| Literature DB >> 25893195 |
Vera L Oliveira-Freitas1, Leonardo Dalla Giacomassa Rocha Thomaz2, Lucas Elias Lise Simoneti2, Christiane Malfitano3, Kátia De Angelis3, Jane Maria Ulbrich4, Gilberto Schwartsmann5, Cristiano Feijó Andrade6.
Abstract
RC-3095, a selective GRPR antagonist, has been shown to have anti-inflammatory properties in different models of inflammation. However, its protective effect on lungs submitted to lung ischemia-reperfusion injury has not been addressed before. Then, we administrated RC-3095 intravenously before and after lung reperfusion using an animal model of lung ischemia-reperfusion injury (LIRI) by clamping the pulmonary hilum. Twenty Wistar rats were subjected to an experimental model in four groups: SHAM, ischemia-reperfusion (IR), RC-Pre, and RC-Post. The final mean arterial pressure significantly decreased in IR and RC-Pre compared to their values before reperfusion (P < 0.001). The RC-Post group showed significant decrease of partial pressure of arterial oxygen at the end of the observation when compared to baseline (P = 0.005). Caspase-9 activity was significantly higher in the RC-Post as compared to the other groups (P < 0.013). No significant differences were observed in eNOS activity among the groups. The groups RC-Pre and RC-Post did not show any significant decrease in IL-1β (P = 0.159) and TNF-α (P = 0.260), as compared to IR. The histological score showed no significant differences among the groups. In conclusion, RC-3095 does not demonstrate a protective effect in our LIRI model. Additionally, its use after reperfusion seems to potentiate cell damage, stimulating apoptosis.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25893195 PMCID: PMC4393930 DOI: 10.1155/2015/496378
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Biomed Res Int Impact factor: 3.411
Hemodynamic variables and gas exchange. Comparative analysis of the groups regarding the time during all experimental protocol.
| MAP |
| PaO2 |
| PaCO2 |
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | t2 | Final | Baseline | t2 | Final | Baseline | t2 | Final | ||||
| SHAM | 94 | 90 | 86 | 0.165 | 342.2 | 278.6 | 300.6 | 0.368 | 47.4 | 44.9 | 47.5 | 0.779 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| IR | 110*
| 81 | 65**
| 0.007 | 187.1 | 228.1 | 149.1 | 0.449 | 35.9 | 39.9 | 20.7 | 0.819 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| RC-PRE | 93*
| 67.5 | 46**
| 0.015 | 282.3 | 223.7 | 116.5 | 0.074 | 41.2 | 36.7 | 46.4 | 0.091 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| RC-POST | 86.5 | 76 | 61.5 | 0.105 | 289.05 | 208.1 | 181.6 | 0.050 | 47.5 | 52.3 | 51.25 | 0.174 |
|
| ||||||||||||
| General | 94∗#
| 76**
| 65##
| <0.001 | 288.2*
| 228.1 | 195.3**
| 0.005 | 44.6 | 43.7 | 48.7 | 0.801 |
The values are described as median ± interquartile range. SHAM group did not have reperfusion and was observed for 120 minutes. t2: five minutes after reperfusion. Final: 120 minutes after reperfusion. The same symbols represent statistically significant difference. MAP = mean arterial pressure; PaO2 = partial pressure of arterial oxygen; PaCO2 = partial pressure of arterial carbon dioxide. ∗ P ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1IL-1β and TNF-α protein expression. There was no significant differences in lung tissue protein expression among the groups in IL-1β (P = 0.159) and TNF-α (P = 0.260). Data are presented as median ± standard error of the median.
Figure 2Photomicrograph of the lung in the different experimental groups. The histological score (HIS) showed no significant difference between groups (P = 0.973) (A: SHAM, B: IR, C: RC-Pre, and D: RC-Post, magnification ×100).
Figure 3Immunohistochemical staining for Cleaved Capase 9. There was maximum expression of brown-positive cells in pneumocytes specially in the RC- POST group (d). ((a): SHAM; (b): IR; (c):RC-PRE; and (d): RC-POST, magnification ×200).
Figure 4Cleaved caspase-9 pneumocyte expression in lung tissues. The RC-Post group exhibited a significant overexpression of cleaved caspase-9 (P < 0.013) compared to the other groups. Data are presented as the median ± standard error of the median.