Literature DB >> 25892145

Afatinib versus methotrexate as second-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck progressing on or after platinum-based therapy (LUX-Head & Neck 1): an open-label, randomised phase 3 trial.

Jean-Pascal H Machiels1, Robert I Haddad2, Jérôme Fayette3, Lisa F Licitra4, Makoto Tahara5, Jan B Vermorken6, Paul M Clement7, Thomas Gauler8, Didier Cupissol9, Juan José Grau10, Joël Guigay11, Francesco Caponigro12, Gilberto de Castro13, Luciano de Souza Viana14, Ulrich Keilholz15, Joseph M Del Campo16, Xiuyu Julie Cong17, Eva Ehrnrooth18, Ezra E W Cohen19.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC) progressing after first-line platinum regimens have a poor prognosis and few treatment options. Afatinib, an irreversible ERBB family blocker, has shown efficacy in a phase 2 study in this setting. We aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of afatinib compared with methotrexate as second-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC progressing on or after platinum-based therapy.
METHODS: In this open-label, phase 3, randomised controlled trial conducted in 101 centres in 19 countries, we enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with histologically or cytologically confirmed HNSCC that was recurrent, metastatic, or both who had progressed on or after first-line platinum-based therapy, were not amenable for salvage surgery or radiotherapy, and who had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1. Previous treatment with more than one systemic regimen in this setting was not allowed; previous treatment with EGFR-targeted antibody therapy (but not EGFR-targeted tyrosine-kinase inhibitors) was allowed. We randomly assigned eligible patients in a 2:1 ratio to receive oral afatinib (40 mg/day) or intravenous methotrexate (40 mg/m(2) per week), stratified by ECOG performance status and previous EGFR-targeted antibody therapy for recurrent or metastatic disease. Randomisation was done centrally with an interactive voice or web-based response system. Clinicians and patients were not masked to treatment allocation; independent review of tumour response was done in a blinded manner. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival as assessed by an independent, central imaging review committee. Efficacy analyses were done in the intention-to-treat population and safety analyses were done in patients who received at least one dose of study drug. This ongoing study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01345682.
FINDINGS: Between Jan 10, 2012, and Dec 12, 2013, we enrolled 483 patients and randomly assigned 322 to afatinib and 161 to methotrexate. After a median follow-up of 6·7 months (IQR 3·1-9·0), progression-free survival was longer in the afatinib group than in the methotrexate group (median 2·6 months [95% CI 2·0-2·7] for the afatinib group vs 1·7 months [1·5-2·4] for the methotrexate group; hazard ratio [HR] 0·80 [95% CI 0·65-0·98], p=0·030). The most frequent grade 3 or 4 drug-related adverse events were rash or acne (31 [10%] of 320 patients in the afatinib group vs none of 160 patients in the methotrexate group), diarrhoea (30 [9%] vs three [2%]), stomatitis (20 [6%] vs 13 [8%]), fatigue (18 [6%] vs five [3%]), and neutropenia (1 [<1%] vs 11 [7%]); serious adverse events occurred in 44 (14%) of afatinib-treated patients and 18 (11%) of methotrexate-treated patients.
INTERPRETATION: Afatinib was associated with significant improvements in progression-free survival and had a manageable safety profile. These findings provide important new insights into the treatment of this patient population and support further investigations with irreversible ERBB family blockers in HNSCC. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25892145     DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)70124-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet Oncol        ISSN: 1470-2045            Impact factor:   41.316


  117 in total

1.  [Treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma recurrences and distant metastases: Highlights of the ASCO Meeting 2015].

Authors:  L Bußmann; C-J Busch; R Knecht
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-09       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Mutation of chromatin regulators and focal hotspot alterations characterize human papillomavirus-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Sunny Haft; Shuling Ren; Guorong Xu; Adam Mark; Kathleen Fisch; Theresa W Guo; Zubair Khan; John Pang; Mizuo Ando; Chao Liu; Akihiro Sakai; Takahito Fukusumi; Joseph A Califano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2019-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Synergistic Growth Inhibition by Afatinib and Trametinib in Preclinical Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma Models.

Authors:  Pei San Yee; Nur Syafinaz Zainal; Chai Phei Gan; Bernard K B Lee; Kein Seong Mun; Mannil Thomas Abraham; Siti Mazlipah Ismail; Zainal Ariff Abdul Rahman; Vyomesh Patel; Sok Ching Cheong
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 4.  Molecular mechanisms of human papillomavirus-related carcinogenesis in head and neck cancer.

Authors:  Farhoud Faraji; Munfarid Zaidi; Carole Fakhry; Daria A Gaykalova
Journal:  Microbes Infect       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 2.700

5.  Evaluation of FGFR3 as a Therapeutic Target in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Anne von Mässenhausen; Mario Deng; Hannah Billig; Angela Queisser; Wenzel Vogel; Glen Kristiansen; Andreas Schröck; Friedrich Bootz; Friederike Göke; Alina Franzen; Lynn Heasley; Jutta Kirfel; Johannes Brägelmann; Sven Perner
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 4.493

6.  Head and neck cancer: second-line afatinib shows promise.

Authors:  David Killock
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 66.675

7.  PTEN loss is associated with resistance to cetuximab in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Nnamdi Eze; Ju-Whei Lee; Dong-Hua Yang; Fang Zhu; Veronique Neumeister; Teresa Sandoval-Schaefer; Ranee Mehra; John A Ridge; Arlene Forastiere; Christine H Chung; Barbara Burtness
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2019-03-04       Impact factor: 5.337

Review 8.  EGFR-targeted therapies in the post-genomic era.

Authors:  Mary Jue Xu; Daniel E Johnson; Jennifer R Grandis
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 9.  Metastatic disease in head & neck oncology.

Authors:  Paolo Pisani; Mario Airoldi; Anastasia Allais; Paolo Aluffi Valletti; Mariapina Battista; Marco Benazzo; Roberto Briatore; Salvatore Cacciola; Salvatore Cocuzza; Andrea Colombo; Bice Conti; Alberto Costanzo; Laura Della Vecchia; Nerina Denaro; Cesare Fantozzi; Danilo Galizia; Massimiliano Garzaro; Ida Genta; Gabriela Alejandra Iasi; Marco Krengli; Vincenzo Landolfo; Giovanni Vittorio Lanza; Mauro Magnano; Maurizio Mancuso; Roberto Maroldi; Laura Masini; Marco Carlo Merlano; Marco Piemonte; Silvia Pisani; Adriele Prina-Mello; Luca Prioglio; Maria Gabriella Rugiu; Felice Scasso; Agostino Serra; Guido Valente; Micol Zannetti; Angelo Zigliani
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 10.  Targeting cellular and molecular drivers of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: current options and emerging perspectives.

Authors:  Simonetta Ausoni; Paolo Boscolo-Rizzo; Bhuvanesh Singh; Maria Cristina Da Mosto; Giacomo Spinato; Giancarlo Tirelli; Roberto Spinato; Giuseppe Azzarello
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 9.264

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.