction may negatively affect the accuracy of genetic analyses. This is because PCs may capture genetic structure induced by mortality selection processes in genetically heterogeneous populations. DATA AND METHODS: We used the Framingham Heart Study data on life span and on individual genetic background to construct two sets of PCs. One was constructed to separate population stratification due to differences in ancestry from that induced by mortality selection. The other was constructed using genetic data on individuals of different ages without attempting to separate the ancestry effects from the mortality selection effects. The GWASs of human life span were performed using the first 20 PCs from each of the selected sets to control for possible population stratification. RESULTS: The results indicated that the GWAS that used the PC set separating population stratification induced by mortality selection from differences in ancestry produced stronger genetic signals than the GWAS that used PCs without such separation. CONCLUSION: The quality of genetic estimates in GWAS can be improved when changes in genetic structure caused by mortality selection are taken into account in controlling for possible effects of population stratification.
BACKGROUND: Correcting for the potential effects of population stratification is an important issue in genome wide association studies (GWAS) of complex traits. Principal component analysis (PCA) of the genetic structure of the population under study with subsequent incorporation of the first several principal components (PCs) in the GWAS regression model is often used for this purpose. PROBLEM: For longevity related traits such a correction may negatively affect the accuracy of genetic analyses. This is because PCs may capture genetic structure induced by mortality selection processes in genetically heterogeneous populations. DATA AND METHODS: We used the Framingham Heart Study data on life span and on individual genetic background to construct two sets of PCs. One was constructed to separate population stratification due to differences in ancestry from that induced by mortality selection. The other was constructed using genetic data on individuals of different ages without attempting to separate the ancestry effects from the mortality selection effects. The GWASs of human life span were performed using the first 20 PCs from each of the selected sets to control for possible population stratification. RESULTS: The results indicated that the GWAS that used the PC set separating population stratification induced by mortality selection from differences in ancestry produced stronger genetic signals than the GWAS that used PCs without such separation. CONCLUSION: The quality of genetic estimates in GWAS can be improved when changes in genetic structure caused by mortality selection are taken into account in controlling for possible effects of population stratification.
Entities:
Keywords:
Genetic associations; Genetic structure; Genetics of aging; Heterogeneous population; Longevity; Mortality selection; Principal component analysis
Authors: A I Yashin; G De Benedictis; J W Vaupel; Q Tan; K F Andreev; I A Iachine; M Bonafe; M DeLuca; S Valensin; L Carotenuto; C Franceschi Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 1999-10 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: A I Yashin; G De Benedictis; J W Vaupel; Q Tan; K F Andreev; I A Iachine; M Bonafe; S Valensin; M De Luca; L Carotenuto; C Franceschi Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2000-07 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Anne B Newman; Stefan Walter; Kathryn L Lunetta; Melissa E Garcia; P Eline Slagboom; Kaare Christensen; Alice M Arnold; Thor Aspelund; Yurii S Aulchenko; Emelia J Benjamin; Lene Christiansen; Ralph B D'Agostino; Annette L Fitzpatrick; Nora Franceschini; Nicole L Glazer; Vilmundur Gudnason; Albert Hofman; Robert Kaplan; David Karasik; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Douglas P Kiel; Lenore J Launer; Kristin D Marciante; Joseph M Massaro; Iva Miljkovic; Michael A Nalls; Dena Hernandez; Bruce M Psaty; Fernando Rivadeneira; Jerome Rotter; Sudha Seshadri; Albert V Smith; Kent D Taylor; Henning Tiemeier; Hae-Won Uh; André G Uitterlinden; James W Vaupel; Jeremy Walston; Rudi G J Westendorp; Tamara B Harris; Thomas Lumley; Cornelia M van Duijn; Joanne M Murabito Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2010-03-18 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Alkes L Price; Nick J Patterson; Robert M Plenge; Michael E Weinblatt; Nancy A Shadick; David Reich Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2006-07-23 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Stefan Walter; Gil Atzmon; Ellen W Demerath; Melissa E Garcia; Robert C Kaplan; Meena Kumari; Kathryn L Lunetta; Yuri Milaneschi; Toshiko Tanaka; Gregory J Tranah; Uwe Völker; Lei Yu; Alice Arnold; Emelia J Benjamin; Reiner Biffar; Aron S Buchman; Eric Boerwinkle; David Couper; Philip L De Jager; Denis A Evans; Tamara B Harris; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Albert Hofman; David Karasik; Douglas P Kiel; Thomas Kocher; Maris Kuningas; Lenore J Launer; Kurt K Lohman; Pamela L Lutsey; Johan Mackenbach; Kristin Marciante; Bruce M Psaty; Eric M Reiman; Jerome I Rotter; Sudha Seshadri; Michelle D Shardell; Albert V Smith; Cornelia van Duijn; Jeremy Walston; M Carola Zillikens; Stefania Bandinelli; Sebastian E Baumeister; David A Bennett; Luigi Ferrucci; Vilmundur Gudnason; Mika Kivimaki; Yongmei Liu; Joanne M Murabito; Anne B Newman; Henning Tiemeier; Nora Franceschini Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2011-07-22 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Alexander M Kulminski; Irina Culminskaya; Konstantin G Arbeev; Svetlana V Ukraintseva; Eric Stallard; Liubov Arbeeva; Anatoli I Yashin Journal: Aging Cell Date: 2013-02-18 Impact factor: 9.304
Authors: Konstantin G Arbeev; Igor Akushevich; Alexander M Kulminski; Liubov S Arbeeva; Lucy Akushevich; Svetlana V Ukraintseva; Irina V Culminskaya; Anatoli I Yashin Journal: J Theor Biol Date: 2009-02-04 Impact factor: 2.691
Authors: Kathryn L Lunetta; Ralph B D'Agostino; David Karasik; Emelia J Benjamin; Chao-Yu Guo; Raju Govindaraju; Douglas P Kiel; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Joseph M Massaro; Michael J Pencina; Sudha Seshadri; Joanne M Murabito Journal: BMC Med Genet Date: 2007-09-19 Impact factor: 2.103
Authors: Anatoliy I Yashin; Konstantin G Arbeev; Liubov S Arbeeva; Deqing Wu; Igor Akushevich; Mikhail Kovtun; Arseniy Yashkin; Alexander Kulminski; Irina Culminskaya; Eric Stallard; Miaozhu Li; Svetlana V Ukraintseva Journal: Biogerontology Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 4.277
Authors: Alexander M Kulminski; Yury Loika; Irina Culminskaya; Konstantin G Arbeev; Svetlana V Ukraintseva; Eric Stallard; Anatoliy I Yashin Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2016-10-14 Impact factor: 4.379
Authors: Anatoliy I Yashin; Deqing Wu; Liubov S Arbeeva; Konstantin G Arbeev; Alexander M Kulminski; Igor Akushevich; Mikhail Kovtun; Irina Culminskaya; Eric Stallard; Miaozhu Li; Svetlana V Ukraintseva Journal: Front Genet Date: 2015-04-13 Impact factor: 4.599