Literature DB >> 25891686

Data management challenges in analysis and synthesis in the ecosystem sciences.

A Specht1, S Guru2, L Houghton1, L Keniger3, P Driver4, E G Ritchie5, K Lai1, A Treloar6.   

Abstract

Open-data has created an unprecedented opportunity with new challenges for ecosystem scientists. Skills in data management are essential to acquire, manage, publish, access and re-use data. These skills span many disciplines and require trans-disciplinary collaboration. Science synthesis centres support analysis and synthesis through collaborative 'Working Groups' where domain specialists work together to synthesise existing information to provide insight into critical problems. The Australian Centre for Ecological Analysis and Synthesis (ACEAS) served a wide range of stakeholders, from scientists to policy-makers to managers. This paper investigates the level of sophistication in data management in the ecosystem science community through the lens of the ACEAS experience, and identifies the important factors required to enable us to benefit from this new data-world and produce innovative science. ACEAS promoted the analysis and synthesis of data to solve transdisciplinary questions, and promoted the publication of the synthesised data. To do so, it provided support in many of the key skillsets required. Analysis and synthesis in multi-disciplinary and multi-organisational teams, and publishing data were new for most. Data were difficult to discover and access, and to make ready for analysis, largely due to lack of metadata. Data use and publication were hampered by concerns about data ownership and a desire for data citation. A web portal was created to visualise geospatial datasets to maximise data interpretation. By the end of the experience there was a significant increase in appreciation of the importance of a Data Management Plan. It is extremely doubtful that the work would have occurred or data delivered without the support of the Synthesis centre, as few of the participants had the necessary networks or skills. It is argued that participation in the Centre provided an important learning opportunity, and has resulted in improved knowledge and understanding of good data management practices. Crown
Copyright © 2015. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Data Management Plan; Data visualisation; Data workflow; Metadata; Synthesis Centre; Transdisciplinary

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25891686     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.03.092

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  5 in total

1.  Ecological Equivalence Assessment Methods: What Trade-Offs between Operationality, Scientific Basis and Comprehensiveness?

Authors:  Lucie Bezombes; Stéphanie Gaucherand; Christian Kerbiriou; Marie-Eve Reinert; Thomas Spiegelberger
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Attitudes and norms affecting scientists' data reuse.

Authors:  Renata Gonçalves Curty; Kevin Crowston; Alison Specht; Bruce W Grant; Elizabeth D Dalton
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Data Management Rubric for Video Data in Organismal Biology.

Authors:  Elizabeth L Brainerd; Richard W Blob; Tyson L Hedrick; Andrew T Creamer; Ulrike K Müller
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 3.326

4.  A story of data won, data lost and data re-found: the realities of ecological data preservation.

Authors:  Alison Specht; Matthew P Bolton; Bryn Kingsford; Raymond L Specht; Lee Belbin
Journal:  Biodivers Data J       Date:  2018-11-07

5.  Open Data in Global Environmental Research: The Belmont Forum's Open Data Survey.

Authors:  Birgit Schmidt; Birgit Gemeinholzer; Andrew Treloar
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.240

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.