| Literature DB >> 25892392 |
Abstract
For many years there has been a long-held clinical belief that a flat or over-pronating foot should be supported; yet in every other part of the body it has long been recognised that use of support (if at all) should generally be limited to acute rehabilitation. Why should the foot be any different? To support a biological structure, in the long term, is to weaken it. Panjabi's model of joint stability offers insight into why the idea of arch support, as well-intentioned as it may have been, may be a dysfunctional model. A test (and conditioning exercise) is presented which appears to support the notion that there is no such thing as a flat foot; only a de-conditioned foot.Entities:
Keywords: Conditioning; Flat foot; Orthotic; Over-pronation; Panjabi's model; Pronation; Strengthening; Structural flat foot
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25892392 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2015.02.007
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Bodyw Mov Ther ISSN: 1360-8592